View clinical trials related to Hemophilia A.
Filter by:This study is looking at how safe it is to switch from emicizumab to Mim8, in people with haemophilia A. Mim8 is a new medicine that is used to prevent bleeding episodes in people with haemophilia A. Mim8 works by replacing the function of the missing clotting factor VIII (FVIII). Mim8 will be injected under the skin using a pen-injector either once every week, once every two weeks or once every month. The participants will be trained in using the pen injector. The participants can choose themselves, in collaboration with the study doctor how often they get Mim8 in this study. When the participant will get their first Mim8 injection depends on their current treatment with emicizumab. The participants will get their first Mim8 injection at Visit 2. Participants will have between 6 and 27 Mim8 injections. The total number of injections participants will have depends on their dosing frequency. The study will last for about 6-12 months. While taking part in this study, there are some restrictions about what medicine participant can use. The study doctor will tell the participants more about this. In case the participants experience bleeds, these can be treated with additional haemostatic medicine as agreed with the study doctor. Female participants cannot take part if they are pregnant, breast-feeding or plan to get pregnant during the study period.
Emicizumab (Hemlibra®) is a subcutaneous hemostatic treatment approved in 2019 for the prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A. Emicizumab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody mimicking factor VIIIa that provides a constant level of coagulation similar to that observed in minor haemophilia A patients whose factor VIII level is 10-15%. Although the correction of plasma coagulation in vivo is only partial, emicizumab strongly shortens the in vitro coagulation times involving the intrinsic pathway such as aPTT(activated partial thromboplastin time). The investigators will evaluate the effect of emicizumab on a coagulation test (Activating clotting time (ACT i-STAT Alinity)) used as a point of care device to monitor heparin therapies during cardiac surgeries (cardiopulmonary bypass) and cardiac catheterizations. Because ACT is activated through the intrinsic pathway, it may also be shortened by emicizumab. Prophylactic treatment with emicizumab would make it impossible to use ACT for heparin therapy in a hemophiliac patient benefiting from this treatment. The aim of this in vitro study is to assess the effect of emicizumab on the in vitro heparin-induced ACT increase in severe hemophilia A patients treated with emicizumab and in healthy volunteers (measurement on the i- STAT Alinity) thanks to in vitro blood spiking experiments. Some data have already been published with other ACT devices (Hemochron..) but never with the i-STAT Alinity device which uses a different technology and other reagents.
The goal of this low-interventional study is to describe the overall joint health in patients with haemophilia A or haemophilia B prophylactically treated with rFVIIIFc or rFIXFc. The main question it aims to answer is the: • Evaluation of the overall joint status as detected by ultrasound in haemophilia A and B patients treated with rFVIIIFc or rFIXFc prophylaxis over the 18-month study period. Participants will come to 6-monthly visits during the 18-month long study period and will perform an ultrasound with the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) protocol at each visit. At baseline and end of study visits, the patients will be assessed with the clinical scoring system Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) and complete patient questionnaires. Retrospective data from patient medical records will also be collected for at least 6 months before enrolment in the study.
To evaluate the time of response, sustained remission rate and relapse rate of CD38 monoclonal antibody (Daratumumab) combined corticosteroid in the treatment of AHA. To evaluate the safety of CD38 monoclonal antibody in the treatment of AHA.
FREEDOM is a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3b study in Europe that aims to enrol approximately 90 previously treated severe haemophilia A patients aged ≥12 years, currently on prophylaxis. After a run-in period of 30-45 days, patients will receive efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis, 50 IU/kg once-weekly for 24 months (additional preventive dose not permitted). An activity tracker and an electronic patient diary will be used to collect data on physical activity, bleeds, factor dosing, pain, and injuries from screening throughout the study. The primary objective is to describe changes in physical activities over 24 months on efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis, with a primary endpoint of change from baseline in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) at month 24. Secondary objectives include relationship between physical activity and other variables (bleeds, joint status, pain, injuries, and quality of life); changes in joint status as assessed by HEAD-US, HJHS and MRI; occurrence of bleeds, injuries, pain. Safety and tolerability of efanesoctocog alfa will also be evaluated.
Hemophilia is a rare X-linked bleeding disorder responsible for deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX). The main clinical manifestation is increased bleeding throughout the life which is directly correlated to the severity of the hemophilia, either mild (FVIII/FIX: 6-40), moderate (FVIII/FIX: 1-5%), or severe (FVIII/FIX<1%). Thanks to new therapies and long-term specialized follow-up by hemophilia treatment centers (HTCs), the life expectancy of patients with hemophilia (PWH) has improved considerably, even reaching that of the general population (1). Healthcare professionals are so more confronted to PWH with age-related pathologies, in particular cardiovascular pathologies such as atrial fibrillation, acute coronary syndromes or thromboembolic events (arterial or venous). It is now recommended in PWH that an anticoagulant treatment (AC) be prescribed as in the general population (2,3,4). The recently published COCHE study demonstrated a significantly increased risk of bleeding in PWH receiving antithrombotic treatment. This bleeding risk depended significantly on the type of antithrombotic treatment, which was higher for anticoagulant vs antiplatelet drugs, on basal levels of FVIII or FIX, and on the HAS-BLED score (5). Nowadays in the general population, among anticoagulant drugs, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred to vitamin K antagonist (KVA), thanks to their reduced risk of bleeding particularly intracerebral bleeding and better anticoagulant stability over time (6). However, we do not yet know precisely whether DOACs could occupy the same place in the PWH population because of the lack of evidence-based data due to the very small number of these patients, although some authors already recommend them over KVA. The KADOAH study was therefore set up to try to provide initial elements for future recommendations. Its main objective was to compare the level of bleeding risk of PWH treated with VKA vs DOACs.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the changes of antibodies and inhibitors against the coagulation factor VIII in patients with severe hemophilia A receiving emicizumab therapy. No additional visits or procedures are planned. Patients in this study will continue to receive their routine care and analysis will be done from left over samples from routine visits.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of prophylactic SerpinPC in participants with Hemophilia B with inhibitors, as part of the SerpinPC registrational program.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of prophylactic SerpinPC administered subcutaneously (SC) to participants with severe hemophilia A (HemA) (with or without inhibitors) or moderately severe to severe hemophilia B (HemB) (without inhibitors) as part of the SerpinPC registrational program. This study consists of 3 parts: Part 1: dose-justification phase, Part 2: dose-confirmatory phase, Part 3: extension phase for participants who complete either Part 1 or Part 2. This adaptive design study has a randomized dose-justification component to investigate the efficacy and safety of SerpinPC as a therapeutic option, principally for participants with HemB without inhibitors. SerpinPC has a novel mechanism of action compared with marketed treatments and those that are in development.
The BMN 270 clinical development program consists of multiple interventional studies designed to assess the safety and efficacy of a single infusion of BMN 270 for at least 5 years post-infusion. This long-term follow-up study is needed to help further understand the long-term safety of BMN 270 beyond 5 years and to assess the durability of efficacy.