View clinical trials related to Hemorrhage.
Filter by:Intraoperative cell salvage is commonly used in surgeries that carry a major hemorrhagic risk to reduce the administration of allogeneic red blood cells and thus improve the outcome for the patient. When processing the salvaged blood, however, a large part of the patient's plasma is washed out. This is a disadvantage with regard to an optimal coagulation status after these types of surgeries, especially liver transplantation. There are currently various cell saver systems on the market. According to the manufacturers, the plasma is returned to the patient in different quantities as part of the processing procedure. Thus, it can be assumed that in addition to red blood cells, platelets (part of plasma) are re-transfused and contribute to an optimized coagulation. Unfortunately, there is a lack of studies in this regard in the liver transplant surgery population. The investigators aim to study the performance of two different cell saver devices regarding preservation of platelet number and function.
The goal of this clinical trial is to Explore and verify whether 40Hz audio and binaural beat 40Hz audio can improve the postoperative cognitive dysfunction seen in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were selected and randomized into intervention group (audio adjuvant group) and control group (conventional treatment group). Patients in the intervention group will receive audio therapy after surgery, and patients in the control group will receive usual care. EEG, fMRI and mRS scores were evaluated after 3 months of follow-up.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a fibrinolytic inhibitor which prevents prolonged bleeding by interfering with fibrin clot breakdown by competitively binding to lysine receptors on plasminogen; this prevents the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin. TXA will be applied to a randomly assigned side of the face during facelift surgery. The intervention groups will include 1% TXA mixed with standard local consisting 1/4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 3% TXA on TXA-soaked pledgets applied for 10 minutes, and 1% TXA with local plus 3% TXA-soaked pledgets. Each treatment arm will be compared to saline in place of TXA on the contralateral side of the face. Although TXA has been widely used in surgical fields for decades and is officially recommended by agencies such as ACOG for use during maternal hemorrhage, its current FDA approval only pertains to oral TXA for heavy menstrual bleeding and IV use for patients with hemophilia to prevent or reduce hemorrhage (cite). The main concern with intravenous TXA is the increased risk for the potential formation of blood clots, mainly in patients with clotting disorders, such as Facor V Leiden, and patients on estrogen containing medication. A recent systemic review with metanalysis by Wang et.al contained a total of 2150 patients receiving IV TXA while undergoing plastic surgery concluded that use of IV TXA does not lead to increased adverse events.[12] Given the low rate of adverse events while using TXA systemically, this protocol's application of TXA topically and/or locally negates the risk for any potential systemic adverse effects. No systemic adverse effects have been reported in studies examining local TXA in facial plastic surgery to date.
The study used a new surgical technique: intraoperative fluorescence imaging,In the 1980s, some scholars proposed the concept of intraoperative fluorescein angiography.During vitrectomy, intraoperative fluorescein angiography under 3D microscope can guide the surgeon to observe the non-perfusion area and new blood vessels on the same screen for accurate retinal photocoagulation therapy.Through this technology, the primary retinal disease can be identified in time after the removal of vitreous hemorrhage during surgery, providing effective imaging evidence support for the design of further treatment.
The BRACKETS pilot study is a multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial of prophylactic preoperative tranexamic acid (TXA) versus placebo and, using a partial factorial design, of prophylactic preoperative desmopressin versus placebo.
The goal of this study is to compare 2 medications that are commonly used to prevent excess uterine bleeding (postpartum hemorrhage, or PPH) following cesarean delivery (CD), oxytocin and carbetocin. Most of the trials evaluating the preventative role of oxytocin and carbetocin after CD have focused on patient with low-risk of PPH. This trial will focus on patients that are at increased risk of PPH, with risk factors such as: multiple gestation (twins, or more multiples), large baby, polyhydramnios (excess amniotic fluid), history of PPH, body mass index greater than 40, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and placenta previa. The investigators hypothesize that carbetocin would be more effective than an oxytocin regimen in reducing the risk of PPH in patients undergoing CD with any of the biological high-risk factors.
This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trail involved tracheostomized patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage.The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical effect of Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding vs Nasogastric Tube Feeding in Tracheostomized Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. The main questions it aims to answer are: Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, can the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding better improve the nutritional status, extubation of tracheostomy tube, pulmonary infection, neurological deficit of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Nasogastric Tube Feeding, is the Intermittent Oro-esophageal Tube Feeding safer. Participants will be divided into two groups randomly, with different nutritional support respectively.
Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at heightened risk of developing sepsis, significantly increasing mortality and healthcare burden. Currently, there is a lack of effective tools for the early prediction of sepsis in ICH patients within the ICU. This study aims to develop a reliable predictive model using machine learning techniques to assist clinicians in the early identification of patients at high risk and to facilitate timely intervention. The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV database (version 2.2) is an international online repository for critical care expertise. This database contains patient-related information collected from the ICUs of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between 2008 and 2019. It includes a vast dataset of 299,712 hospital admissions and 73,181 intensive care unit patients. The eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) comprises data from over 200,000 ICU admissions for 139,367 unique patients across 208 US hospitals between 2014 and 2015, providing a valuable resource for critical care research. This study aims to establish and validate multiple machine learning models to predict the onset of sepsis in ICU patients with ICH and to identify the model with the optimal predictive performance.
To assess the prognostic performance of the ALBI associated scores (ALBI, PALBI and INR-ALBI score) and new MELD .3 in predicting the short-term outcomes (early re-bleeding and early mortality) of patients with cirrhosis presenting with acute variceal bleeding, comparable to the CTP and MELD and MELD Na scores.
Older people falling from a standing height is the most common cause of hospital admission for head injury. Up to 1 in 3 patients admitted are taking a tablet medication which thins the blood, known as an oral anticoagulant. This type of medication can increase the likelihood of bleeding in the brain. Many patients are taking oral anticoagulation due to having an irregular heartbeat (called atrial fibrillation) or because of having a previous stroke or blood clots. When a scan shows blood in the brain, oral anticoagulation is nearly always stopped. However, this leaves the question of when it is safe to restart them. The risk of making the bleeding in the brain worse must be balanced against the risk of having a stroke or blood clots. There is no clear evidence on the safest time to restart oral anticoagulation, but most neurosurgeons advise restarting them 1-4 weeks after head injury. The number of people who have a bleed on their brain after a head injury is increasing and further brain bleeding or a stroke can have a serious effect on patients' lives and their on-going healthcare needs. Public and patient groups have highlighted that many patients want to stop taking oral anticoagulation after a bleed but they may be unaware of the vital importance of restarting this medication to prevent strokes and blood clots. The most popular oral anticoagulation prescribed has changed in recent years from warfarin to newer medications called Direct Oral Anti-Coagulants (DOACs). This trial will recruit 1084 people who are admitted to hospital with a bleed on the brain caused by a head injury who were taking oral anticoagulation before their head injury and have been prescribed a Direct Oral Anti-Coagulant (DOAC) for previously diagnosed medical condition. Patients on other Oral Anti-Coagulants, such as Warfarin may also be able to take part. The main purpose of the trial is to determine when is most beneficial time for people to start or restart a DOAC after their head injury. People will be asked to start the medication either 1 week or 4 weeks after their head injury. They will be then followed closely for 12 weeks and any major bleeding events or a blood clots (thrombotic events) such as a stroke or heart attack will be recorded. The study will also look at the person's overall quality of life, how they recover physically, the number of people who die, the costs of the treatment, and the attitudes of people and their caregivers to starting or restarting a DOAC.