Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03859648
Other study ID # MED-EL BB
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 26, 2019
Est. completion date November 4, 2022

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source Med-El Corporation
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Approximately thirty subjects with mixed or conductive hearing loss, meeting FDA-cleared candidacy criteria for the BONEBRIDGE, will be implanted and followed for three (3) months post-activation to assess safety and effectiveness of the BONEBRIDGE implant.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 9
Est. completion date November 4, 2022
Est. primary completion date November 4, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Adults, 18 years of age or older at the time of implantation - Conductive or mixed hearing loss, defined as: - Conductive hearing loss with pure-tone average (PTA) for bone conduction thresholds better than or equal to 25 dB at 500, 1000, 2000 and 3000 Hz - Mixed hearing loss with PTA for bone conduction thresholds better than or equal to 45dB at 500, 1000, 2000, and 3000 Hz - Air-bone gap greater than or equal to 30 dB at 500, 1000, 2000, and 3000 Hz - Ability to benefit from amplification as defined by a monosyllabic (CNC) word score of 30% correct or better - Bilateral BONEBRIDGE can be considered if the difference in PTA for bone conduction thresholds is 10 dB or less between the right and left ears - Prior experience with acoustic or bone conduction hearing aids, unless candidate is unable to wear amplification for medical reasons - Able to complete testing materials in English - CT scan indicating the patient's anatomy is adequate to enable placement of the implant - Ability to undergo general anesthesia - Appropriate motivation and expectation levels - Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures for the duration of the study Exclusion Criteria: - Evidence that hearing loss is retrocochlear in origin - Skin or scalp condition precluding use of external audio processor - Suspected cognitive impairment or organic brain dysfunction

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
BONEBRIDGE
Bone Conduction Implant

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada London Health Sciences Centre London Ontario
United States The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center University Columbus Ohio
United States The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Med-El Corporation

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada, 

References & Publications (6)

Badran K, Bunstone D, Arya AK, Suryanarayanan R, Mackinnon N. Patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a 14-year experience. Otol Neurotol. 2006 Aug;27(5):659-66. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000226300.13457.a6. — View Citation

Riss D, Arnoldner C, Baumgartner WD, Blineder M, Flak S, Bachner A, Gstoettner W, Hamzavi JS. Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant. Laryngoscope. 2014 Dec;124(12):2802-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.24832. Epub 2014 Aug 20. — View Citation

Schmerber S, Deguine O, Marx M, Van de Heyning P, Sterkers O, Mosnier I, Garin P, Godey B, Vincent C, Venail F, Mondain M, Deveze A, Lavieille JP, Karkas A. Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Apr;274(4):1835-1851. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4228-6. Epub 2016 Jul 30. — View Citation

Sprinzl G, Lenarz T, Ernst A, Hagen R, Wolf-Magele A, Mojallal H, Todt I, Mlynski R, Wolframm MD. First European multicenter results with a new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant system: short-term safety and efficacy. Otol Neurotol. 2013 Aug;34(6):1076-83. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31828bb541. — View Citation

Sprinzl GM, Wolf-Magele A. The Bonebridge Bone Conduction Hearing Implant: indication criteria, surgery and a systematic review of the literature. Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Apr;41(2):131-43. doi: 10.1111/coa.12484. Epub 2016 Feb 4. — View Citation

Zernotti ME, Sarasty AB. Active Bone Conduction Prosthesis: Bonebridge(TM). Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Oct;19(4):343-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1564329. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number and Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Device Related Adverse Events Adverse events will be collected and reported throughout the duration of the study. Up to three (3 months) post activation
Primary Percentage Change in AZ Bio Sentence Score in Noise Percent improvement in AZ Bio sentence in noise scores will be compared from baseline to 3 months post activation. Baseline and 3 months post activation
Secondary Percentage Change in CNC Word Score Percent improvement in CNC word scores will be compared from baseline to 3 months post activation. Baseline and 3 months post activation
Secondary Number of Subjects With Stable or Better Soundfield Thresholds The number of subjects with stable or better aided soundfield thresholds at 3 months post activation compared to baseline unaided soundfield thresholds Baseline and 3 months post activation
Secondary Number of Subjects With Better QuickSIN Signal-to-noise-ratio Performance The number of subjects with similar or better performance on the QuickSIN (Speech In Noise) task in the implanted ear compared to baseline performance Baseline and 3 months post activation
Secondary Number of Subjects With Stable Unaided Bone Conduction Thresholds The number of subjects with stable bone conduction thresholds at the device activation interval compared to pre-operative bone conduction thresholds. Baseline and 2 weeks post surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05086809 - Investigation of an Updated Bone-anchored Sound Processor N/A
Recruiting NCT05615649 - Expanded Indications in the Pediatric BONEBRIDGE Population N/A
Completed NCT04147611 - Remote Microphone (RM) - A Comparative Study N/A
Recruiting NCT06058767 - Preschool Hearing Screening N/A
Completed NCT03333577 - Evaluation of the Baha SoundArc in Pediatric Patients N/A
Completed NCT03766152 - Audiological Benefit and Improved Quality of Life With Two Bone Conduction Systems: ADHEAR vs. Bonebridge in Experienced Users N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03742089 - Evaluation of the BHX Implant in Children With a BAHS
Not yet recruiting NCT06338670 - Clinical Performance of the Osia 3 Sound Processor Compared With the Osia 2 Sound Processor in Adult Osia Implant Users N/A
Completed NCT01822119 - Clinical Performance of a Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Solution (Baha® Attract System) N/A
Recruiting NCT04803279 - Investigating Hearing With Ponto 3 SuperPower, a Bone Anchored Hearing Aid - Investigating Hear
Not yet recruiting NCT04427631 - Exploring Interventions for Glue Ear During Covid-19 N/A
Completed NCT02022085 - Post-market Clinical Follow-up of a Magnetic Bone Conduction Implant (Cochlear Baha Attract System) N/A
Completed NCT01738490 - Long-term Stability and Survival Rates of a Novel Oticon Medical Bone Conduction Device Implant N/A
Recruiting NCT05055115 - Ph.D.-Project: Eustachian Tube Dysfunction: Causes, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis N/A
Completed NCT03129191 - Audiological Benefit With Non-implantable Bone Conduction Hearing Systems N/A
Recruiting NCT04899037 - Pilot Study to Evaluate the Long-term Chronic Care of Patients Who Could or do Utilize an Osseointegrated Device (OID)
Completed NCT01858246 - A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Bone Anchored Hearing Aid With Bonebridge N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05166265 - Clinical Investigation Study of Safety and Performance of the Sentio System. N/A
Completed NCT04761926 - Investigating Hearing With the Ponto 4, a Bone Anchored Hearing Aid N/A
Completed NCT01796236 - Clinical and Health Economic Evaluation With a New Baha® Abutment Combined With a Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique N/A