Clinical Trials Logo

Heel Spur clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Heel Spur.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06356064 Completed - Spur, Heel Clinical Trials

Radial or Focus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Epin Calcanei

Start date: May 15, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of radial and focused ESWT treatment on pain, function, and size of the calcaneal spur in patients with a clinical and radiological diagnosis of epin calcanei. Methods: A total of 112 patients aged between 18 and 95 years were randomly divided into two groups: group 1 received rESWT (2.4 bar 12 hz 2000 beats), and group 2 received fESWT (0.14 bar 14 hz 1000 beats) three times a week for three weeks. All patients were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)-pain and Foot Function Index (FFI) before and after the treatment, at 4 weeks and 12 weeks. Epin size was measured radiographically in the patients before and after the treatment at the 12-week follow-up.

NCT ID: NCT06240507 Completed - Plantar Fascitis Clinical Trials

Posterior Tibial Nerve PRF vs Intralesional RFT for Painful Calcaneal Spur and Plantar Fasciitis

Start date: January 2, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study aims to compare the efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided posterior tibial nerve pulsed radiofrequency (PTN PRF) and fluoroscopy (FL)-guided intralesional radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) for the treatment of painful calcaneal spur and plantar fasciitis refractory to conservative treatments. For this evaluation, a numerical rating (NRS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle hindfoot scores will be used before and after both interventions.

NCT ID: NCT06067659 Completed - Heel Spur Clinical Trials

Comparison Of The Treatment Effects Of Different Methods In Patients With Calcaneal Spur

Start date: June 20, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Calcaneal spur (heel spur) is one of the most common disorders associated with foot pain. Patients may complain of pain at every step during the day, so it is important to find the most effective treatment method for patients. The aim of this study is to compare the therapeutic efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and kinesiology taping (KB) in patients with calcaneal spurs. Thirty patients with calcaneal spurs will be included in the study. The gender, age, body weight, height, body mass index, and affected side of the patients will be recorded. Patients will be randomly divided into three treatment groups: ESWT to the first group, KB therapy to the second group, and combined ESWT+KB to the third group. Each group will be treated for five sessions, once a week for five weeks. ESWT 15Hz frequency will be applied as 2.5 Barr energy and 2000 Shock/session. It will be applied with the KB I and fan method and the tape will not be removed for three days after the application. In the pre- and post-treatment evaluations of the patients, heel sensitivity and sensory perception will be evaluated with the Foot structure Foot Posture Index (API). Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quality of Life Short Form-36 (SF-36), Foot Function Index (AFI) and Windlass Test will be used.

NCT ID: NCT04836845 Completed - Calcaneal Spur Clinical Trials

Comparation of Radial and Focused Extracorporeal Shock Waves in Calcaneal Spur: A Randomised Sham-controlled Trial

Start date: August 7, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To date, focused and radial types of ESWT have been effectively used in calcaneal spur. However, studies directly addressing a comparison between radial and focused types of ESWT in calcaneal spur have not been done. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate comparative effects of radial and focused ESWT options on calcaneal spur.

NCT ID: NCT03907085 Completed - Calcaneal Spur Clinical Trials

The Effect of High Intensity Laser Therapy in the Management of Painful Calcaneal Spur

Start date: September 1, 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The effect of high intensity laser therapy in the management of painful calcaneal spur: a double blind, placebo-controlled study

NCT ID: NCT03040557 Completed - Heel Spur Clinical Trials

Flexible Footwear and Insole in Heel Pain

Start date: January 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The plantar fasciitis (PF), most frequent injury of the musculoskeletal system, is the main cause of heel pain and functional disability. The mechanical stress, stretching of plantar fascia consequently the overload on the feet, is a major intrinsic causes the onset of FP, especially when exposed to repetitive activities, such as walking. Another extrinsic etiologic factor of great influence is inadequate shoes that can lead to a deterioration and progression of the disease. One of the great difficulties of their conservative treatment is long rehabilitation period, lasting on average 10 to 18 months. Among them, the insoles stand out as one of the effective mechanical treatments to improve the immediate pain symptoms, in the short term. Other literary evidence, not specific to FP, has shown the benefits, the short and long term, a flexible footwear promotes more flexible feet and overload reduction. Objective: Verify therapeutic effect in the long term, a flexible footwear and low cost and orthopedic insole on the clinical aspect, functional and biomechanics of the gait of women with acute FP and chronic with presence of heel spur. It will be conducted a randomized controlled trial with blinded evaluator, in which 79 women with plantar fasciitis will be randomized and allocated to the intervention group with minimalist flexible footwear (MFG, acute n=12 and chronic=15) or the intervention group with orthopedic insole (COIG, acute n=14 and chronic n=14) or control group (CG, n=24). The intervention will have duration six months, six hours a day, seven days a week (42 hours/week). For all groups will be allowed to use pain medication support (paracetamol 500 mg) with a maximum dose of two grams daily. The primary outcome will be the symptom of pain verified by visual analogue scale (VAS), the inability to areas of the feet by the total score of the FFI (Foot Function Index), health feet by FHSQ-Br questionnaire (Foot Health Questionnaire Status) and the distance traveled by the six-minute walk test (6MWT). The secondary: plantar pressure and ground reaction force during gait, paracetamol consumption and the joint angles of the lower limbs. The effects of time (Start, 3 and 6 months), group (GIC and GIP CG) and interaction (time and group) are calculated by means of ANOVA case-wise two factors. A 5% alpha to significant differences and Cohen coefficient for describing the size effect of the intervention is assumed.

NCT ID: NCT01510249 Completed - Heel Spur Clinical Trials

A Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacies of Ultrasound and Shock Wave Therapy in the Patients With Calcaneal Spur

Start date: January 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Heel spur is a troublesome disorder. Its formation is accompanied by pain in the area of heel and it makes walking limited or even impossible. The aim of the study is to analyze analgesic efficacy of ultrasound and shock wave therapy in patients with heel spur. The study included 52 patients of both sexes, aged 38-86 (average 57.39) with plantar heel spur confirmed radiographically. The patients were randomly divided into two groups;in Group 1 the patients underwent ultrasound procedure (10 treatments)and in Group 2 - radial shock wave procedure(6 treatments). The researchers assessed pain three times (prior to the therapy, after the first and then the second week of treatment). In order to do this they used a modified form of the Laitinen pain indicators questionnaire (results expressed in points) and VAS - visual analogue scale (results given in milimeters). The results were statistically analyzed. In the studied periods of time a decrease in pain was observed (both in the Laitinen questionnaire and in the VAS scale). The most rapid change was noted in both the groups after the first week of treatment. Ultrasound and shock wave therapies show a comparably significant analgesic efficacy in patients with heel spur. Shock wave therapy has an advantage over ultrasound therapy. A smaller number of procedures is required to obtain comparable results, which makes the therapy less expensive. No side effects were observed during and after the treatment.

NCT ID: NCT01439932 Completed - Fasciitis, Plantar Clinical Trials

Effectiveness of Manual Therapy Combined With Standard Treatment in the Management of Plantar Fasciitis

Start date: October 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Background: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a common problem that tends to attack about 10% of the population during life. This is a degenerative condition of the plantar fascia at its insertion at the bottom of the heel. Pain appears mainly on the first steps in the morning or after prolonged lack of weight bearing. The pain intensity can be very high and this can cause functional limitations and reduce quality of life. Despite the high prevalence of the PF, treatment is controversial and not supported by extensive research. Review of the previous studies on various treatments, mentioned steroid injections, shock waves, night splint, orthotics, heel padding and stretching exercises. Limitation of ankle dorsi flexion is a common finding and thought to be a contributing factor to the development of pathology. So far, this issue had been addressed mainly by soft tissue therapy techniques to improve ankle range of motion in patients with PF. Only one study (Joshua et al 2009) evaluated the effect of ankle joint mobilizations of PF. However, in this study mobilizations were part of complex therapy and therefore the effect of treatment cannot be attributed solely to them. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ankle and mid-foot joints mobilization on pain and function of patients with PF. The hypothesis is that manual mobilizations of ankle and midfoot joints in addition to conventional physical therapy will improve pain and function significantly more than conventional treatment, in patients with PF. Methods: 50 patients, age 18-75 with a diagnosis of PF that meet the inclusion criteria will be recruited and randomly divided into two groups. Both groups will receive commonly accepted physical therapy treatment that includes stretching exercise of the plantar fascia and triceps surae muscles and ultrasound therapy at the site of symptoms. The study group will receive in addition manual mobilizations to the ankle and midfoot joints. The procedures will take place at the physiotherapy clinic Bat-Yamon of General Health Services and will last four weeks, twice a week.