View clinical trials related to Hepatitis B.
Filter by:This is a research study to determine if the study drug lenalidomide will increase the body's immune response, which is the body's response against infections or tumors, to hepatitis B vaccine in patients with plasma cell diseases which include multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS) and Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia. It is not a study to see if lenalidomide is an effective treatment for plasma cell disease. Participants in this study have multiple myeloma or other plasma cell disease and have never been vaccinated with hepatitis B vaccine. One of the effects of the drug lenalidomide is to alter the immune system and thereby increase immune response. It also has some effect against cancer cells; therefore, in theory, it may reduce or prevent the growth of cancer cells. In this study, one-half of the subjects will be chosen at random to receive the study drug and the other half will take a placebo pill (a sugar pill that looks the same as the real medication). This is a double blind study where neither the subjects nor the investigators know whether the patient receives the study drugs or placebo pills. The effects of the active drug lenalidomide will be compared to the effects of the placebo. The results from this study will be also be compared with a similar but separate study to be done on individuals without known disease. This study expects to enroll 64 subjects and will be carried out at the Boston VA Healthcare System and the Dana Farber Cancer Institute.
- The cohort will integrate clinical, genetic, pharmacogenomics, environmental, biomarkers and behavioral data in a large number of patients and will be a leading equipment for crossdisciplinary and translational research on hepatitis. - The cohort will be the main support for estimating the relative effects of treatments and for further cost-effectiveness studies on the management and treatment options in chronic HCV (Hepatitis C Virus)and HBV (Hepatitis B virus)infections.
To prove that a study drug is noninferior to a control drug with a proportion of subjects who showed HBV DNA undetected (less than 400 copies/mL (69 IU/mL)) at the 48th week after 48-week administration of Besifovir 150 mg, or Tenofovir 300 mg as a control drug to chronic hepatitis B patients
This is an open label clinical study designed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of Sci-B-Vac Hepatitis B Vaccine compared to Engerix-B Hepatitis B Vaccine in dialysis patients. The study hypothesis is that vaccination with Sci B Vac will achieve a higher seroprotection rate and a higher anti-Hepatitis B surface antibody serum titer level than vaccination with Engerix-B Dialysis patients will be categorized as "naïve" or "previously vaccinated" and each group will be randomized to treatment. Naïve patients randomized to Sci-B-Vac Hepatitis B vaccine will receive vaccination in three doses, 10 μg each, at 0, 1, and 6 months, or Engerix-B Hepatitis B vaccine given in four doses, 40 μg each, at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months. Previously vaccinated patients randomized to Sci-B-Vac Hepatitis B vaccine will receive vaccination in three doses, 20 μg each, at 0, 1, and 6 months, or Engerix-B Hepatitis B vaccine given in four doses, 40 μg each, at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months. All vaccines will be administered via intra-muscular injection to the deltoid muscle. The study will consist of three periods: a screening period of up to four weeks, a 24-week open-label treatment period, and a 24-week safety follow-up period. The total expected duration of the study per subject is 52 weeks as follows: Screening period: approximately 4 weeks; treatment period: 24 weeks; and follow up period: 24 weeks. The primary endpoint is the by-vaccine difference in the proportion of subjects attaining seroprotective immune response (anti-Hepatitis B surface antibody ≥ 10 IU/mL) 4 weeks after the last vaccination with either Sci-B-Vac or Engerix-B. Secondary endpoints include anti-Hepatitis B surface antibody geometric mean concentrations calculated for all subjects upon last active dose; the proportion of subjects with anti-Hepatitis B surface antibody concentrations equal to or above 10 IU/mL for all subjects at 12 weeks following the first vaccine dose; the by-treatment difference in serum titer levels of anti-Hepatitis B surface antibodies at 12, 24 and 52 weeks following the first vaccination. A by-vaccine comparison of adverse events will also be performed.
Antiviral prophylaxis can prevent the risk of biologic agents-associated HBV reactivation in hepatitis B inactive carriers and patients with past HBV infection
The purpose of this study is to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of entecavir 1.0 mg/d + adefovir 10 mg/d with entecavir 0.5 mg/d + adefovir 10 mg/d for chronic hepatitis B patients with inadequate response to NUC therapy
Background: - There are two forms of chronic hepatitis B. The difference between the forms is whether or not a viral protein called hepatitis B e antigen is present in the blood. Standard approaches to treating both forms of chronic hepatitis B involve different drugs. One drug is called peginterferon, another is called tenofovir DF. These drugs are often given separately and used for different forms of the disease. However, researchers want to see if combining peginterferon and tenofovir DF will be a more effective treatment than tenofovir DF alone. Objectives: - To see whether combining tenofovir DF and peginterferon, or using tenofovir DF alone, is a more effective treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Eligibility: - Individuals at least 18 years of age who have chronic hepatitis B and are in the Hepatitis B Research Network Cohort study. Design: - Participants will be screened with a physical exam and medical history. Blood, urine, and liver tissue samples will be collected. Bone and liver imaging studies will also be performed. - Participants will be divided into two groups. One group will have tenofovir DF alone for 192 weeks (about 4 years). The other group will have tenofovir DF and peginterferon for 24 weeks (about 6 months), and then tenofovir DF alone for 168 weeks (about 3.5 years). - Participants will take the study drugs on the schedule determined by their study doctors. They will keep a diary to record their doses and any side effects. - Participants will have three study visits 4 weeks apart after the starting the treatment. At these visits, they will have a physical exam and provide blood samples. They may also provide urine samples and have imaging studies. - After the first three study visits, participants will continue to have study visits every 12 weeks until the treatment ends at week 192. These visits will have many of the same tests as the first three visits. At some of these visits, they may fill out questionnaires about their quality of life. - Participants who do not respond to the study drugs may have their medications changed. They may also be asked to stop treatment.
Background: The HBsAg clearance rate in interferon-treated responders is significantly higher than that in lamivudine-treated responders, implying immune control is the key to HBsAg clearance. There is a good chance to further increase the cure rate if the investigators can enhance the HBV-specific immune response when the HBsAg level already comes to a low level. Hypothesis: HBsAg-based vaccine can enhance HBsAg clearance in chronic hepatitis B patients whose HBsAg already <=2000 IU/ml. Patients and methods: This pilot study will enroll 20 chronic hepatitis B patients with HBsAg ≦2000 IU/ml, no hepatic decompensation, no HIV coinfection, nor clinical immunodeficiency. Engerix-B vaccine (20μg for <20 years old and 40 μg for ≥ 20 years old) will be given every 2 months for one year. HBsAg quantification, anti-HBs, and HBV DNA will be surveyed regularly before each dose during the treatment period and every 3 months for another year following the last dose. Viral and cellular factors will be studied to discover determinants affecting HBsAg clearance. Aims 1. To elucidate whether HBsAg-based vaccine can reactivate host immunity to eliminate chronic HBV infection in patients with low titer HBsAg. 2. To delineate the doses to response (HBsAg clearance or decline rate) correlation so as to design a feasible schedule for future clinical trials in a larger group of patients. 3. To discover viral and host factors which can be used as biomarkers for personalized vaccine therapy.
This is an ancillary to the NIDDK-sponsored treatment trials titled: Combination Therapy of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Tenofovir Versus Tenofovir Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B (NCT01369212) and Combination Entecavir and Peginterferon Therapy in HBeAg-Positive Immune-Tolerant Adults With Chronic Hepatitis B (NCT01369199). This study will examine the balance between immune regulatory and effector responses in hepatitis B-infected participants enrolled in the HBRN's clinical trials (NCT01369212 and NCT01369199) to define natural history and treatment outcome.
This is a pilot, monocentric, prospective, randomized control trial looking at the use of rapid tests as a part of normal care. The investigators will be testing for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Testing will be proposed to all persons seeking care at the Centre d'Accueil, de Soins et d'Orientation from the organization Médecin du Monde (CASO, MDM). Infection status of participants will be determined by either the standard test (ELISA) or rapid test. The choice between tests will be determined randomly. The overall goal is to determine the general acceptability and feasibility of rapid tests and to see if they can help individuals increase their awareness of infection status when compared to longer, routine methods of testing. In addition, results from these tests will allow the medical doctor to guide participants to appropriate care. All positive tests will be confirmed at a specialized hospital (Hôptial Saint-Antoine, Paris, France) and health-specific information will be obtained four months after testing.