Clinical Trials Logo

Hepatitis B clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Hepatitis B.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02496897 Completed - Hepatitis B Clinical Trials

Phase I Safety and Immunogenicity of FP-02.2 in Chronic Hepatitis B

Start date: July 2015
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This study evaluates the safety and immunogenicity of FP-02.2, a new therapeutic Hepatitis B vaccine, administered as an add-on therapy to entecavir or tenofovir.

NCT ID: NCT02445703 Completed - Hepatitis B Clinical Trials

Comparison of Immunization Schedules of Inactivated Hepatitis A Vaccine and Combined Hepatitis A and Hepatitis B Vaccine

Start date: May 2014
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the immunogenicity and safety of three different immunization schedules of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (HAV) and/ or combined hepatitis A and B vaccine (HABV) in healthy Chinese infants.

NCT ID: NCT02444611 Completed - Clinical trials for Innate Immune Response

A Trial Investigating the Influence of BCG and Hepatitis B Immunisation at Birth on Neonatal Immune Responses: The Early Life Vaccines and Immunity Study

ELVIS
Start date: March 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Neonatal morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases is of global concern. Childhood disease-specific immunisation is irrefutably linked to the decline in deaths from these targeted infections over the last century. However, neonatal immunisation is limited, in part, by the impaired adaptive immune function in this age group. There is now an expanding body of evidence for heterologous ('non-specific') effects of various vaccines used in childhood. This refers to the immunomodulatory capabilities of vaccines to influence immune outcomes beyond the vaccine's specific targeted disease. The underlying immunological mechanisms responsible for these effects are incompletely understood, but evidence is mounting that the innate immune system is central to these observed effects. This study is a randomised controlled trial designed to determine the influence of two commonly administered neonatal immunisations, BCG and Hepatitis B vaccine, given at birth, on the neonatal immune responses to non-specific antigens. The investigators will recruit 200 newborns at the Mercy Hospital for Women in Melbourne, Australia over a 1-year period. These babies will be allocated randomly to one of 4 groups, receiving these 2 vaccines in different combinations, at 2 set time points. (at birth and 1 week post randomisation) A blood sample will be taken at 1-week post randomisation for in vitro immunological analyses. This study will improve current understanding of the influence of vaccines on neonatal immunity and will help develop strategies exploiting beneficial heterologous ('non-specific') effects to improve protection against infection in the very young.

NCT ID: NCT02443233 Completed - Clinical trials for Hepatitis B Infection

Evaluation of Paternal, Maternal and Obstetric Factors Leading to the Hepatitis B Immunization Failure in Hong Kong

Start date: January 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Globally, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the most common form of chronic hepatitis. There are still a lot of uncertainties on how infants acquired HBV leading to the development of chronic HBV infection despite active and passive immunoprophylaxis. The investigators would like to carry out a prospective study to answer the following questions: 1. the paternal, maternal and obstetric factors leading to immunoprophylaxis failure 2. the prevalence of immunoprophylaxis failure in Hong Kong

NCT ID: NCT02434848 Completed - HIV Clinical Trials

A Pilot Study Comparing the Immunogenicity of Fendrix vs. Double-dose Engerix B in HIV-infected Non-responders to Standard Hepatitis B Vaccination Courses

Start date: July 23, 2015
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection can result in a greater risk of adverse outcomes in HIV-infected individuals, including more rapid progression to cirrhosis and associated complications such as hepatocellular carcinoma. For this reason, as well as the shared routes of transmission between the two viruses, UK and International guidance recommends that all HBV-negative HIV-infected individuals be offered vaccination against HBV. Unfortunately, response rates in this population can be as low as 17.5 - 40% to standard vaccination courses. To improve this response, strategies such as the use of double dose of standard vaccines (e.g. Engerix B) is recommended in several guidelines for previous non-responders, although there is currently limited evidence for this approach. An alternative strategy is to use vaccines with novel adjuvants such as Fendrix and observational clinical data in the Investigators HIV cohort suggests that response rates can be as high as 81% of individuals achieving HBV surface antibody (HBsAb) levels >100 in a group that did not respond to previous standard HBV vaccine courses. However, the cost of Fendrix is considerably higher than Engerix B and controlled trials are required to confirm whether this approach is warranted. Furthermore, insights into the potential mechanisms by which Fendrix may elicit better responses would be valuable in optimising future vaccine strategies in this population. The Investigators propose to conduct a randomised, open label, active-controlled pilot study comparing double dose Engerix B and Fendrix in HIV-infected non-responders to standard HBV vaccine courses, which will provide the necessary data to design and power a larger multicentre randomised controlled trial. Outcome measures will include the proportion of individuals seroconverting with HBsAb levels >100 following each vaccination course, the magnitude and quality of the HBV-specific CD4+ T-cell responses elicited by each vaccine and the durability of the HBsAb response at 1 year following the end of vaccination.

NCT ID: NCT02432430 Completed - Immunization Clinical Trials

Comparison of Immunization Quality Improvement Dissemination Study

CIzQIDS
Start date: June 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Dissemination research examines the processes and factors that lead to widespread use of evidence-based interventions. There are several theories on how to best minimize the perceived and actual burdens on practitioners associated with implementing evidence-based medicine. For instance, the pay for performance model attempts to improve physician compliance with quality guidelines by providing financial incentives. Recent studies suggest pay for performance is effective in improving practitioner performance, but it is unclear whether the gains are sustainable once incentives are stopped. Another approach to promoting best practices is the Model for Improvement whose main method is to employ Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles of small changes Although this approach has been successful within individual institutions, there is minimal evidence of its effect when employed simultaneously in multiple autonomous institutions. There is also little evidence of the sustainability of outcomes after intervention activities end. The specific aims of the proposed study are to examine the effect of quality improvement dissemination models on the immunization coverage of children ages 3 to 18 months old. The investigators propose to: 1. Determine the effect on immunization compliance of two different models of dissemination which will provide physicians 12 months of quality improvement (QI) activity support for implementing CDC immunization best practices. Hypothesis 1a: Study participants receiving the QI technical support intervention (QITS) will have more improvement in immunization rates from baseline to immediately after support ends than participants receiving the pay for performance intervention (P4P). Hypothesis 1b: Study participants receiving QITS will increase immunization coverage for their practices over baseline. Hypothesis 1c: Study participants receiving P4P will increase immunization coverage for their practices over baseline.

NCT ID: NCT02431312 Completed - Hepatitis B Clinical Trials

Phase I Study of INO-1800 With or Without INO-9112 + EP in Chronic Hepatitis B Subjects

Start date: January 12, 2015
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

This was an open-label study that evaluated the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of dose combinations of INO-1800 (DNA plasmids encoding Hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] and Hepatitis B core antigen [HBcAg]) and INO-9112 (DNA plasmid encoding human interleukin 12) delivered by electroporation (EP) in 90 (ninety) nucleos(t)ide analogue treated participants.

NCT ID: NCT02428491 Completed - Hepatitis B Clinical Trials

Immunogenicity and Safety of Sanofi Pasteur's Combined Vaccine Given as a Three-Dose Primary Series at 2, 3,4 Months of Age and Followed by a Booster Dose Given at 16 to 17 Months of Age in Vietnamese Infants Who Previously Received a Dose of Hepatitis B Vaccine at Birth or Within 1 Week After Birth

Start date: April 20, 2015
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to describe the immunogenicity and safety of Sanofi Pasteur's DTaP-IPV-Hep B-PRP-T fully liquid combined hexavalent vaccine (Hexaxim®) administered at 2, 3, and 4 months of age and at 16 to 17 months of age in infants and toddlers who received a dose of Hep B vaccine at birth or within 1 week after birth. Primary Objective: - To describe the safety profile after each and all doses of Sanofi-Pasteur's DTaP-IPV-Hep B-PRP-T combined vaccine in Vietnamese infants and toddlers. Secondary Objective: - To demonstrate the non-inferiority of the immune response to all antigens induced by the study vaccine in Vietnamese infants one month after the third dose in a 3-dose primary series with the immune response to all antigens induced by the same study vaccine outside Vietnam. - To evaluate the immunogenicity of the study vaccine one month after the 3-dose primary series. - To describe the persistence of all antibodies before receipt of the booster vaccination. - To evaluate the immunogenicity of the study vaccine one month after the booster.

NCT ID: NCT02428400 Completed - Chronic Hepatitis B Clinical Trials

Safety and Tolerability of TG1050: A Dose-finding Study

Start date: October 2015
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

Methodology: This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-cohort Phase 1/1b study in patients that are currently being treated for chronic HBV infection. For all cohorts, patients must be receiving antiviral treatment with either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or entecavir (ENT) for at least two years, and have their HBV infection well-controlled

NCT ID: NCT02422264 Completed - Tetanus Clinical Trials

Immunogenicity and Safety Study of Infanrix Hexa in Healthy Infants Born to Mothers Vaccinated With Boostrix™ During Pregnancy or Immediately Post-delivery

Start date: January 22, 2016
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of GSK Biologicals' Infanrix hexa, given in the primary vaccination schedule to infants born to pregnant women who participated in study 116945 [DTPA (BOOSTRIX)-047]. This study will help us evaluate if the presence of transplacentally transferred maternal antibodies interfere with the immune response to primary vaccination with Infanrix hexa and a co-administered pneumococcal conjugate vaccine given as a part of this study in infants.