View clinical trials related to Hearing Loss.
Filter by:This clinical study will test a newly developed cochlear implant known as CI622D. This experimental cochlear implant has been designed to slowly release a drug called dexamethasone. Dexamethasone works to ease inflammation, which is common after any surgical procedure. The goal is to learn if there are added benefits in implant performance and hearing outcomes with the dexamethasone-releasing cochlear implant (CI622D) vs. the standard cochlear implant (CI622) without dexamethasone. The study will be conducted in adults with sensorineural hearing loss, a type of hearing loss caused by damage to the inner ear or auditory nerve. The study participants will undergo a series of tests that include testing their implant and their hearing. They will also complete questionnaires to see how they rate their hearing ability and their overall general health.
This retrospective study is conducted to gain more knowledge on use and complications of 3mm long implants used in percutaneous (through the skin) bone-anchored hearing system (BAHS) surgeries in adults. Patients included have already been treated and recieved an implant with the wide diameter (Ø: 4.5 mm) design, either of 3- or 4mm length. The main purpose of the study is to investigate implant survival three months after implantation.
The goal of this interventional study is to describe how people with cochlear implants perceive the perceive speech in noise and their sound environment on adults who are native French speakers with typical hearing or with cochlear implant(s). The measures and strategies developed in this project could benefit all current and future cochlear implant wearers by improving their perception of the sound environment and their quality of life on a daily basis. Researchers will compare normal hearing participant and participants with cochlear implant to describe the speech in noise and their perception of the sound environment. Participants will perform audiological tests to assess their perception of the sound environment, with and without speech enhancement.
The goal of this clinical trial is to optimize hearing aid benefit based on the individual auditory-cognitive need using different hearing aid features in first-time hearing aid users between 45-80 years old with bilateral Phonak Audéo Paradise/Lumity 70 hearing aids. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does cognitive functioning affect hearing aid benefit? How can hearing aid fitting be optimized based on the individual auditory-cognitive profile? The hypothesis posits that cognitive abilities influence the effectiveness of hearing aids, alongside hearing status. Furthermore, if features of hearing aids improve speech understanding and listening effort, it is proposed that individuals with lower cognitive functioning will experience heightened benefits from hearing aids. The study will consist of three groups: one control group and two groups where one different feature will be modified. Participants will be tested at baseline measurement, including: - screening tests - audiological tests - questionnaires - cognitive tests - real-ear-measurement Following this, participants will be divided in one of the three groups, after which speech audiometry will be repeated. After a 4-week acclimatization period, the second measurement will take place, repeating speech audiometry and questionnaires. Subsequently, the hearing aid settings will be restored to their initial configuration.
The need for future hearing rehabilitation is enormous. World Health Organization (WHO 2021) has estimated that by 2050, 2.5 billion people will have some degree of hearing loss, and 1/4 of them will require hearing rehabilitation. Currently, healthcare systems and processes are already overwhelmed and not adequately equipped to screen and diagnose this rapidly growing population suffering from hearing impairment. This study aims to investigate if the diagnostics of age-related hearing loss can be accelerated by involving patients in the hearing assessment process.
This is a single-group clinical trial to evaluate the performance of the EarGenie minimum viable product (MVP) in normal hearing infants. The EarGenie MVP tests for detection and discrimination of sounds will be administered, and the sensitivity and specificity of the tests will be estimated for a range of sound levels (detection) and speech sound contrasts (discrimination).
Hearing loss is one of the most prevalent impairments in the world. The World Health Organization estimates that as of 2020, around 466 million people worldwide are affected by disabling hearing loss, of which 34 million are children. Without appropriate diagnosis and treatment, hearing impairment can cause difficulties with communication, learning, social-emotional functioning, employment and quality of life. Early intervention is especially important for children, for whom unaddressed hearing loss has been proven to affect speech and language development, educational attainments, and social skills. Through early detection and interventions many of these impacts can be mitigated, highlighting the importance of accurate hearing diagnostics. Evaluation of speech intelligibility is a fundamental component of hearing assessment and rehabilitation. The current gold standard in measuring speech intelligibility relies heavily on behavioural tests. While these tests are reliable and fast in healthy adults, it is challenging to assess speech intelligibility for patients who cannot communicate clearly, such as young children. For example, behavioral tests require active participation from the patient, such as raising their hand when a sound is heard, or repeating words and sentences. Objective measures, for instance using electro-encephalography (EEG), could overcome the current challenges in hearing assessment and do not require active participation from the patient. For example, in Flanders, all newborns are screened with an objective test where a few sensors on the head detect brainwaves in response to sounds. However, objective tests only use simple sound stimuli, such as tones or clicks, which cannot be used to measure important high-level hearing outcomes, such as speech understanding. In other words, current objective tests are used to check if a person can hear a word, but they can't indicate if the person can understand the word. An obvious missing link in audiological practice is a diagnostic test that can measure high-level hearing outcomes such as speech understanding in an objective way. For this reason, CORGEE was developed. CORGEE uses a novel method of "neural speech tracking" to objectively measure speech intelligibility using EEG. In the current study, the efficacy and the clinical validity of the CORGEE software will be evaluated in young children with a hearing impairment.
The hypothesis of this research is that the AS Target setting provides the best estimate of the settings required to optimize listening in noise. As such, it is expected that speech in noise performance will be best in the AS Target condition, followed by the AS Clinic condition, and the Omni condition will be the least favourable for speech in noise performance
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening test for detecting cognitive impairment that assesses several cognitive domains (attention and concentration, arithmetic and orientation, memory, etc.). The instructions as well as some test items of the MoCA are presented auditory (spoken). Consequently, performance on the MoCA may be co-dependent on hearing. Therefore, to rule out the possible negative influence of hearing loss on performance on the MoCA, a MoCA for individuals with hearing loss was recently developed. More specifically, the original MoCA was modified by providing the instructions audiovisually (spoken with visual support) as well as by replacing hearing-dependent items. Since replacing items may affect sensitivity and specificity, the MoCA for persons with hearing loss should be revalidated.
The overarching hypothesis to be evaluated using this protocol is that age-related hearing loss (ARHL) leads to shifts in the functional spatial boundaries between segregated and integrated auditory streams, and that hearing aid intervention that relies on directional processing schemes is most effective for those that have the poorest spatial sensitivity. One key component of the research design is to measure both behavioral and neurophysiological indices of an individual's spatial segregation boundary. The second key component is to measure the cost or benefit associated with hearing aid intervention in older hearing-impaired listeners. The final component is to relate cost and benefit of hearing aid intervention to spatial sensitivity measures that might predict the efficacy of clinical intervention.