Hemiparesis Clinical Trial
Official title:
An Investigation Into Music Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients
Impairment of arm function is more common than lower limb impairment in stroke patients and
is also more resistant to treatment. Several clinical trials with stroke patients have
produced statistically significant gains in upper limb function when using instrumental
playing and treatments where rhythm supports the priming and timing of movements. Based on
the positive results from controlled and non-controlled trials, the Cochrane review of music
therapy for acquired brain injury (Bradt, et al., 2010) recommends further investigation
into rhythm based techniques to treat hemiparesis in stroke patients, and that future
studies need to examine the relationship between the frequency and duration of interventions
and treatment effects.
The aim of this study is to examine whether or not a thirty minute, twice weekly, six week,
home music therapy treatment, playing set musical patterns on instruments to music is
feasible to deliver, and will lead to improved coordination, dexterity and activities of
daily living in hemiparetic stroke patients.
Twelve patients will be recruited from Cambridgeshire Community Services NHS trust (CCS) who
are between one month and two years post stroke with hemiparesis. Participants will have
completed and been discharged from community rehabilitation for their upper limb and not be
receiving any other treatment for arm function. They will be randomised into two groups:
treatment (for immediate treatment following discharge from community rehab) and waiting
list (beginning 9 weeks after baseline measure). Participants will be assessed at the
beginning and end of treatment (just before starting and just after completing 6 weeks of
treatment) by one of two experienced community occupational therapists under contract with
CCS, who are also experienced in working with stroke patients and who will be blind to the
experiment. The other three measures will be conducted by the chief investigator. The
assessment tools will be the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and nine hole peg test (9HPT).
There will also be a pre and post treatment semi-structured interview for each participant,
which will be conducted by the chief investigator. ARAT and 9HPT assessments will be
administered to all participants at the same time points: baseline and then at week 6, 9, 15
and 18. Data will be analysed to determine if the treatment is effective compared to no
treatment (wait list) following community discharge, and whether earlier intervention
(treatment group) yields better results for participants, all of whom will eventually
receive treatment.
CROSSOVER DESIGN After the stroke patients have finished their upper limb rehabilitation
with CCS and are no longer receiving any physiotherapy or occupational therapy to improve
it, this study aims to establish if their upper limb function is maintained, deteriorates,
or improves. In order to do this the investigators will have a waiting list group who wait 9
weeks after the end of their CCS rehabilitation but are assessed at the same time points
after their baseline measure as the treatment group. This enables us to compare the results
of the treatment group with the waiting list group, in other words 'treatment compared to no
treatment after CCS rehab has ended', and establish if the music therapy has been effective.
The investigators can also compare the results of both groups and determine if the
participants who received music therapy earlier performed any differently than the waiting
list group.
The five repeated measures using the ARAT and 9HPT also allow each participant to be
measured against themselves, comparing treatment with no treatment and establishing how the
exercises using the musical instruments (TIMP treatment) have influenced their paretic arm
use during activities of daily living.
STUDY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The study goal is to investigate the feasibility of delivering this music therapy treatment
in stroke patients' homes twice a week for six weeks with the objective of answering the
primary research question, which is:
1. Does TIMP improve upper limb function after statutory rehabilitation has ceased to be
effective and consequently ended?
The Secondary objectives are to try and determine:
2. Is TIMP more effective when delivered immediately after statutory rehabilitation has
ended compared to 9 weeks later ?
3. How do participants experience TIMP?
STUDY DESIGN
In order to answer the research questions a wait list, crossover design will be used, with
twelve participants randomly assigned to two groups:
A = treatment B = wait list Randomisation will be achieved using an envelope system, with
twelve sealed envelopes containing folded pieces of paper, six with the word 'treatment' and
six with the word 'wait list' written on them. Each time a patient consents to
participation, the chief investigator will contact the statistician and ask him to open an
envelope and read the piece of paper inside.
There can be enormous variability between patients in terms of speed of recovery following
stroke and so the inclusion criteria for 'time since stroke' is quite broad. There is no
clear data that fully confirms differences in degrees of upper limb paresis based on type or
site of stroke and so all types and sites are included.
Inclusion criteria for the study is as follows:
1. Can consent to treatment
2. aged 18-70
3. has completed community rehabilitation for upper limb paresis
4. any type and site of stroke
5. between 1 month and 2 years post stroke
6. can lift paretic hand onto a table whilst seated, without assistance from unaffected
hand
7. some finger movement, which could be extension of one or more fingers
8. not receiving any other treatment for upper limb paresis during the course of this
study (18 weeks from baseline measure)
Once treatment begins, each participant will receive two, thirty minute music therapy
sessions per week for six weeks. All participants will eventually receive treatment. Group A
will begin music therapy immediately after completing their baseline assessment using ARAT
and 9HPT and completing the semi-structured interview. This means that the first session
will require approximately two hours in order to allow for setting up equipment and breaks
for the participant. In the event that the participant is too tired following the assessment
to continue with the treatment, then the music therapy session will be rescheduled for
another day in the same week. The end measure will also take place on the same day as the
twelfth and final session and if the participant is too tired to complete the end assessment
then it will be rescheduled for another day in the same week.
METHODOLOGY
RECRUITMENT Patients who have completed their CCS community occupational and physiotherapy
rehabilitation will be sent a letter of invitation to participate in this study and an
information sheet (see attached 'Letter of Invitation' and 'participant information sheet').
In the letter they will be asked to contact the chief investigator if they are interested in
participating, explaining that he will answer any questions that they have about
participation and arrange to visit them in their home in order to demonstrate some of the
exercises. Then, if they are interested the chief investigator will leave a consent form for
them to sign and return within a week.
RANDOMISATION Once a participant has given informed consent, the chief investigator will
contact the statistician (Mike Parker, medical statistician, Anglia University, Chelmsford)
and ask him to open one of 12 envelopes, which will have either 'treatment' or 'waiting
list' written on a piece of paper inside and indicate which group the participant will go
into.
ASSESSMENTS The primary outcome measure will be the Action Research Arm Test (Lyle 1981. See
diagram 12 under 'Appendix'), which has been used in similar studies (Schneider; 2007,
Altenmueller; 2009, Grau-Sanchez; 2013) thus enabling some comparison of data with this
study. It is a 19 item measure that is divided into four categories: grasp, grip, pinch and
gross movement. Each item, or action, is performed by the participant while seated a
measured distance from a table (15cm), where all of the assessment items are placed (blocks
of wood of various sizes, smaller items, etc). The test recreates the movements or sequences
of movements common to activities of daily living, such as reaching up onto a shelf to pick
up a can of soup. A table map for the ARAT is laid out flat on the table top and this has
markers on it to indicate the start and end position for each object used in the test, thus
optimising consistency between patients and setting.
The performance of each task is timed using a stopwatch, and scored according to a
standardised scale.
The assessment can take up to 30 minutes if the patient needs to complete all items in every
subcategory, but this is rare. The test usually takes approximately 10 minutes.
The secondary outcome measure is the 9 hole peg test (Kellor et al, 1971). This is a test
that the Cambridgeshire Community Services team (host to this study) use. It is a timed test
measuring finger dexterity using standardised equipment comprising a rectangular plastic
tray with a rounded, concave tray at one end containing nine small white pegs and at the
other end nine holes into which the participant must (one at a time) place the nine pegs
from the tray and then remove them, placing them back into the tray as quickly as possible.
The patient practices with the unaffected hand first, then the paretic side. The patient is
seated while performing the test. A non-slip mat is placed between the base of the peg test
and the table surface. The participant may stabilise the test base if necessary using their
unaffected hand. The test takes no more than 2 minutes to administer, depending on the age
of the patient and their existing degree of finger dexterity.
SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEW Before beginning the music therapy treatment each participant will
be asked set questions about it and to score how much they think it will improve their
paretic arm use in activities of daily living. At the end of treatment participants will be
asked the same questions. The chief investigator will write down responses during the
interview for later thematic analysis. Interviews will not be recorded. Questions have been
used that are as open as possible so as to give participants the opportunity to express
their preconceptions and thoughts. Each question may lead to further questions, for example
question 1 may prompt a response 'I think it will help me" to which the chief investigator
may respond "how might it help you?" The purpose of the semi-structured interview is to
gather qualitative data specifically regarding how participants experienced the treatment.
The pre and post questions are set out below.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01662960 -
Visual Feedback Therapy for Treating Individuals With Hemiparesis Following Stroke
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03780296 -
Implementing Technology Enhanced Real Time Action Observation Therapy in Persons With Chronic Stroke
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03605381 -
MORbidity PRevalence Estimate In StrokE
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05163210 -
Effectiveness of AOT Based on Virtual Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation.
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04113525 -
Transcutaneous Spinal and Peripheral Stimulation and Wrist Robotic Therapy for Patients With Spastic Stroke
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01948739 -
Brain Machine Interface Control of an Robotic Exoskeleton in Training Upper Extremity Functions in Stroke
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03237520 -
Comparing Virtual Reality Therapy With Modified-CIMT Versus Modified-CIMT Alone in Hemiparetic Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03080454 -
The Role of Trans-spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in Treating Patients With Hand Spasticity After Stroke
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Suspended |
NCT01519843 -
Post Stroke Motor Learning
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01651533 -
Mental Practice in Chronic, Stroke Induced Hemiparesis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01106755 -
Effects of Ground Level Gait Training With Body Weight Support (BWS) and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00170716 -
Safety and Effectiveness of Cortical Stimulation in the Treatment of Stroke Patients With Upper Extremity Hemiparesis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04286997 -
VARA (Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Rehabilitation): Motor Rehabilitation Protocol With GRAIL for Patients Affected by Hemiparesis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05856669 -
The Effects of Mirror-Based Virtual Reality Systems and Recalibration Software on Upper Extremity Function in Individuals Experiencing Hemiparesis Post-Stroke
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05801874 -
Gait and Posture Analysis in Hemiparetic Patients Through Optoelectronic Systems, "Smart" Tools and Clinical Evaluation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05590988 -
Sensorimotor Arm Rehabilitation After Stroke
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04536987 -
Robot Therapy for Rehabilitation of Hand Movement After Stroke
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04694833 -
Telerehabilitation Through Serious Games in Virtual Reality in a Stroke Population (AutoRReVi)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03965403 -
Upper Extremity Rehabilitation With the BURT Robotic Arm
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03638570 -
Altered Connections in the Spinal Cord to Reduce Hand Impairment After Stroke
|
N/A |