Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03245086
Other study ID # 934287
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received August 7, 2017
Last updated August 7, 2017
Start date August 17, 2016
Est. completion date August 2019

Study information

Verified date August 2017
Source Stony Brook University
Contact Suresh Yelika, MD
Phone 631-638-2215
Email suresh.yelika@stonybrookmedicine.edu
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will compare Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and THD in terms of one-year recurrence in a large population (N=492). Recurrence is defined as prolapsing internal hemorrhoids at physical examination performed by a colorectal surgeon.


Description:

This is a multicenter, parallel arm, non-randomized prospective data collection trial comparing Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and THD in terms of recurrence rates at one-year. All subjects will already be scheduled for either Ferguson or THD hemorrhoidectomy, the surgery is NOT part of the research. Although a randomized study would control for variation among surgeons, this study design provides the best patient safety since the surgeons will perform the technique they do most frequently. Variability in the patient population will be managed with a conservative sample size, which allows for a multivariate analysis of the sample populations if any confounding variables are noted during initial data analyses. In addition, the variability will be minimized with stringent and detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria in terms of hemorrhoidal disease. Patients will be enrolled and followed for one year. Participating surgeons will be credentialed and each participating surgeon will enroll up to ten consecutive patients.

The primary endpoint of this study is to compare Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and THD in terms of recurrence rates at one-year. Recurrence is defined as prolapsing internal hemorrhoids at physical examination performed by a colorectal surgeon.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 492
Est. completion date August 2019
Est. primary completion date August 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

Patient must be:

- At least 18 years-old

- Able to sign informed consent

- Presenting with prolapsed, non-incarcerated, reducible hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns at physical examination and scheduled for either Ferguson or THD hemorrhoidectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Any prior anorectal surgery except for conventional office-based interventions (rubber band ligation, sclerotherapy, and infrared coagulation)

- Prior pelvic radiotherapy

- Inflammatory bowel diseases

- Pre-existing fecal incontinence (Wexner score5 =8)

- Pre-existing chronic anal diseases

- Grades III and IV gynecological and obstetrical trauma per medical history and/or physical examination

- Connective tissue disorders

- Subject is pregnant

- Subject is under incarceration

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization
The hemorrhoids are operated in their natural position and not distorted by eversion The proctoscope is fully introduced transanally to reach the lower rectum. Under Doppler guidance, six arterial signals are found circumferentially above the dentate line. The approach to make the 'dearterialization' involves the transfixation of the rectal mucosa and submucosa to entrap the artery using a suture. Mucopexy is performed after the artery ligation with the same suture used for the dearterialization. Finally, the suture is tied to fix the mucopexy.
Procedure:
Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy
The hemorrhoids are operated in their natural position and not distorted by eversion. A Ferguson-Hill retractor is used to expose the hemorrhoids. Dissection with scissors is directed up to the dentate line where the fibers of the sphincter muscles are exposed and only a mucosal pedicle remains attached. A Buie-Smith crushing clamp is applied to this pedicle and the hemorrhoidal mass is excised at the superior level of the clamp. The pedicle is then ligated and the crushing clamp is removed. After dissection of the intermuscular septum is complete, the margins of the wound are drawn upward into the anal canal with stitches and are secured to the pedicle by the same suture. The remainder of the wound is closed with a stitch tied at the outer extremity of the wound using the same suture.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Stony Brook University Stony Brook New York

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Stony Brook University THD America

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (2)

FERGUSON JA, HEATON JR. Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1959 Mar-Apr;2(2):176-9. — View Citation

Ratto C, Parello A, Veronese E, Cudazzo E, D'Agostino E, Pagano C, Cavazzoni E, Brugnano L, Litta F. Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for haemorrhoids: results from a multicentre trial. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jan;17(1):O10-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12779. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary 1-year recurrence rates The primary endpoint of this study is to compare Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy and THD in terms of recurrence rates at one-year. Recurrence is defined as prolapsing internal hemorrhoids at physical examination performed by a colorectal surgeon. 1-year
Secondary Postoperative complications The secondary outcomes include postoperative complications (i.e. urinary retention, constipation, dysuria, pruritis ani, anal pain, anal stenosis, unhealed wound, fissure, fecal urgency, incontinence- flatus, incontinence- stool) 30 days
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT06216223 - Laser Versus Surgery in Anal Diseases in Inflammatory Bowel Patients N/A
Withdrawn NCT02851940 - Pain and Bleeding Following Hypertonic Saline Sclerotherapy Compared to Brand Ligation for Symptomatic Hemorrhoids N/A
Recruiting NCT02301052 - Evaluation of Allium Ampeloprasum Spp.Iranicum Cream Effect for the Management of Hemorrhoids Symptoms Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT02216305 - HAL-RAR Versus Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Grade III-IV Hemorrhoids. Prospective, Randomized Trial N/A
Completed NCT02358174 - Hemorrhoids and Metalloproteinases, Observational Study N/A
Completed NCT01483833 - Efficacy Study of Iferanserin to Treat Hemorrhoids Phase 2
Completed NCT00397137 - Stapled Anopexy Versus Closed Haemorrhoidectomy for Haemorrhoids N/A
Completed NCT00841620 - Symptom Control 1-year After Circular Stapler Anopexy or Diathermy Excision for Prolapsed Haemorhoids Phase 4
Completed NCT06459739 - Effect of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block on Hemorrhoid and Pilonidal Sinus Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04276298 - Topical Analgesia Post-Haemorrhoidectomy Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT04675177 - Polidocanol Foam VS Artery Ligation in Hemorrhoidal Disease Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05889962 - Ultrasound-guided Pudendal Nerve Block for Pain After Hemorrhoidectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT01961739 - Topical 2% Lidocaine for the Treatment of Symptomatic Hemorrhoids Phase 2/Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT02061176 - THD Versus Open Haemorrhoidectomy N/A
Withdrawn NCT00512044 - Local Versus General Anaesthesia in Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT04031131 - The Use of Topical Anaesthetic in the Banding of Internal Haemorrhoids Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04329364 - RCT Comparing Conventional Haemorrhoidectomy With Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT04567485 - Impact of Moderate to Severe Pain in the Post-intervention Monitoring Room After Hemorrhoidectomy on the Length of Stay in the Outpatient Surgery Unit
Completed NCT05247333 - Implementation of a Minor Ailment Service in Community Pharmacy Practice N/A
Completed NCT03298997 - Ligation and Hemorrhoidopexy Technique Versus Ligation of Hemorrhoidal Arteries Using Ultrasound for Hemorrhoids N/A