View clinical trials related to Healthy Adult Volunteers.
Filter by:This Clinical Trial is an open, randomized, fasted, single-dose, oral administration 2-sequence, 2-period crossover study to assess bioequivalence of lazertinib between two formulations in healthy adult volunteers. The subjects administer 240mg of lazertinib of different formulations on the fasted status on each period and have a wash-out period for 14-21 days between the first and second period.
The ketone body (KB) ß-hydroxybutyrate will be given to eight fasting healthy volunteers of both sexes in order to observe the effects after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) over 2 h. Then, a standard lunch will be served at 12.00, as well as an afternoon snack at 15.00. Each participant will be its own control and participates in a randomised two-way cross over design; the KB are released in the stomach-duodenum, or in the ileum-colon. Peripheral blood samples are taken for endpoint GLP-1 analyses.
The investigators conduct a prospective analysis to compare homologous and heterologous adenovirus vector ChAdOx1-nCov-19 (Astra-Zeneca) or SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine inoculation. Healthy volunteers will be enrolled and divided into five groups. The first group is the subjects who received ChAdOx1- nCov-19 vaccine with 8 weeks apart; the second group is the SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA-1273 vaccine after the first dose of ChAdOx1-nCov-19 vaccination with 8 weeks apart; the third group is the first dose of ChAdOx1-nCov-19 vaccine and the SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA-1273 vaccine with 4 weeks apart; the fourth group is the SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA-1273 vaccination with 4 weeks apart; the fifth group is the first dose of ChAdOx1-nCov-19 vaccine and the SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA-1273 vaccine with 12 weeks apart. There will be 100 volunteers in each group. Antibody test on the day before and the 14th, 28th day and 12th week after the second dose of vaccination, including 100 subjects in each group for SARS-CoV-2 ELISA antibody titer and 50 people in each group for SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titer. Adverse reactions at the first day, the 14th day, the 28th day, and the 12th week. The research team follow up each volunteer at the 6th month.
To compare and evaluate safety and pharmacokinetic Characteristics after administration of ATB-101 or co-administration of ATB-1011 and ATB-1012 in fasted Healthy Adult Volunteers
To evaluate the interaction between two investigational products by comparing and analyzing pharmacokinetic interactions and safety in steady state after multiple oral administration of ATB-1011 or ATB-1012 alone or in combination in healthy adult volunteers.
This is a pilot study designed to test feasibility, tolerability, and safety of medical grade oral Activated Charcoal (AC) in 12 healthy volunteers. To determine the two most palatable and tolerable AC combinations. There will be a total of 4 combinations (2 AC doses and 2 solutions) in stage 1. Each participant will drink an assigned combination every day for 3 consecutive days (Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, "M/T/W") and switch to a different assigned combination M/T/W the following week. AC solution assignments will be defined before the study using a balanced incomplete block design. Each subject will rate their experience using a 5-point scale every day for the 12 days they are on study.
Oxidative metabolism of APAP will be studied with and without 4-MP.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of two dose levels of OP0201 and placebo, when administered intranasally in healthy adults subjects.
The purpose of this Study is to find out whether an investigational drug is safe and well tolerated. MW189 is being studied as a possible short-term treatment for people with different types of brain injury. MW189 has previously been given to healthy human volunteers as a single dose, and there were no significant problems or bad effects in people who received the Study drug. However, before it can be tested in people with brain injury, it is important to test MW189 in healthy volunteers when given multiple doses.
The prescription of intravenous maintenance solutions - although widespread - lacks important data on the optimal sodium and potassium content, which has given rise to an important debate in the scientific literature. Our study compares two different infusion fluids in 12 healthy adult volunteers without renal failure in a single-blind randomized crossover design over two 48 hour periods during which subjects are not allowed to eat or drink. Fluid 1 is a premixed solution containing 54 mmol/L of sodium and 26 mmol/L of potassium; fluid 2 is sodium chloride 0.9% in glucose 5% with 40 mmol/L of potassium. Both solutions are administered at 25 mL/kg of ideal body weight, as recommended by current guidelines (NICE 174) and both solutions are widely used in daily clinical practice. The primary hypothesis is that isotonic maintenance solutions lead to more fluid retention than hypotonic fluids. Metabolism of both solutions is assessed by sequential analysis of urine and serum, clinical parameters and bioelectrical impedance analysis.