View clinical trials related to Hemophilia B.
Filter by:Hemophilia is a rare X-linked bleeding disorder responsible for deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX). The main clinical manifestation is increased bleeding throughout the life which is directly correlated to the severity of the hemophilia, either mild (FVIII/FIX: 6-40), moderate (FVIII/FIX: 1-5%), or severe (FVIII/FIX<1%). Thanks to new therapies and long-term specialized follow-up by hemophilia treatment centers (HTCs), the life expectancy of patients with hemophilia (PWH) has improved considerably, even reaching that of the general population (1). Healthcare professionals are so more confronted to PWH with age-related pathologies, in particular cardiovascular pathologies such as atrial fibrillation, acute coronary syndromes or thromboembolic events (arterial or venous). It is now recommended in PWH that an anticoagulant treatment (AC) be prescribed as in the general population (2,3,4). The recently published COCHE study demonstrated a significantly increased risk of bleeding in PWH receiving antithrombotic treatment. This bleeding risk depended significantly on the type of antithrombotic treatment, which was higher for anticoagulant vs antiplatelet drugs, on basal levels of FVIII or FIX, and on the HAS-BLED score (5). Nowadays in the general population, among anticoagulant drugs, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred to vitamin K antagonist (KVA), thanks to their reduced risk of bleeding particularly intracerebral bleeding and better anticoagulant stability over time (6). However, we do not yet know precisely whether DOACs could occupy the same place in the PWH population because of the lack of evidence-based data due to the very small number of these patients, although some authors already recommend them over KVA. The KADOAH study was therefore set up to try to provide initial elements for future recommendations. Its main objective was to compare the level of bleeding risk of PWH treated with VKA vs DOACs.
This phase I study aims to evaluate the safety, PK/PD and immunogenicity of SS109 in hemophilia A or and B with inhibitors. Twenty -seven patients are enrolled in study, and divided into five dose cohorts, from 30μg/kg to 360μg/kg. Dose 1 cohort enrolls three patients, each other dose cohorts enroll six patients. All patients included in the study will continue to be followed up until 28 days after SS109 administration.
Joint pain has been reported as a major problem in people with haemophilia (PwH). Therefore, haemophilia in adults seems clinically more related to a musculoskeletal disorder than a bleeding disorder, with many patients reporting a pain intensity exceeding 6/10 on a visual analogue scale. However, although the complexity of joint pain has been studied in chronic joint pain conditions such as low back pain, osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, until present only very limited research has been done on joint pain within PwH. Therefore, exploring the underlying mechanisms and the functional implications of this intense joint pain is urgently needed. As such, the main aim of the current prospective observational study is to gain more insights in joint pain in PwH enabling us to move towards adequate pain management in PwH.
Randomized, double-blind, single-dose, 5 ways crossover, exploratory clinical trial evaluating four different doses of AryoSeven (eptacog alfa, activated) and NovoSeven on selected pharmacodynamic parameters in patients with hemophilia with inhibitors.
The purpose of this study is to validate the newly developed Hemophilia Functional Ability Scoring Tool (Hemo-FAST), which is a fast and simple scoring in haemophilia able to assess patient-reported functional mobility.
Nonacog alfa is indicated for the control and prevention of hemorrhagic episodes and for routine and surgical prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia B. The current single country, multi-centric, open label, non-randomized clinical trial is a post-approval study to fulfill the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) request for supplementary information relating to the use of nonacog alfa in Indian subjects with hemophilia B.
Freeline is developing adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector based gene therapies for a number of diseases and is actively advancing a programme in Haemophilia B (HB). This study aims to collect prospective data to characterise bleeding events and Factor IX (FIX) concentrate consumption in HB patients that can be used as baseline for participants who elect to participate in a subsequent Freeline gene therapy study. The study will also screen participants for antibodies to a novel AAV vector to assess their suitability for inclusion in a Freeline gene therapy treatment study.
This multi-center, open label Phase 1 study will evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of a single IV dose of MarzAA followed by ascending single SC doses of MarzAA in adult subjects with moderate or severe Hemophilia A or B, with or without an inhibitor.
Phase 2b, single-center, open-label study designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) prophylaxis treatment regimens with CB2679d in 6 adult, male subjects with severe congenital hemophilia B.
Phase 3/4, single arm, open-label study to evaluate PK, safety, and efficacy of APVO101 prophylaxis in severe or moderately severe hemophilia B subjects < 12 years of age.