Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00878215
Other study ID # 201104308
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase Phase 2
First received April 7, 2009
Last updated January 16, 2018
Start date October 24, 2002
Est. completion date May 25, 2011

Study information

Verified date January 2018
Source Washington University School of Medicine
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Image-guided surgery is a new technology, which is used to create 3-D pictures that generate a map of the liver. This map will allow surgeons to know the exact anatomical location of their instruments, including instances when direct visualization is not possible. This study is designed to determine the safety and feasibility of using image-guided techniques for treatment of liver tumors. The overall goal of this study is to use image-guided surgery for the improvement of the surgeon's ability to remove liver tumors.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date May 25, 2011
Est. primary completion date May 25, 2011
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Written informed consent must be obtained.

- Patient must be 18 years or older.

- Are male or non-pregnant, non-lactating females. Liver resection or ablation could be harmful to an unborn child therefore, is not recommended during pregnancy. After informed consent is obtained, women of childbearing potential will be required to have a blood or urine pregnancy test. All consented patients of childbearing potential will be advised to use adequate birth control (oral, implanted, or barrier methods) along with their sexual partners while being considered for liver tumor resection or ablation and at least up to a month following surgery.

- Patients enrolled in Phase I must be candidates for surgical liver resection per a treating surgeon's discretion. Patients enrolled in Phase 2-3 must be candidates for surgical liver resection of liver mass. Patients enrolled in Phase 4 must be candidates for surgical ablation, but not candidates for surgical resection.

- Patients are scheduled clinically for use of the Pathfinder Explorer Liver Image Guided System which is indicated for open liver surgical procedures where image-guidance may be appropriate and where the patient can tolerate long apneic periods under general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Any condition which, in the judgment of the investigator, might increase the risk to the subject or decrease the chance of obtaining satisfactory data to achieve the objectives of the study.

- Mental condition rendering the subject or his/her legal representative unable to understand informed consent to the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Explorer Liver Image Guided System

Explorer Liver Passive Tracking

Procedure:
Liver surgery
-Standard of care
Liver abalation
-Standard of care

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Washington University School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Washington University School of Medicine

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (12)

Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD. Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1987 May;9(5):698-700. — View Citation

Besl PM,McKay ND.A method for registraion of 3-D shapes.IEEE Transaactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 14:239-256,1992

Cash DM,Siha Tk,Chapman,WC.Fast, accurate surface acquistion using a laser range scanner for image-guided surgical system.SPIE Medical Imaging,2002

Dick EA, Taylor-Robinson SD, Thomas HC, Gedroyc WM. Ablative therapy for liver tumours. Gut. 2002 May;50(5):733-9. Review. — View Citation

Herline AJ, Herring JL, Stefansic JD, Chapman WC, Galloway RL Jr, Dawant BM. Surface registration for use in interactive, image-guided liver surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 2000;5(1):11-7. — View Citation

Herline AJ, Stefansic JD, Debelak JP, Hartmann SL, Pinson CW, Galloway RL, Chapman WC. Image-guided surgery: preliminary feasibility studies of frameless stereotactic liver surgery. Arch Surg. 1999 Jun;134(6):644-9; discussion 649-50. — View Citation

Horn BKP.closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions 4:629-642,1987

Pan S,Dawant BM.Automatic 3-D segmentation of the liver from abdominal CT images: a level-set approach. Proceedings of SPIE 4322:128-138,2001.

Parikh AA, Curley SA, Fornage BD, Ellis LM. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases. Semin Oncol. 2002 Apr;29(2):168-82. Review. — View Citation

Rosen CB. Management of Hepatic Metastases. Cancer Control. 1998 May;5(3 Suppl 1):30-31. — View Citation

Sardi A, Akbarov A, Conaway G. Management of primary and metastatic tumors to the liver. Oncology (Williston Park). 1996 Jun;10(6):911-25; discussion 926, 929-30. Review. — View Citation

Stefansic JD, Bass WA, Hartmann SL, Beasley RA, Sinha TK, Cash DM, Herline AJ, Galloway RL Jr. Design and implementation of a PC-based image-guided surgical system. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2002 Nov;69(3):211-24. — View Citation

* Note: There are 12 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of Participants Who Have a Successful Intraoperative Registrations (Phase 1 Portion of Study) 10 successful intraoperative registrations with no more than 30% failure rate over all the cases will be considered a successful endpoint
A successful registration is defined as one which yields an RMS surface residual of = 10 mm and is determined to be success after qualitative evaluation.
Completion of surgery
Primary Accuracy With Which Image-guided Surgery (IGS) Can be Used to Implant a Ceramic Bead Inside a Tumor as Measured by Successful Deliveries of the Bead to Within 8mm of the Pre-operatively Planned Target Point (Phase 2 Portion of Study) Calculation of bead delivery accuracy using the IGS system involves the acquisition of images of the resected specimen and then the co-registration of the post-resection images to the pre-operative image set. Given that the target location is marked in the pre-operative image set and the registration calculation allows an overlay of the two image sets a Euclidean distance error can be calculated between the true bead location and the pre-operatively determined target. Given that the error involved in computing the registration between the two image sets is included within the bead delivery target error calculation it is imperative that the impact of registration error is minimized.
Numbers represented are the distance between the planned target site and the true bead location
Completion of surgery
Primary Target Accuracy of an Ablation Probe Using Image-guided Surgery Technology as Measured by the Number of Participants Who Had Ablation Burns Within a 5mm Radius of the Tumor Centroid (Phase 3 Portion of Study) -A measurement of the ablation probe placement via the burn zone will be performed by pathology via specimen sectioning. Completion of surgery
Primary The Number of Participants Who Have Complete Ablation According to Early Post-ablative Imaging Studies as Well as no Recurrence of the Tumor Within 6 Months (Phase 4 Portion of the Study) -A successful endpoint will be a 90% success rate of complete ablation according to early post-ablative imaging studies as well as no recurrence of the tumor within 6 months. 6 months post-ablation
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03971201 - A Randomized Phase II Trial of Surgery Plus Sorafenib vs. Sorafenib Alone for Hepatocellular Cancer (HCC) With Portal Vein Invasion Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05489250 - The PLATON Network
Recruiting NCT04484636 - PLATON - Platform for Analyzing Targetable Tumor Mutations (Pilot-study) N/A
Completed NCT01967823 - T Cell Receptor Immunotherapy Targeting NY-ESO-1 for Patients With NY-ESO-1 Expressing Cancer Phase 2
Completed NCT04212286 - Comparing the Diagnostic Efficiencies of CEUS and EOB-MRI in Patients With High Risk of HCC N/A
Recruiting NCT05992220 - Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Alone or Combined With External Beam Radiotherapy for HCC With Macrovascular Invasion Phase 2
Completed NCT02073435 - A2ALL-Patients Safety System Improvements in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
Active, not recruiting NCT01522937 - A Study of Individualized Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Intrahepatic Cancer Phase 2
Terminated NCT05061537 - Study of PF-07263689 in Participants With Selected Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT04166240 - Measuring and Improving the Safety of Test Result Follow-Up N/A
Withdrawn NCT02288507 - Sorafenib Concurrent With Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Cancer Phase 1
Terminated NCT03026803 - A Study of Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine in Unresectable Metastatic Hepatocellular Cancer Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04682847 - Radiotherapy With Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (SPION) on MR-Linac for Primary & Metastatic Hepatic Cancers
Recruiting NCT05100082 - Survey of Cabozantinib Tablets Used To Treat People With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Active, not recruiting NCT03195699 - Oral STAT3 Inhibitor, TTI-101, in Patients With Advanced Cancers Phase 1
Completed NCT02616692 - HCC Patient Preferences in Japan N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03132792 - AFPᶜ³³²T in Advanced HCC Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT06239194 - Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of MDX2001 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT01849588 - Sorafenib for Hepatocellular Cancer With Chronic Hepatitis C Phase 4
Completed NCT00997022 - Trial of Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Cancer (HCC) Transplant Patients Phase 1