Hematologic Diseases Clinical Trial
Official title:
Lavender Oil Aromatherapy for The Treatment of Acute Anxiety During Bone Marrow Biopsy Procedures
NCT number | NCT05102331 |
Other study ID # | CASE4Z21 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Withdrawn |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | August 2021 |
Est. completion date | August 2022 |
Verified date | November 2021 |
Source | Case Comprehensive Cancer Center |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of lavender oil as compared to standard of care (SOC) to relieve anxiety in participants undergoing a bone marrow aspirate and biopsy procedure
Status | Withdrawn |
Enrollment | 0 |
Est. completion date | August 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 19 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients must have the ability to understand and sign a written informed consent document, and be willing to follow protocol requirements - Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status = 1 - Willingness to comply with all study interventions of lavender oil aromatherapy - Anxiety >3 on a 0-10 visual analog scale regarding the bone marrow biopsy/aspirate procedure Exclusion Criteria: - Allergy to lavender oil - Mental incapacitation (ex. stroke, brain metastasis etc.) that would cause inability to follow directions, in the opinion of the investigators - Ongoing uncontrolled active psychiatric condition that would interfere in the conduct of the study (e.g., mood disorders, anxiety, psychosis disorders, or substance use), as determined by the patient's primary cancer team. - If a patient has a history of a psychiatric disorder, we will contact their primary cancer team to determine if their condition is controlled or uncontrolled, and if it will interfere with the study. - Currently pregnant - Recent changes in the past 2 weeks to medications prescribed for pain or anxiety |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Anxiety scores from post-procedure questionnaire | Efficacy of LOA as compared to SOC to relieve acute anxiety in participants undergoing a BMAB procedure will be assessed by comparing anxiety scores from a post-procedure questionnaire that asks "What was the highest level of anxiety that you experienced during the procedure?"
The primary analysis will compare difference scores from this anxiety score between the two groups using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test (Higher the score more is the anxiety). |
Within fifteen minutes post-BMAB | |
Primary | State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores - Baseline | The STAI measure one's conscious awareness at two extremes of anxiety affect, labeled state anxiety (A-state), and trait anxiety (A-trait), respectively.
The STAI includes 20 questions about how the participant is feeling (e.g. I feel worried), each ranging from 1 to 4, with 1 indicating "not at all" and 4 indicating "very much so". Full scale ranges from 40 to 160, with higher STAI scores suggesting higher levels of anxiety. This study will use STAI at baseline and then the state anxiety inventory short form (SAI-SF) for the subsequent time points. |
Within fifteen minutes pre-BMAB | |
Primary | SAI-SF scores | The SAI-SF utilizes six questions from the STAI state questionnaire to assess state anxiety and has shown similar results to the full form. Scores range from 6 to 24, with higher scores indicating worse anxiety.
Questions relate to feeling: calm, tense, upset, relaxed, content and worried |
Within fifteen minutes post-BMAB | |
Secondary | Pain scores based on the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) | Efficacy of LOA to relieve acute pain as measured by BPI-SF scores.
Item 1: Yes/No question assessing if participants are currently experiencing pain other than minor headache, sprain, or toothache. Item 2: Aks participants to indicate on a whole body diagram the exact location of pain. Items 3-6: Measure severity of pain on a 0-10 numeric scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating pain as bad as you can imagine Item 7: Asks "what treatment or medications are you receiving for your pain?" Item 8: Assesses relief from pain treatments or medications within the last 24 hours, scored by "percent of relief received" from 0% to 100%, at 10% increments, with 0% indicating no relief, and 100% indicating complete relief Item 9 includes 7 sub-ratings regarding the impact that pain within the previous 24 hours on quality of life. Each sub-rating is scored from 0 to 10 with 0 indicating that pain does not interfere, and 10 indicating pain completely interferes. |
Within fifteen minutes pre-BMAB | |
Secondary | Pain scores based on the BPI-SF | Efficacy of LOA to relieve acute pain as measured by BPI-SF scores.
Item 1: Yes/No question assessing if participants are currently experiencing pain other than minor headache, sprain, or toothache. Item 2: Aks participants to indicate on a whole body diagram the exact location of pain. Items 3-6: Measure severity of pain on a 0-10 numeric scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating pain as bad as you can imagine Item 7: Asks "what treatment or medications are you receiving for your pain?" Item 8: Assesses relief from pain treatments or medications within the last 24 hours, scored by "percent of relief received" from 0% to 100%, at 10% increments, with 0% indicating no relief, and 100% indicating complete relief Item 9 includes 7 sub-ratings regarding the impact that pain within the previous 24 hours on quality of life. Each sub-rating is scored from 0 to 10 with 0 indicating that pain does not interfere, and 10 indicating pain completely interferes. |
Within fifteen minutes post-BMAB | |
Secondary | Pain scores based on Edmonton Symptom Assessment Score (ESAS) | Average pain symptom scores as measured by ESAS
The ESAS measures responses to 10 common symptoms (pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, shortness of breath, appetite, feelings of well-being, and other symptom). Participants rate the intensity of symptoms during the last 24 hours on 0 to 10 numerical scales from 0 no symptom to 10 worst possible symptoms. |
Within fifteen minutes pre-BMAB | |
Secondary | Pain scores based on ESAS | Average pain symptom scores as measured by ESAS
The ESAS measures responses to 10 common symptoms (pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, shortness of breath, appetite, feelings of well-being, and other symptom). Participants rate the intensity of symptoms during the last 24 hours on 0 to 10 numerical scales from 0 no symptom to 10 worst possible symptoms. |
Within fifteen minutes post-BMAB | |
Secondary | Anxiety scores based on ESAS | Average anxiety symptom scores as measured by ESAS
The ESAS measures responses to 10 common symptoms (pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, shortness of breath, appetite, feelings of well-being, and other symptom). Participants rate the intensity of symptoms during the last 24 hours on 0 to 10 numerical scales from 0 no symptom to 10 worst possible symptoms. A mixed effect regression model with the anxiety scores from the ESAS will be fit to assess association between groups and outcomes. The study team will also test for time effects and for a group by time interaction effect. |
Within fifteen minutes pre-BMAB | |
Secondary | Anxiety scores based on ESAS | Average anxiety symptom scores as measured by ESAS
The ESAS measures responses to 10 common symptoms (pain, fatigue, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, shortness of breath, appetite, feelings of well-being, and other symptom). Participants rate the intensity of symptoms during the last 24 hours on 0 to 10 numerical scales from 0 no symptom to 10 worst possible symptoms. A mixed effect regression model with the anxiety scores from the ESAS will be fit to assess association between groups and outcomes. The study team will also test for time effects and for a group by time interaction effect. |
Within fifteen minutes post-BMAB | |
Secondary | Pre-BMAB Questionnaire | A survey will be offered to those who decline to enroll in order to further understand why they chose not to participate in the study. Survey consists of 6 likert-style questions scored from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating more agreement with statements. Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more agreement with the statement.
Also includes an opportunity to list "other reasons" for not participating |
Within fifteen minutes pre-BMAB | |
Secondary | Post-BMAB Questionnaire | A survey will be offered to those who enroll on the study to fully understand their experience with LOA treatments, assess patients' satisfaction with the lavender oil treatment, if they would be interested in lavender oil for future BMA, and their experience in the clinical trial as a whole. These questions will be based on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Treatment Satisfaction - General (FACIT-TS-G) questionnaire and tailored to lavender oil aromatherapy.
Survey consists of 2 sections of 4 likert-style questions (agreement and satisfaction, respectively), with each question scored from 0 to 4 (total section score ranges from 0 to 32, with higher scores indicating more agreement or satisfaction. 3 additional yes/no/maybe questions relating to whether participant experience and satisfaction follow. One additional open-ended question leaves room fore participants to enter other comments. |
Within fifteen minutes post-BMAB | |
Secondary | Percent of patients that decline the study | Feasibility, as measure by percent of patients that decline the study
If >50% of patients agree to participate and if >50% are able to complete the lavender oil treatment, the study will be determined feasible |
Within fifteen minutes pre-BMAB | |
Secondary | Percent of participants completing the study | Completion rate, as measured by percent of participants completing the study with 95% confidence intervals, with "completion" defined as receiving lavender oil treatments as described. Each participant will be assigned one of the following categories:
completed treatment course incomplete treatment course 9) unknown (not assessable, insufficient data) If >50% of patients agree to participate and if >50% are able to complete the lavender oil treatment, the study will be determined feasible |
Within fifteen minutes post-BMAB | |
Secondary | length of time of the BMAB procedure | length of time of the BMAB procedure will be compared between LOA versus SOC | Within fifteen minutes post-BMAB |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04094844 -
Health Information Technology System ("Roadmap 2.0") in the Context of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04474678 -
Quality Improvement Project - "My Logbook! - I Know my Way Around!"; ("Mein Logbuch - Ich Kenne Mich Aus!")
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03918343 -
Lipopolysaccharide Metabolism and Identification of Potential Biomarkers Predictive of Graft-versus-host Disease After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01445561 -
Ultra Low Dose Interleukin-2 in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06148610 -
Evaluation of the Impact of the Use of NewSpringForMe on Transplanted Patients' Quality of Life and Support
|
||
Completed |
NCT04168983 -
Impact of Sophrology on the Pain Felt During a Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05969821 -
Clonal Hematopoiesis of Immunological Significance
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT04282174 -
CD34+ Enriched Transplants From HLA-Compatible Patients With Hematologic Malignancies
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01108159 -
Integrated Whole-Genome Analysis of Hematologic Disorders
|
||
Completed |
NCT00800839 -
Busulfan and Fludarabine Followed by Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00213239 -
A Dose Finding Study of Remifentanil and Propofol for Lumbar Punctures in Children
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT00208949 -
A Comparison of Dendritic Cell Content and T-Cell Phenotype Between Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF + Granulocyte Macrophage (GM)-CSF
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT00176826 -
T-Cell Depletion and Stem Cell Transplant for Immune Deficiencies and Histiocytic Disorders
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00208962 -
Allogeneic Cell Therapy for Adults With Hematologic Malignancies
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00000603 -
Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Study (COBLT)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00000587 -
Erythropoietin for Anemia Due to Zidovudine in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03655678 -
A Safety and Efficacy Study Evaluating CTX001 in Subjects With Transfusion-Dependent β-Thalassemia
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05487794 -
Effect of Dose Fractionation of Testosterone Cypionate on Transgender Men With Erythrocytosis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03611257 -
Effect of dRAST on Treatment for Bacteremia in Patients With Hematologic Diseases
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02827149 -
High Resolution Donor Recipient HLA Matching Level in Unrelated HSCT
|