Evaluation of Training Programme of Service Doctors and Trainees

Health Services Clinical Trial

— FMT  

Official title:

Evaluation of the Hospital Authority Resource Allocation Exercise - Training

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04323891
• Other study ID #: HKCTR-1313
• Status: Completed
• Start date: January 2011
• Est. completion date: April 2012

Study information

• Verified date: March 2020
• Source: The University of Hong Kong
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of training of the Resources Allocation Exercise (RAE) training programme for higher trainees (HT) and service doctors (SD) in the Hospital Authority (HA) using an evidence-based structured and comprehensive evaluation framework to identify areas for quality enhancement.

Design, Setting and Subjects: A longitudinal study will be conducted using the Action Learning and Audit Spiral methodologies to measure whether the target standard of training intended by the RAE training programme is achieved. Each cluster coordinator will be invited to complete a questionnaire on structure and process of training. All eligible HT and SD will be invited to complete a questionnaire on the process of training and their training and education background. All HT and SD will also be included in the evaluation on the outcomes of training programme.

Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes are the proportion of clusters that have satisfied each of the structure criteria, HT and SD who have reported the criterion process of training, and HT and SD who have rated the training programmes to be of educational value.

Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics on standard of training will be calculated. Regressions will be used to identify factors that are associated with quality of training.

Hypothesis: The quality of training of the RAE training programme will be determined. Areas of deficiency and possible areas for quality enhancement will be identified. The results of this study will provide empirical evidence on the quality of RAE training programme for HT and SD. It also provides information on the effectiveness of RAE training programmes for improving skills and knowledge of primary care doctors.

Description:

The structure, process and outcomes of special training programmes for service doctors and family medicine trainees in public primary care clinics in Hong Kong will be evaluated by two audit cycles from 2011 to 2012.

Data Collection

All records of released training sessions of doctors or trainees of all public primary care clinics in Hong Kong, the training curriculum, the participation rates, and participant rating on effectiveness will be reviewed.

Outcome Measures

1. Participation rate

2. Annual participation frequency per doctor

3. Proportion of doctors rating the training effective

4. Success rate in end of training examination pass rate.

Expected results The information will inform whether the special training programmes for service doctors and trainees are effective in enhancing knowledge, skills and success in professional examination.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 278
• Est. completion date: April 2012
• Est. primary completion date: April 2012
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• All HA service doctors who have not had any vocational training and all HA doctors currently enrolled in Hong Kong College of Family Physicians - Family Medicine (HKCFP FM) higher training will be recruited.

Exclusion Criteria:

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Health Services

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Hong Kong	The University of Hong Kong	Hong Kong	Hksar

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
The University of Hong Kong	Hospital Authority, Hong Kong

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Hong Kong, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	The proportion of clusters that have satisfied each of the structure criteria.		March, 2011; December, 2011
Primary	The proportion of higher trainees and service doctors who have reported the criterion process of training.		March, 2011; December, 2011
Primary	The proportion of higher trainees and service doctors who have rated the training programmes to be of educational value.		March, 2011; December, 2011