View clinical trials related to Healthy Volunteers.
Filter by:The goal of this bioequivalence study is to determine and compare the rate and extent of absorption and to evaluate safety of test and reference formulations. Study Design: An open label, randomized, two-treatment, four-period, two-sequence replicate crossover bioequivalence study in 46 healthy Thai volunteers under fasting conditions with at least 7 days washout period.
This trial aims to evaluate the added improvements from a caregiver and patient benefit perspective. The trial should identify the forces involved for the caregiver when manoeuvring the lift.
The purpose of this study is to compare if three forms of study medicine (called ritlecitinib) get processed differently in healthy adults. This study is seeking healthy participants who have: - Aged 18 years or older; - male or female who are healthy as determined by medical assessment; - BMI of 16-32 kg/m2, and a total body weight >45 kg (99 lb). All participants in this study will receive a ritlecitinib oral dose in three different forms (solution, capsule 1 and capsule 2). The study will take up to 2.5 months, including the screening period and follow-up phone call. Participants will have to stay at the study clinic for at least 13 days. There will be 4 periods in total for this study. On day 1 of each period, participants will take one form of Riltecitinib without food for the first three periods and with food for the last period. Participants will have blood samples taken both before and after taking ritlecitinib. A follow-up phone call will be made at 28 to 35 days after the last study period.
This is an observational study to address the important knowledge gap of the metabolic and inflammatory impact of acute overeating and whether timing of acute overeating may modify these effects. The hypothesis is that acute overconsumption of calories will promote inflammation and metabolic dysfunction, with the most detrimental effects observed with evening caloric overconsumption. The expectation is that this study to provide critical insights into the biological consequences of overeating, which will direct novel approaches combating overeating and its detrimental health effects.
The goal of this crossover study is to compare urine drug concentrations using a continuous vibrating mesh nebulizer versus a breath-actuated vibrating mesh nebulizer in healthy volunteers. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Whether breath-actuation nebulizer delivers higher inhaled drug dose, resulting in higher urine drug concentrations compared to continuous nebulization. - Whether the different nebulizer modes deliver inhaled drug resulting in different effects on physiological parameters, including heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and blood oxygen saturation. Participants will - Inhale one dose (2.5mg) of salbutamol via continuous vs. breath-actuated nebulize mode. - collect urine samples at multiple timepoints before and after nebulization to quantify drug elimination. Researchers will compare the continuous and breath-actuated modes of vibrating mesh nebulizers to determine if breath-actuation improves drug delivery efficiency compared to continuous nebulization.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and immunogenicity after single ascending doses (SAD) of ABBV-141 in healthy adult Western and Asian participants.
Verasone™ is an aqueous suspension of the combination of two marketed drugs to be dosed by sinonasal irrigation in the treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS). This Phase 1 first-in-human study will assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of single and multiple ascending doses of Verasone versus placebo in healthy normal participants and will evaluate the PK profiles of the Verasone active components administered individually vs in combination.
This is a single center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single ascending subcutaneous dose study in lean to overweight or obese but otherwise healthy men. It is planned to enroll 4 cohorts of 8 subjects (Regimens A, B, C and D), with 2 additional optional cohorts of 8 subjects (Regimens E and F). Within each cohort, subjects will be randomized in a ratio of 6 active to 2 placebo. The primary objective is to assess the safety. Secondary objectives are to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and to investigate pharmacodynamic effects.
Although the cause of persistent non-specific low back pain (LBP) remains unknown, structural and functional alterations of the brain, alterations in the lumbar muscles and dysfunction of the central nervous system have been proposed as underlying mechanisms. In this case-control study, 1) brain structure/function, 2) lumbar muscle function and 3) central pain processing are compared across four groups: 1) healthy participants, 2) recurrent LBP (both during pain flare and during pain remission), 3) chronic LBP and 4) fibromyalgia. According to previous research, healthy participants and fibromyalgia patients are two extremes of a "musculoskeletal pain continuum". Healthy participants representing one extreme of the continuum with no pain and fibromyalgia representing the other extreme of the continuum with chronic widespread pain. It is thought that different LBP populations (i.e. (sub)acute, recurrent, chronic LBP) float between the aforementioned extremes. Past studies already highlighted the need for studies comparing the pathophysiological mechanisms for different pain syndromes to identify common underlying mechanisms across pain syndromes. For this reason, the goal of the current study is to compare alterations in brain structure/function, alterations in lumbar muscle function and alterations in central pain processing across the aforementioned "musculoskeletal pain continuum". It is hypothesized that longer duration of pain (recurrent vs chronic) and the extensiveness of the pain (one location vs widespread pain) are associated with more pronounced alterations in 1) brain structure/function, 2) lumbar muscle function and 3) central pain processing.
This study is a single-dose, open-label, randomized crossover and multiple-dose, open-label study to evaluate the PK of azelaprag in older adult healthy volunteers.