Clinical Trials Logo

Head Trauma clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Head Trauma.

Filter by:
  • Not yet recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06113939 Not yet recruiting - Cardiac Arrest Clinical Trials

Prevention of Infection of the Respiratory Tract Through Application of Non-Invasive Methods of Secretion Suctioning

PIRAMIDES
Start date: April 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Severe trauma, head trauma, stroke and resuscitated cardiac arrest patients requiring endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are at high risk of early-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia (EO-VAP). A short course of systemic antibiotic is recommended for prophylaxis. This study intends to assess the safety and efficacy of 2 alternative mechanical non-invasive airway clearance techniques in the prevention of EO-VAP in an open label randomized pilot trial of 20 subjects per study group i.e., 60 cases. The interventions will be in place for 7 days and the observational periods will be 14 days.

NCT ID: NCT06077695 Not yet recruiting - Head Trauma Clinical Trials

Cognitive Remediation of Working Memory Post Head Trauma

Meta-SCED
Start date: January 30, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Patients with working memory deficits due to a moderate to severe head injury will undergo a 5 month protocol including cognitive remediation with numerous exercises, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and therapeutic education.

NCT ID: NCT05195606 Not yet recruiting - Nursing Caries Clinical Trials

The Effect of Auditory and Tactile Stimuli in Traumatic Coma

Start date: June 15, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study focused on examining the effects of auditory and tactile stimuli to reduce sensory deprivation on consciousness, oxygen saturation and mean arterial pressure in traumatic coma patients.

NCT ID: NCT03704272 Not yet recruiting - Head Trauma Clinical Trials

Supervisory Neglect, Non-Accidental Trauma, Brief Intervention, and Treatment Referral

SunBrite
Start date: January 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The Supervisory Neglect, Non-Accidental Trauma, Brief Intervention, and Treatment Referral (SunBrite) protocol is a family-empowered, risk mitigation strategy that targets families with young children who present to the ED with intracranial trauma. Based on the widely utilized screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) protocol, SunBrite has 3 core components: screening, brief motivational interview, and referral for treatment. PCH will: 1) engage community partnerships to support SunBrite development; 2) utilize participatory action research approach for design, implementation, process evaluation, and dissemination of the pilot program; and 3) evaluate intervention implementation and pilot outcomes. Over a 2-year period, this study will encompass a pilot intervention and implementation assessment and a randomized trial to evaluate outcomes. Implementation of SunBrite will yield rigorous scientific evidence for a sustainable, evidenced-based, widely-needed non-accidental (NAT) screening and intervention for families with young children.

NCT ID: NCT02232347 Not yet recruiting - Head Trauma Clinical Trials

Ketamine and Glutamate After Brain Injury : a Microdialysis Study

KETABRAIN
Start date: October 2014
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The objective of the study is to compare the effects of 48 hours ketamine infusion versus sufentanil infusion on brain glutamate concentrations measured with microdialysis after traumatic brain injury. We hypothesize that ketamine infusion will decrease high glutamate values faster than sufentanil.

NCT ID: NCT01470040 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Traumatic Brain Injury

Does Discontinuation of Aspirin Treatment Following Head Trauma Decrease the Incidence of Chronic Subdural Hematoma?

Start date: February 2012
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Anti-aggregation therapy, including treatment with low-dose aspirin (LDA) is an established risk factor for intracranial hemorrhage, including chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH); however evidence guiding the decision to continue or discontinue LDA in patients who have sustained mild head trauma with no sign of injury on CT is lacking. The investigators aim to assess whether continued aspirin treatment increases the risk of CSDH in mild head trauma patients 50 years and older who present with negative head CT. The investigators further aim to use the initial findings to refine the study design, with the goal of performing a larger, multi-institutional study in the future. Over a 12-month period, approximately 100 patients ≥50 years of age on LDA prophylaxis presenting to Hadassah's Emergency Department after sustaining mild head injury, will be examined by the neurosurgeon on call. Those who have no sign of intracranial hemorrhage at clinical or CT examination, and who meet inclusion / exclusion criteria, will be invited to participate in a randomized study. Informed consent will be obtained. Patients will be remotely randomized for continuation or cessation of LDA treatment. Follow-up CT and clinical examination will be performed 3-5 weeks after trauma. The two-proportions test will be used to assess whether there is a statistically significant difference in the rate of CSDH in patients randomized to cessation of LDA therapy and those randomized to continuation of LDA. Relationships between the explanatory the dependent variables will be explored with classical parametric and nonparametric statistical methods, including multivariate analysis, logistic regression, the two proportions test, and the independence test. Several measures of association/correlation between pairs of variables will be analyzed as well. The investigators hypothesize that continuation of LDA will not be associated with increased risk for chronic subdural hematoma, and that cessation of treatment will not be associated with a decrease in chronic subdural hematoma. The investigators further hypothesize that cessation of LDA for this period will not be associated with increased risk for clinically significant cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, thrombotic, of embolic event.