View clinical trials related to Hepatitis B, Chronic.
Filter by:This research puts liver biopsy as the enrollment screening criteria and the primary efficacy assessment indicators. Patients at different developmental stages of hepatitis B related liver fibrosis are respectively diagnosed and treated by Traditional Chinese medicine to determine optional diagnosis and treatment plan of traditional Chinese medicine to screen the advantage-treated population and to establish a treatment program, which can save national medical resources, for clinical application of Traditional Chinese medicine Diagnosis and Treatment blocking and reversing hepatitis B-related liver fibrosis. The research can help to build automation pathological analysis and diagnosis systems and non-invasive clinical assessment criteria and models of liver fibrosis which can be applied in clinical. It can also help to realize electronic patient data collection and management, to establish patients management centre and follow-up database. Then it will help to improve clinical efficacy of being blocked and reversed chronic hepatitis B related liver fibrosis by Chinese medicine Diagnosis and Treatment program, to reduce the incidence of liver cirrhosis and hepatitis B-related mortality, to prolong patients' survival and improve patients' quality of life, to make clinical efficacy, which is about Traditional Chinese Medicine blocking and revering chronic hepatitis B-related liver fibrosis, increase by 15% or more .
This study is designed to support the optimal use of telbivudine by providing data to refine our understanding of telbivudine efficacy and resistance in real life clinical setting in patients with chronic hepatitis B with defined baseline characteristics and 24-week PCR negativity.
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global health problem, especially in the endemic area like Taiwan, where there are more than 3 million chronic hepatitis B carriers. Patients with chronic HBV infection are at increased risk of developing cirrhosis, which may have disastrous complications, including hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The liver cirrhosis related complications accounts for the 8th leading cause of deaths in Taiwan; whereas, the HCC is the 2nd leading cause of deaths among all cancers. Therefore, it is prudent to develop strategies to prevent or halt the progression of liver cirrhosis. For HBV patients who have already had cirrhosis, the main treatment objective is to reduce their risk of complications. A large-scale multicenter clinical trial showed that viral suppression using lamivudine in patients with advanced fibrosis effectively decreases the risk of HCC and liver-related complications. This study highlights the importance to treat HBV-related cirrhosis patients; however, several issues remain to be addressed. The first issue is that this clinical trial only enrolled patients with positive HBeAg or HBV-DNA level >1.4 x105 IU/mL. However, the current recommended threshold for cirrhotic patients to start anti-viral treatment is 2000 IU/mL. Whether anti-HBV therapy benefits cirrhotic patients in this level is still unclear. Second, lamivudine was used in this clinical trial; however, the high resistant rate of lamivudine during treatment probably lowers its protective effect against HCC. Whether a more potent anti-HBV agent with extremely low resistance profile, entecavir, is more beneficial to HBV-related cirrhotic patients is also unclear. The Bureau of National Health Institute launched the reimbursement program for anti-HBV therapy since 2003 and extended this program to cirrhotic patients with HBV DNA level > 2000 IU/mL for long-term use since Aug, 2010. Taking this advantage, we may explore the above-mentioned clinical questions more easily. To address these issues, we will first retrospectively collect a cohort of HBV-related cirrhosis patients. All the patients will be enrolled from the time before oral anti-HBV therapy is widely used. We will determine their baseline serum HBV-DNA levels using the stored sera and enrolled those with baseline HBV-DNA levels higher than 2000 IU/mL as our historical controls. Second, we will enroll a retrospective cohort of HBV-related cirrhotic patients from 2008 who had HBV-DNA levels higher than 2000 IU/mL and received indefinite therapy of entecavir. By comparing these two cohorts, we will be able to clarify whether indefinite viral suppression by entecavir is beneficial for the cirrhotic patients. With comprehensive analysis, we wish to document that re-setting the risk level of HBV DNA from 140,000 IU/mL to 2,000 IU/mL is more beneficial for HBV-related cirrhotic patients and long-term entecavir does lower the risk of HCC further. These lines of evidence will assist in delivering appropriate and more aggressive treatment for these high-risk patients.
The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GS-4774 in adults with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) viral infection who have been virally suppressed with an oral antiviral (OAV) medication.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced adults with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced adults with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.
To prove that a study drug is noninferior to a control drug with a proportion of subjects who showed HBV DNA undetected (less than 400 copies/mL (69 IU/mL)) at the 48th week after 48-week administration of Besifovir 150 mg, or Tenofovir 300 mg as a control drug to chronic hepatitis B patients
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether HB-Vac Activated-DCs Combined With Peg-IFN or NAs has more efficacy than Peg-IFN or NAs alone in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients
Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B on long term oral antiviral therapy have to continue treatment indefinitely unless they achieve HBeAg seroconversion or HBsAg seroclearance, when therapy can be stopped. While HBeAg seroconversion is a more achievable endpoint, only 20-25% of patients develop this after one year of oral antiviral therapy. HBsAg seroclearance is universally infrequent. Strategies to improve these endpoints such as combination oral antiviral therapy have not been generally successful and recently studies have examined the possibility of switching or adding peginterferon therapy. However these have not been tested adequately in the group of patients that have been on long term oral antiviral therapy. Consequently this study was conceived to evaluate whether switching or adding peginterferon compared to continuing oral antiviral therapy are more efficacious strategies. HBeAg positive and HBeAg negative patients (n=310)will be randomised to continue oral antiviral therapy, switch or add pegylated interferon for 48 weeks in a ratio of 1:2:2 respectively. The study endpoints are HBsAg seroclearance, reduction of qHBsAg >1 log, qHBsAg<200 IU/ml, HBeAg loss and seroconversion, and HBV DNA suppression, all at week 72.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Entecavir maleate tablets in Chinese patients with hepatitis B