A Comparison of a New Acoustic Feedback Canceller in Hearing Aids With

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The Purpose of the study is to show that the performance of the new feedback cancellation system is better than the feedback system used in the currently marketed hearing aids. Speech understanding should not be negatively affected by the new system, ad there should be no consequential artifacts or unwanted noises caused by the new system.

Clinical Trial Description

The amplification of sounds with a hearing aid is the most common treatment for hearing loss. Benefits of amplification and accessories used with it outweigh any risks in mild to profound hearing-impaired subjects. Hearing aids provide a benefit for people with only a mild sensorineural hearing loss. However, often people are counselled to wait to purchase hearing aids until their hearing loss becomes more significant. The benefits are obtainable for both unilateral and bilateral fittings and are both short term and durable on long term. Acoustic feedback is a critical problem to all hearing aids. The acoustic coupling between the hearing aid receiver and the microphone occurs when an endless loop is formed so that the microphone is re-amplifying sound from its own receiver. The higher the amplification of the system, the more unstable it becomes and the more likely an acoustic feedback will occur. When this happens the hearing aid user and those around them hear a loud whistling noise. A common method used to combat this problem is feedback cancellation, more specifically adaptive feedback cancellation. The goal of feedback cancellation is to quickly identify feedback path changes and make adjustments to preserve the stability of the system while maintaining a high sound quality and still providing a high stable gain compared to the gain achieved without an active feedback reduction. For this study, the Sponsor will carry out testing with participants who have hearing loss to validate the performance of the new feedback cancelling algorithm. Studies have investigated the advantages and disadvantages of different feedback cancellation techniques. However, it is accepted by professionals that having a feedback system is better than not using feedback cancellation. The Sponsor has used an adaptive feedback cancellation algorithm since 2010. For the current study the new adaptive algorithm will be compared to the current algorithm implemented in the hearing aids that are certified by the European Conformity and sold on the market. The aim is to determine if less feedback is experienced using the new system in comparison to the old system. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Hearing Loss

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04146272
Study type	Interventional
Source	Bernafon AG
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	N/A
Start date	November 1, 2018
Completion date	July 7, 2019

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT04696835` - fNIRS in Pediatric Hearing Aids	N/A
Completed	`NCT03662256` - Reducing Childhood Hearing Loss in Rural Alaska Through a Preschool Screening and Referral Process Using Mobile Health and Telemedicine	N/A
Completed	`NCT04602780` - Evaluating the Revised WORQ in CI Users
Completed	`NCT03723161` - Evaluation of the Ponto Bone Anchored Hearing System in a Pediatric Atresia Population
Completed	`NCT05086809` - Investigation of an Updated Bone-anchored Sound Processor	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT03548779` - North Carolina Genomic Evaluation by Next-generation Exome Sequencing, 2	N/A
Completed	`NCT03428841` - Audiovisual Assessment After Dural Puncture During Epidural Placement in Obstetric Patients	N/A
Completed	`NCT04559282` - Home Test of New Sound Processor	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT03345654` - Individually-guided Hearing Aid Fitting
Completed	`NCT06016335` - MRI-based Synthetic CT Images of the Head and Neck	N/A
Completed	`NCT05165121` - Comparison of Hearing Aid Fitting Outcomes Between Self-fit and Professional Fit for MDHearing Smart Hearing Aids	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05533840` - Establishment and Application of a New Imaging System for Otology Based on Ultra-high Resolution CT
Terminated	`NCT02294812` - Effects of Cognitive Training on Speech Perception	N/A
Completed	`NCT04622059` - AUditive Direct In-utero Observation (AUDIO): Prenatal Testing of Congenital Hypoacusis	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT02558478` - Identification of New Genes Implicated in Rare Neurosensory Diseases by Whole Exome Sequencing	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT02740322` - Validating the Hum Test	N/A
Completed	`NCT01963104` - Community-Based Kiosks for Hearing Screening and Education	N/A
Completed	`NCT01857661` - The Influence of the Sound Generator Combined With Conventional Amplification for Tinnitus Control: Blind Randomized Clinical Trial	N/A
Completed	`NCT01892007` - Evaluation of Cogmed Working Memory Training for Adult Hearing Aid Users	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT01223638` - The Prevalence of Hearing Loss Among Children With Congenital Hypothyroidism	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

A Comparison of a New Acoustic Feedback Canceller in Hearing Aids With the Current System

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms