View clinical trials related to Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic.
Filter by:Puerto Rico Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (PREMMA) trial is a multi-center, parallel, prospective, superiority, randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation comparing reoperation rates and neurological outcomes in patients with chronic subdural hematoma that receive treatment via embolization of the middle meningeal artery versus surgical evacuation via burr hole trephination or craniotomy.
A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter trail is designed to compare differences of operation rate and clinical outcome from treatment up to 24 weeks between HXLS group and placebo group.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test in moderately symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) patients if middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) can be used as an alternative to conventional open surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Compared to open conventional surgery, does MMAE reduce the need for rescue surgery or deaths? - What is the safety of MMAE and conventional open surgery in these patients? Participants will be asked to: - Share their medical history and undergo physical examinations - Have blood drawn - Have CT scans of the head - Answer questionnaires - Undergo MMAE or conventional open surgery - Provide information about possible adverse events Researchers will compare participants in the MMAE group with those in the conventional open surgery group to see if there is a reduced need for rescue surgery or deaths and evaluate safety.
Background: Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a type of intracranial bleeding, predominantly affecting the elderly and males, with an estimated incidence of 8/100.000. The collection of subdural fluid expands slowly, leading eventually to brain tissue compression that results in neurological impairment such as seizures, cognitive decline, and paresis. Most patients need neurosurgical evacuation of the blood to improve and to prevent further, possibly permanent deterioration. Evidently, the cause of such a bleeding must be investigated and if possible treated, or preventive strategies need to be installed if possible. Spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks are a known cause of cSDH but are widely underdiagnosed in this population. The spinal CSF leak causes CSF loss that leads to intracranial hypotension, expansion of intracerebral veins, and traction to the brain and the surrounding tissues. A cSDH is a severe complication of such a leak and occurs in about 30% of all cases with a predominance among the elderly. It is crucial to identify these patients with a spinal leak as treatment pathways differ essentially from patients without a leak. Some smaller studies indicated a prevalence of spinal CSF leaks among cSDH patients of 30% to 80% depending on selection criteria (age, extend of cSDH). Notably, the entity of the CSF-venous fistula, that has been discovered as recent as 9 years ago, and that by now is accounting for 20-25% of all spinal leaks, has not been considered in previous research on cSDH and spinal CSF leaks. Currently, there is no prospective data on spinal CSF leaks in patients with cSDH. Establishment of such data is crucial to improve diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms for spinal CSF leaks in patients with cSDH. Objective: To prospectively assess the prevalence of spinal CSF leaks in patients with cSDH Methods: This is a prospective observational, monocentric study on patients admitted due to cSDH to the Department of Neurosurgery at the Medical Center of the University of Freiburg. Treatment and diagnostic procedures will follow standard protocols. The number of spinal CSF leaks will be assessed to generate the prevalence of spinal CSF leaks in this patient cohort. Furthermore, clinical data, the specific type of the CSF leak, and imaging parameters are assessed systematically to estimate the diagnostic value of these measures.
Embotrial-1 is an Italian multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial with open-label treatment and blinded outcome assessment (PROBE) to assess the superiority of MMA embolization compared to conservative treatment. The intervention group is MMA embolization and comparator control group is the conservative management with best medical treatment. Patients are randomized 1:1.
Chronic Subdural Hematomas (cSHD) are common, and due to cerebral compression, often result in neurological impairment and reduced consciousness. Surgery is typically performed once neurological symptoms develop. Recent studies suggest that arteries nourished by the middle meningeal artery (MMA) may be responsible for hematoma progression and that MMA embolization is clinically useful. There is less evidence, that embolization of MMA also may be a treatment option for individuals without surgical treatment. The investigators propose a multicentre study to investigate both potentials: (1) Assessment of efficacy of embolization after surgery to reduce recurrence and improve outcomes by conducting a randomized trial (randomization arms; Arms 1 and 2), (2) Assessment of embolization-alone efficacy when surgery is contraindicated or refused (embolization-only arm, Arms 3 and 4).
Chronic subdural hematomas are frequent neurosurgical issues that are most often treated with burr hole craniectomies to drain the subdural fluid. At the chronic stage, a subdural hematoma is more liquified and easily washed out through burr hole openings. However, it often requires frequent imaging and monitoring to ensure that fluid does not reaccumulate in the subdural space, that the washout was adequate, and that further intervention/repeat intervention is not required, particularly if the patient develops acute changes in neurologic status or lacks improvement in initial symptomatology. Therefore, these patients require multiple repeated CT head images during their inpatient and post-operative follow-up course. This leads to high radiation doses to patients and high-cost burden. The Longeviti ClearFit Cover was developed to allow for ultrasound imaging through the implanted cover. The skull's acoustic properties prevent ultrasound from being used through the bone, therefore limiting its use in post-operative neurosurgical patients. Using ultrasound would remove the need for high radiation doses with CT, could be done very quickly and easily at bedside or in the clinic to check subdural space or ventricle size, and is much lower cost. This ClearFit implant would be utilized in place of a burr hole cover, typically titanium, that is implanted in most other cases. The aim of this study is to prospectively assess patients with surgically treated chronic subdural hematomas via craniectomy that have the craniectomy site covered with the Longeviti ClearFit, compared retrospectively to a matched cohort of patients that had their craniectomy site for the same procedure covered with the typically used titanium/metal. This will allow us to determine if this new implant results in reduced need for repeated CT imaging by utilizing bedside clinician-performed ultrasound and reduces overall cost for patients.
Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common problems treated by neurosurgeons, particularly as the population ages. While often dismissed as a benign problem, it has become clear that cSDH is associated with worse long term functional and cognitive outcomes compared to matched controls. Though surgical techniques for treatment of cSDH are becoming more effective and safe, a persisting problem of fluctuating, stroke-like neurological deficits has re-emerged. Such deficits are not always directly related to hematoma mass effect and not always relieved with surgical decompression, but can result in prolonged hospital course, additional workup, and sometimes even additional invasive treatments. While the cause of such events is unknown, we recently documented for the first time that massive waves of spreading depolarization can occur in these patients and were closely linked to such neurologic deficits in some patients. In the current study, we plan to expand on these preliminary findings with rigorous, standardized application of post operative subdural electrocorticography monitoring, pioneered at our institution to detect SD. We also plan to build on our large retrospective analysis estimating the overall incidence of such deficits in cSDH patients by assessing multiple proposed risk factors for SD. In addition, for the first time, we will assess the short- and long-term consequences of cSDH and SD with detailed functional, cognitive, and headache related outcome measurement. These assessments are based on several remarkable cases we have observed with time-locked neurologic deterioration associated with recurrent SD. This study qualifies as a mechanistic clinical trial in that we will be prospectively assigning patients to the intervention of SD monitoring and assessing outcomes related to the occurrence of SD. This constitutes the application of a novel measure of brain signaling and assessing biomarkers of these physiologic processes of SD. These studies will provide critically needed information on this novel mechanism for neurologic deficits and worse outcomes after cSDH evacuation. Upon successful completion, we would identify a targetable mechanism for poor outcomes that occur commonly in patients with cSDH. This overall strategy offers the opportunity to radically improve the care of patients with cSDH by focusing on clinical trials of pharmacologic therapies for neurologic deficits in patients with cSDH.
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), a common disease after minor head trauma, is characterized by blood collection in the subdural space, which can result in severe neurological impairment. The current standard of care is the surgical evacuation of CSDH. Although clinical and surgical outcomes are satisfying in most cases, considerable morbidity, mortality and recurrence rates of 3-31% are frequently reported. Therefore a non-surgical approach to treat CSDH is desirable. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic drug, has been shown to decrease hematoma volume in a small cohort of CSDH patients. The present study is designed to test the hypothesis that TXA can reduce the volume of CSDH. Volume measurements of residual CSDH after burr-hole surgery will be performed to quantify treatment success. The trial is designed as a double-blinded randomized controlled trial, where half of the patients will be assigned to daily intake of TXA, whereas the other half will receive placebo. The primary endpoint is defined as volume change in milliliter after 4-8 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints are hematoma volume at 8-12 weeks, patient safety, the number of patients with resolution of the CSDH after 4-8 and 8-12 weeks of study participation, the neurological outcome, the rate of reoperation, the time to reoperation, drug safety and compatibility, and participant quality of life (QOL).
DECIDE (Bedside versus Operating Room Burr-Hole DrainagE of ChronIc SubDural HEmatoma) CSDH is an abnormal collection of blood between the layers of the brain causing brain tissue compression leading to neurological complications. One of the most common risk factors contributing to CSDH is head trauma, which is usually in the form of a minor head injury. Older individuals are at increased risk of CSDH due to brain atrophy that occurs with advancing age as well as their tendency to fall and sustain minor head traumas. Chronic alcoholics are also at increased risk as alcoholism also leads to brain atrophy, increased risk of falls, and liver failure which results in increased bleeding risk. Also many drugs used today like anticoagulants, antithrombotics, and antiplatelets for certain health conditions are other common risk factors for CSDH. The overall goal of this multi-centered trial in the USA and Canada is to assess the surgical management of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) and to demonstrate the effectiveness of bedside drainage and its safety as it bypasses the perioperative risk associated with anesthetic especially among the elderly. Adult patients with a clear indication for CSDH drainage will be randomly assigned to one of two procedures. One group will receive the twist drill procedure which can be performed at the bedside. The second group will undergo the burr-hole drainage procedure in the operating room usually under general anesthetic. Typically, the twist drill procedure can occur sooner as the operating room and Anesthetist are not required. Reoccurrence of the CSDH will be assessed over a period of 6 months following drainage. Timing of procedure, risk of infection, adverse side effects and neurological functioning will also be measured. Over a 3 year study period, 486 eligible patients (243 patients per arm) will be enrolled. Patients > 18 years with confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic CSDH will be provided one of the two procedures and will be followed for study outcomes at 1, 3 and 6 months following the procedure. Primary analysis will be to compare the surgical procedures, assessing the recurrence rate of CSDH within 6 months of initial CSDH drainage. The ultimate goal of this study is to standardize bedside drainage as the treatment of choice for CSDH management. This trial is important in the ongoing search for more efficient and safe intervention strategies.