Hand Hygiene Intervention Study

Health Care Workers Clinical Trial

— HAND  

Official title:

A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Impact of a Multimodal Hand Hygiene Intervention at Sappasithiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01933087
• Other study ID #: MICRO1202
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: December 24, 2013
• Est. completion date: May 2, 2015

Study information

• Verified date: October 2020
• Source: University of Oxford
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Infections acquired by patients in hospitals are a major cause of illness and death worldwide, and particularly so in hospitals with very limited resources. Simple hygiene measures, including improved hand hygiene (particularly with increased use of alcohol-based hand rub) by healthcare workers (HCWs) in physical contact with patients, are thought to be amongst the most effective ways of reducing such infections. However, in most hospitals hand hygiene is practiced poorly and improving hand hygiene behavior amongst hospital staff has been found to be difficult. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a multimodal intervention to improve hand hygiene amongst health care workers in accordance with the WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. The research design is a prospective stepped wedged trial using all in-patient wards in a 1,000 bed hospital located in Northeast Thailand (Sappasitthiprasong hospital, Ubon Ratchatani). A stepped wedge design is a type of cluster randomized controlled trial which is appropriate when there are prior reasons to believe the intervention will be beneficial (as opposed to equipoise) and when it is impractical to deliver the intervention to all study units simultaneously. Both conditions hold here. The intervention will include educational visits to healthcare workers, improved reminders in the workplace, audit and feedback and social marketing with the aim of inducing behavioural and cultural change in relation to hand hygiene. The intervention will be delivered by the infection control team and the infection control ward nurses (ICWNs) who will receive additional training. The primary outcome will be directly observed hand hygiene compliance. Secondary outcomes will include incidence density of hospital-associated bloodstream and urinary tract infections with specified multiply antibiotic resistant bacteria, incidence density of hospital-associated bloodstream and urinary tract infections with non-multiply antibiotic resistant bacteria, total patient mortality rates, and ward-based consumption of alcohol hand rub and soap (a proxy for hand hygiene compliance). Results from this study will be immediately generalisable to other resource-constrained hospitals in Thailand. The research will also have much wider international significance as there have been very few methodologically sound evaluations of the impact of hand hygiene interventions in hospitals. Moreover, the findings will provide essential information for subsequent work on economic evaluations of infection control interventions to determine under what circumstances such interventions are likely to be cost-effective.

Description:

Healthcare-associated infections(HCAIs) are a global problem and a major source of preventable morbidity and mortality worldwide, but particularly so in low and middle income countries. A recent review estimated the pooled prevalence of HCAI in developing countries (defined as Organisation Economic Co-operation Development (OECD) low or middle income countries) to be 15.5 per 100 patients, and highlighted the need to improve infection control practices. Rates of surgical site infection have been reported to range from 12 to 39% in developing countries compared to 2 to 5% in developed countries and rates of HCAI in neonates have been found to be 12 times higher in developing countries. Mortality due to such infections in developing countries is found to greatly exceed that in developed countries. There is, however, evidence from quasi experimental research that concerted and sometimes low-cost interventions are able to greatly reduce the hospital transmission and prevalence of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs), resulting in improved patient outcomes. Improved hand hygiene(HH) is widely believed to be the single most effective intervention. However a 2010 Cochrane review has highlighted the lack of methodologically sound research evaluating interventions to improve HH: only four studies met the minimum inclusion criteria and only one such study came from a lower or middle income country (a randomised trial of an educational intervention for nurses in China). Moreover, a recent review has identified a need for stronger evidence linking improved HH compliance with reductions in HCAIs (currently such evidence is based only on observational studies). While there are comprehensive hospital infection control guidelines at the proposed study site, Sappasithiprasong hospitals, a recent observational study our team carried out at this hospital has indicated poor HH compliance, below 5% for all health-care workers(HCWs) (manuscript in preparation). Previous data collected by our team has suggested hospital infection control guidelines may not have been implemented consistently due, in part, to resource constraints[5]. More recent qualitative research we have carried out at Sappasithiprasong hospital into the causes of poor hand hygiene compliance has identified several obstacles, and highlighted in particular a lack of knowledge about appropriate hand hygiene behaviour. Available evidence suggests that hand hygiene promotion (HHP) with a multimodal intervention will be the most effective approach to improve HCW hand hygiene compliance[6]. While formal evaluation of such an intervention using a strong study design in lower and middle income countries is lacking, such interventions are relatively inexpensive and thought likely to be cost-effective (and potentially cost-saving as a result of reduced infections rates). Again, however, formal economic evaluations outside high income countries are lacking. This approach promoted by the WHO guidelines identifies five moments for HH (before patient contact, before aseptic procedure, after body fluid exposure, after touching a patient, after touching a patient's surroundings). These guidelines aim to encourage good HH compliance in the real world and recommend a multimodal HHP strategy making use of up to five components: 1) system change (for example, changing systems to ensure that alcohol-based hand-rub is readily available wherever and whenever needed), 2) training and education, 3) observation and feedback, 4) reminders in the hospital, and 5) a hospital safety climate. Adapting these guidelines to local conditions is important, and will make use of our initial qualitative research. This has identified important local barriers to achieving high levels of HH compliance. Another major issue for improving HH behaviour in hospital HCWs is sustainability. While many studies have reported immediate improvements in HH following interventions, sustaining such improvements is much more challenging and another area where research has been very limited. In conclusion, there is a need for methodologically rigorous research to evaluate the impact of a multimodal intervention based on the WHO recommendations both in the short and longer-term considering as outcomes both HH compliance, and preventable HCAIs. The need for such research is greatest in resource-constrained settings in lower and middle income countries where the burden of disease due to healthcare associated infections is the greatest. Findings from this research can also inform economic evaluations which are needed to determine the conditions under which such interventions are cost-effective.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 58
• Est. completion date: May 2, 2015
• Est. primary completion date: May 2, 2015
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• All HCWs, having direct patient contact, in all in-patient wards including Intensive Care Units (ICU) and non-ICUs.

Exclusion Criteria:

• There are no exclusion criteria for the primary outcome.
• HCWs who refuse to sign the informed consent to participate self-administered questionnaire will be excluded from the secondary outcome assessing knowledge and beliefs of HCWs.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Health Care Workers

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Hand hygiene promotion
The intervention will adapt from the WHO Multimodal HH Improvement Strategy making use of five components: 1) system change (for example, changing systems to ensure that alcohol-based hand-rub is readily available wherever and whenever needed), 2) training and education, 3) observation and feedback, 4) reminders in the hospital, and 5) a hospital safety climate with the aim of inducing behavioural and cultural change in relation to reduce HCAI and improve HH. The intervention will be delivered to infection control ward nurses (ICWNs) of each ward at each time step by researcher and the infection control team (ICT).

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Oxford

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	28-day mortality following hospital admission	28 day mortality data will be collected following completion of phase 3 of the study by linking hospital records of hospital discharges with the national register of deaths.	16 months
Other	Ward-level consumption of alcohol hand-rub and soap per occupied bed day (an indirect measure o hand hygiene compliance)	Ward-level consumption data of alcohol hand-rub and soap will be collected at weekly intervals from all study wards throughout the entire study period by the infection control ward nurses. These data will be entered on standard forms which will be returned to the infection control team and entered onto the study database.	16 months
Other	Knowledge and beliefs of healthcare workers regarding hand hygiene	For the hospital wards selecting an educational programme as one of the multimodal interventions, the infection control team will administer a short questionnaire to determine staff knowledge, beliefs and attitudes one month before and one month after the intervention in each ward to all staff having direct patient contact including doctors, medical students, nurses, and workers in all participating wards.	16 months
Other	Resource used or costs related to the hand hygiene promotion.	Costs of intervention will be assessed using standard forms developed by health economists to record time spent on developing and delivering the intervention, and time spent by other staff attending training. These forms will be completed by the ICT and a sample of the ICWNs. Cost changes in terms of staff time for performing hand hygiene will be estimated from the primary outcome data, and cost changes resulting from changes in number of infections will be estimated from secondary outcome data sources.	16 months
Primary	Hand hygiene compliance amongst healthcare workers having direct patient contact.	Directly observed hand hygiene compliance data will be collected during all three phases of the study by two observers. Each observer will directly observe healthcare worker compliance with the recommended five moments of hand hygiene in study wards, and a minimum of one hour's hand hygiene observation data will be collected from each ward during each week of the study. Observations will be in accordance with WHO recommendations and make use of the WHO's "5-movements" framework and the standard WHO hand hygiene compliance observation forms.	16 months
Secondary	Incidence of healthcare-associated bloodstream and urinary tract infections	Data from hospital records and from the microbiology laboratory will be used together to identify hospital acquired bacteraemias and urinary tract infections. These two routine data sets will be extracted by the hospital staff at three-monthly intervals. Hospital-acquired infections will be defined by standard criteria; for example, isolation of multi-drug resistant organisms from blood or sterile (urine) site culture taken more than 48 hours after admission. This study will not perform additional microbiology tests, but will make use of results from tests taken as part of routine hospital work.	16 months