Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04621916 |
Other study ID # |
CHLA-20-00189 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
Phase 4
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 21, 2020 |
Est. completion date |
April 20, 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
October 2023 |
Source |
Children's Hospital Los Angeles |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study will enroll children who have hemophilia A with inhibitors who successfully
completed immune tolerance induction per the ISTH criteria (negative inhibitor titer,
recovery >66% of expected, and half-life of >6 hours with their current FVIII concentrate).
Previous to emicizumab, there was only one option for these patients which was to continue
FVIII therapy in a prophylaxis mode to prevent bleeding. There was a sense that the ongoing
FVIII served to maintain tolerance however no evidence for this notion exists and in fact
what limited data is available suggests that continuing FVIII may not be necessary simply to
maintain tolerance.
To figure out this question, this will be a randomized, controlled 2 arm study which will
randomize patients post-successful ITI to emicizumab plus weekly FVIII (for maintenance of
tolerance) versus emicizumab alone. Patients will be followed for up to 2 years. We aim to
enroll 52 subjects. The FVIII weekly arm can use any factor VIII concentrate and emicizumab
is standard of care for inhibitor and non-inhibitor patients.
Description:
Background & rationale: Hemophilia A is a serious life-long genetic bleeding disorder
resulting from a mutation in the Factor VIII (FVIII) gene leading to abnormally low levels of
FVIII. Treatment consists of replacing the missing FVIII with FVIII clotting factor
concentrates (CFC). While FVIII CFC are very effective at preventing joint bleeding, they are
immunogenic such that ~30% of patients develop anti-drug antibodies which neutralize the
effect of the medications and are thus called inhibitors. Patients with inhibitors have worse
morbidity and mortality as a result of increased and more difficult to treat bleeding
episodes. Therefore, the major goal of therapy for patients who develop these antibodies is
eradication of the inhibitor. The only approach that has been shown to be effective is called
immune tolerance induction (ITI), and as its name implies, the purpose is to induce the
patient's immune system to no longer make the inhibitors. Immune tolerance induction involves
administering FVIII CFC on a regular and often intensive (daily) schedule for many months if
not years. It can be effective, however, with successful ITI ranging from 40-90% in numerous
previous studies. there exists a sizable minority of patients (~20-25% of all hemophilia A
patients) who are ITI successes. For these patients, ongoing FVIII therapy has been the
standard of treatment although once tolerization has been achieved, the treatment modality
reverts to prophylaxis, however the continued regular exposure to prophylaxis is felt to also
serve the purpose of maintaining tolerance.there is little to no data on whether ongoing
FVIII exposure is required to maintain tolerance, and it is entirely possible that patients
can discontinue routine factor therapy and not have a recurrence of their inhibitor. Only one
study has even addressed this issue, and it found that inhibitor recurrence rates were the
same among a group of tolerized patients who were subsequently adherent to a prophylaxis
regimen and another group who were not adherent and therefore not receiving regular FVIII
exposure.
While historically, this was a moot issue since the only appropriate therapy for severe
hemophilia patients following successful ITI was to be prescribed FVIII prophylaxis, the
recent licensure of a new medication has now made this question and knowledge gap very
important. Emicizumab (Hemlibra, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) is a novel, bispecific,
monoclonal antibody which can substitute for the function of activated FVIII by bringing
activated factor IX and factor X into proper alignment and induce the formation of activated
factor X.
Despite the high degree of efficacy of emicizumab for bleed prevention in inhibitor patients,
the hemophilia community has still largely taken the stance that inhibitor eradication is a
vital goal for any child who develops an inhibitor. The issue that the advent of emicizumab
has raised, however, is what to do following successful ITI. As stated, traditionally,
patients would continue FVIII therapy in the form of prophylaxis and the question of loss of
tolerance and inhibitor recurrence was moot, however given the advantages of emicizumab, it
is likely that many patients/parents will not accept continuing with the need for repeated
intravenous infusions (and central venous catheters in many children) when an alternative
agent with excellent efficacy and a much lower treatment burden exists. Thus, objective of
this study is to determine whether ongoing factor VIII therapy is required for maintenance of
tolerance.
Study population: patients who have undergone successful ITI and are currently on emicizumab
or willing to be on emicizumab.
Study methodology: This will be a prospective, randomized trial of weekly FVIII CFC therapy
versus no routine FVIII therapy for patients who have undergone successful ITI and are
currently on emicizumab or willing to be on emicizumab.
Description of study arms: Group 1 will receive ongoing once per weekly factor VIII therapy
along with emicizumab after completion of a successful ITI. Group 2 will discontinue FVIII
therapy and are on emicizumab for prophylaxis after completion of a successful ITI.
Study endpoints: Study endpoints are to find out the number of subjects that maintained
immune tolerance with/without FVIII exposure, understand the need for FVIII exposure for
maintaining immune tolerance and to estimate the treatment burden and the cost effectivity
for ongoing FVIII exposure after a successful ITI.
Follow-up: Patients will be seen every month for inhibitor recurrence until 4th month of the
study, and every two months until the first year of the study, at 18th month and at the end
of the study. If there is a bleeding episode or an inhibitor, then there will be an
unscheduled visit.
Statistics: Patients will be categorized as either having a recurrence of an inhibitor or
not. Thus, a 2x2 Chi-square contingency table will be able to group the subjects into those
who received ongoing factor VIII and those who did not and those who did versus those who did
not have an inhibitor recurrence. Fisher's exact test will be used to calculate the
difference in proportion between the groups (inhibitor-positive and inhibitor-negative).
Plans for analysis: Our goal is to complete the project including a submission for an
abstract and publication within 24 months from the start of patient accrual.