Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Speech in noise intelligibility |
LIST (Leuven intelligibility sentences test) sentences presented in speech-weighted noise. Participants are required to repeat sentences in noise. The Leuven Intelligibility Sentences Test (LIST, (van Wieringen & Wouters, 2008)) was specifically designed for speech perception in noise assessment in CI users. The test has a high test-retest reliability and a steep slope making it very sensitive to small improvements in performance. An improvement of 2dB results in a clinically relevant improvement in speech discrimination in noise. Therefore, the primary endpoint to validate the ALICE app will be an improvement of 2dB on speech discrimination in noise. |
During the first appointment before using the ALICE app |
|
Primary |
Speech in noise intelligibility |
LIST (Leuven intelligibility sentences test) sentences presented in speech-weighted noise. Participants are required to repeat sentences in noise. The Leuven Intelligibility Sentences Test (LIST, (van Wieringen & Wouters, 2008)) was specifically designed for speech perception in noise assessment in CI users. The test has a high test-retest reliability and a steep slope making it very sensitive to small improvements in performance. An improvement of 2dB results in a clinically relevant improvement in speech discrimination in noise. Therefore, the primary endpoint to validate the ALICE app will be an improvement of 2dB on speech discrimination in noise. |
After 8 weeks of training with the ALICE app during the final appointment |
|
Primary |
Speech in noise intelligibility |
BLU (Brugge-Leuven-Utrecht list) words presented in speech-weighted noise. Participants are required to repeat words in noise. The Brugge-Leuven-Utrecht list (BLU, ((Bosman, Woutes & Damman), 1994)) is a validated speech test during which Dutch words are provided in quiet or in noise. Each list contains 10 2-sylable words. |
During the first appointment before the hearing aid trial period |
|
Primary |
Speech in noise intelligibility |
BLU (Brugge-Leuven-Utrecht list) words presented in speech-weighted noise. Participants are required to repeat words in noise. The Brugge-Leuven-Utrecht list (BLU, ((Bosman, Woutes & Damman), 1994)) is a validated speech test during which Dutch words are provided in quiet or in noise. Each list contains 10 2-sylable words. |
During an appointment 2 weeks into the hearing aid trial period |
|
Primary |
Speech in noise intelligibility |
BLU (Brugge-Leuven-Utrecht list) words presented in speech-weighted noise. Participants are required to repeat words in noise. The Brugge-Leuven-Utrecht list (BLU, ((Bosman, Woutes & Damman), 1994)) is a validated speech test during which Dutch words are provided in quiet or in noise. Each list contains 10 2-sylable words. |
During the appointment at the end of the hearing aid trial period |
|
Secondary |
COSI (Client Oriented Scale of Improvement) |
The COSI questionnaire is a validated clinical tool that can assist in measuring the impact of hearing aid fitting on a person's life and the benefit that is obtained after intervention (Dillon et al., 1997). Administering the COSI questionnaire is also part of the RIZIV application to receive a refund for hearing aids. The COSI questionnaire allows the audiologist to measure improvements in listening situations important for their client. Before fitting the hearing aids, together with their client, they list their client's needs/goals. After hearing aids have been fitted and the client has had time to experience the hearing aids, they evaluate the progression/satisfaction in these situations together with their client. |
During the first appointment before using the ALICE app |
|
Secondary |
COSI (Client Oriented Scale of Improvement) |
The COSI questionnaire is a validated clinical tool that can assist in measuring the impact of hearing aid fitting on a person's life and the benefit that is obtained after intervention (Dillon et al., 1997). Administering the COSI questionnaire is also part of the RIZIV application to receive a refund for hearing aids. The COSI questionnaire allows the audiologist to measure improvements in listening situations important for their client. Before fitting the hearing aids, together with their client, they list their client's needs/goals. After hearing aids have been fitted and the client has had time to experience the hearing aids, they evaluate the progression/satisfaction in these situations together with their client. |
During the first appointment before the hearing aid trial period |
|
Secondary |
COSI (Client Oriented Scale of Improvement) |
The COSI questionnaire is a validated clinical tool that can assist in measuring the impact of hearing aid fitting on a person's life and the benefit that is obtained after intervention (Dillon et al., 1997). Administering the COSI questionnaire is also part of the RIZIV application to receive a refund for hearing aids. The COSI questionnaire allows the audiologist to measure improvements in listening situations important for their client. Before fitting the hearing aids, together with their client, they list their client's needs/goals. After hearing aids have been fitted and the client has had time to experience the hearing aids, they evaluate the progression/satisfaction in these situations together with their client. |
After 8 weeks of training with the ALICE app during the final appointment |
|
Secondary |
COSI (Client Oriented Scale of Improvement) |
The COSI questionnaire is a validated clinical tool that can assist in measuring the impact of hearing aid fitting on a person's life and the benefit that is obtained after intervention (Dillon et al., 1997). Administering the COSI questionnaire is also part of the RIZIV application to receive a refund for hearing aids. The COSI questionnaire allows the audiologist to measure improvements in listening situations important for their client. Before fitting the hearing aids, together with their client, they list their client's needs/goals. After hearing aids have been fitted and the client has had time to experience the hearing aids, they evaluate the progression/satisfaction in these situations together with their client. |
During the appointment at the end of the hearing aid trial period |
|
Secondary |
CAS (Communication and Acceptance Scale) |
The CAS is a validated scale that consist of 18 items (Öberg et al., 2021). The CAS scale is a reliable instrument that can be used to measure the effect of a rehabilitation programme. Each question is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (completely agree to completely disagree). It was developed to detect clinical changes in "communication strategies and the emotional consequences, knowledge and acceptance of hearing loss". This questionnaire has been translated from Swedish to Dutch (and back translated to ensure correct translation). |
During the first appointment before using the ALICE app |
|
Secondary |
CAS (Communication and Acceptance Scale) |
The CAS is a validated scale that consist of 18 items (Öberg et al., 2021). The CAS scale is a reliable instrument that can be used to measure the effect of a rehabilitation programme. Each question is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (completely agree to completely disagree). It was developed to detect clinical changes in "communication strategies and the emotional consequences, knowledge and acceptance of hearing loss". This questionnaire has been translated from Swedish to Dutch (and back translated to ensure correct translation). |
During the first appointment before the hearing aid trial period |
|
Secondary |
CAS (Communication and Acceptance Scale) |
The CAS is a validated scale that consist of 18 items (Öberg et al., 2021). The CAS scale is a reliable instrument that can be used to measure the effect of a rehabilitation programme. Each question is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (completely agree to completely disagree). It was developed to detect clinical changes in "communication strategies and the emotional consequences, knowledge and acceptance of hearing loss". This questionnaire has been translated from Swedish to Dutch (and back translated to ensure correct translation). |
During an appointment 2 weeks into the hearing aid trial period |
|
Secondary |
CAS (Communication and Acceptance Scale) |
The CAS is a validated scale that consist of 18 items (Öberg et al., 2021). The CAS scale is a reliable instrument that can be used to measure the effect of a rehabilitation programme. Each question is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (completely agree to completely disagree). It was developed to detect clinical changes in "communication strategies and the emotional consequences, knowledge and acceptance of hearing loss". This questionnaire has been translated from Swedish to Dutch (and back translated to ensure correct translation). |
After 8 weeks of training with the ALICE app during the final appointment |
|
Secondary |
CAS (Communication and Acceptance Scale) |
The CAS is a validated scale that consist of 18 items (Öberg et al., 2021). The CAS scale is a reliable instrument that can be used to measure the effect of a rehabilitation programme. Each question is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (completely agree to completely disagree). It was developed to detect clinical changes in "communication strategies and the emotional consequences, knowledge and acceptance of hearing loss". This questionnaire has been translated from Swedish to Dutch (and back translated to ensure correct translation). |
During the appointment at the end of the hearing aid trial period |
|
Secondary |
EAS (Effort Assessment Scale) |
EAS is a validated scale to measure listening effort (Alhanbali et al., 2017). The EAS consists of 6 items that are scored by the client on a 10-point scale, no effort to lots of effort. The EAS questions were translated to Dutch for this study. |
During the first appointment before using the ALICE app |
|
Secondary |
EAS (Effort Assessment Scale) |
EAS is a validated scale to measure listening effort (Alhanbali et al., 2017). The EAS consists of 6 items that are scored by the client on a 10-point scale, no effort to lots of effort. The EAS questions were translated to Dutch for this study. |
After 8 weeks of training with the ALICE app during the final appointment |
|
Secondary |
SSQ12 (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale) |
The SSQ12 is a short version of the validated Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale. This short form was developed for use in clinical research and rehabilitation settings. (Noble et al., 2013). Participants score each questions on a ruler (visual analogue scale) from 0 to 10. Questions were translated to Dutch. |
During the first appointment before using the ALICE app |
|
Secondary |
SSQ12 (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale) |
The SSQ12 is a short version of the validated Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale. This short form was developed for use in clinical research and rehabilitation settings. (Noble et al., 2013). Participants score each questions on a ruler (visual analogue scale) from 0 to 10. Questions were translated to Dutch. |
During the first appointment before the hearing aid trial period |
|
Secondary |
SSQ12 (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale) |
The SSQ12 is a short version of the validated Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale. This short form was developed for use in clinical research and rehabilitation settings. (Noble et al., 2013). Participants score each questions on a ruler (visual analogue scale) from 0 to 10. Questions were translated to Dutch. |
After 8 weeks of training with the ALICE app during the final appointment |
|
Secondary |
SSQ12 (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale) |
The SSQ12 is a short version of the validated Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale. This short form was developed for use in clinical research and rehabilitation settings. (Noble et al., 2013). Participants score each questions on a ruler (visual analogue scale) from 0 to 10. Questions were translated to Dutch. |
During the appointment at the end of the hearing aid trial period |
|
Secondary |
IOI-HA (International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids) |
The IOI-HA (International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids) evaluates the daily use of the hearing aid, as well as the perceived benefit and satisfaction with the hearing aids or cochlear implants. The IOI-HA consist of 7 questions and has been validated in Dutch (Kramer et al., 2002). |
During the first appointment before using the ALICE app |
|
Secondary |
IOI-HA (International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids) |
The IOI-HA (International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids) evaluates the daily use of the hearing aid, as well as the perceived benefit and satisfaction with the hearing aids or cochlear implants. The IOI-HA consist of 7 questions and has been validated in Dutch (Kramer et al., 2002). |
During the first appointment before the hearing aid trial period |
|
Secondary |
IOI-HA (International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids) |
The IOI-HA (International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids) evaluates the daily use of the hearing aid, as well as the perceived benefit and satisfaction with the hearing aids or cochlear implants. The IOI-HA consist of 7 questions and has been validated in Dutch (Kramer et al., 2002). |
After 8 weeks of training with the ALICE app during the final appointment |
|
Secondary |
IOI-HA (International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids) |
The IOI-HA (International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids) evaluates the daily use of the hearing aid, as well as the perceived benefit and satisfaction with the hearing aids or cochlear implants. The IOI-HA consist of 7 questions and has been validated in Dutch (Kramer et al., 2002). |
During the appointment at the end of the hearing aid trial period |
|
Secondary |
The ALICE-specific Questionnaire |
A specific ALICE-questionnaire was developed for the purpose of this study. The questions of this questionnaire were based on 3 different questionnaires. First, the SUS (system usability scale) to determine the usability of the ALICE app. Second, the SADL (Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Living) which was designed to evaluate the satisfaction that people experience with their hearing aids. Third, the PREM (Patient Reported Experience Measures) as is used to evaluate audiological centres in the Netherlands. A total of 20 questions were selected to evaluate the participants' experience with the usability of the ALICE app, their satisfaction with their hearing aids and their satisfaction with their audiologist/hearing centre. |
During an appointment 2 weeks into the hearing aid trial period |
|
Secondary |
The ALICE-specific Questionnaire |
A specific ALICE-questionnaire was developed for the purpose of this study. The questions of this questionnaire were based on 3 different questionnaires. First, the SUS (system usability scale) to determine the usability of the ALICE app. Second, the SADL (Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Living) which was designed to evaluate the satisfaction that people experience with their hearing aids. Third, the PREM (Patient Reported Experience Measures) as is used to evaluate audiological centres in the Netherlands. A total of 20 questions were selected to evaluate the participants' experience with the usability of the ALICE app, their satisfaction with their hearing aids and their satisfaction with their audiologist/hearing centre. |
During the appointment at the end of the hearing aid trial period |
|