Head and Neck Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
Implementation of a Standardized Tracheostomy Education Discharge Protocol
The purpose of this study is to identify and establish a safe and effective tracheostomy teaching protocol for caregivers. Results of this study will help in the development of a discharge protocol that allows for caregiver confidence and activation in tracheostomy care for patients.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 75 |
Est. completion date | July 1, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | January 1, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: Patient participants: - Diagnosis of malignancy of the head and neck requiring reconstruction and temporary tracheostomy - No previous record of tracheostomy - Has an identified family caregiver who is willing to participate - Has the tracheostomy in place for at least 10 days after discharge Caregiver participants: - Family member or friend, who is 18 years or older, of an adult patient described above - Identified by the patient as his/her primary caregiver who is providing daily assistance Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who do not have a caregiver - Caregivers who are illiterate. - Caregivers with previous tracheostomy experience. - Patients who are decannulated from tracheostomy prior to discharge. - Patients discharged to a skilled nursing facility at the time of discharge. - Patients who are tolerating continuous tracheostomy capping at time of discharge |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center | Cleveland | Ohio |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Patient-Caregiver Activation Survey scores | Caregiver activation in managing their family members' tracheostomy after implementation of a standardized discharge program as measured by the Patient-Caregiver Activation Survey. This is a validated survey assessing caregiver consisting of 13 questions designed to determined confidence in taking care of their loved one. Scores range from 4 to 52, with higher score indicates higher degree of caregiver activation | At time of surgery, an average of 15 minutes | |
Primary | Patient-Caregiver Activation Survey scores | Caregiver activation in managing their family members' tracheostomy after implementation of a standardized discharge program as measured by the Patient-Caregiver Activation Survey. This is a validated survey assessing caregiver consisting of 13 questions designed to determined confidence in taking care of their loved one. Scores range from 4 to 52, with higher score indicates higher degree of caregiver activation | At discharge (an average of 7 days after surgery), an average of 15 minutes | |
Primary | Patient-Caregiver Activation Survey scores | Caregiver activation in managing their family members' tracheostomy after implementation of a standardized discharge program as measured by the Patient-Caregiver Activation Survey. This is a validated survey assessing caregiver consisting of 13 questions designed to determined confidence in taking care of their loved one. Scores range from 4 to 52, with higher score indicates higher degree of caregiver activation | At first follow-up (1 week after discharge), an average of 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Feasibility Questionnaire scores | The feasibility questionnaire evaluates the necessity, acceptability and feasibility of the of the implementation of a standardized discharge program. Questions are related to readiness and willingness to participate in tracheostomy care. It will assess feasibility in attending tracheostomy teaching sessions by nurses and their baseline comfort in tracheostomy care and their enthusiasm in learning tracheostomy care. Questionnaire consists of 12 questions, with scores ranging from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher feasibility of tracheostomy protocol implementation. | At time of surgery, an average of 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short form scores | Safety, as measured by the PROMIS scores - 7-item questionnaire that assess self-reported anxiety in the family caregiver. A higher score correlates with a higher level of anxiety. Scores range from 7 to 25, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of anxiety | At time of surgery, an average of 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short form scores | Safety, as measured by the PROMIS scores - 7-item questionnaire that assess self-reported anxiety in the family caregiver. A higher score correlates with a higher level of anxiety. A higher score correlates with a higher level of anxiety. Scores range from 7 to 25, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of anxiety | At discharge (an average of 7 days after surgery), an average of 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short form scores | Safety, as measured by the PROMIS scores - 7-item questionnaire that assess self-reported anxiety in the family caregiver. A higher score correlates with a higher level of anxiety. A higher score correlates with a higher level of anxiety. Scores range from 7 to 25, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of anxiety | At first follow-up (1 week after discharge), an average of 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Preparedness Caregiver Scale (PCS) | PCS scores - Response categories correspond to the level of preparedness. Scale consists of 9 questions, with scores ranging from 0 to 4 with high score indicating the more prepared the caregiver feels for caregiving. | At discharge (an average of 7 days after surgery), an average of 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Preparedness Caregiver Scale (PCS) | PCS scores - Response categories correspond to the level of preparedness. Scale consists of 9 questions, with scores ranging from 0 to 4 with high score indicating the more prepared the caregiver feels for caregiving. | At first follow-up (1 week after discharge), an average of 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Tracheostomy Care Competency Assessment | Effectiveness will be measured with the tracheostomy care competency assessment. This survey will be an individual's subjective assessment of his or her knowledge of tracheostomy care. A 5-point Likert scale will be used from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree" and assess different aspects of tracheostomy care outlined during their tracheostomy teaching provided by nurses. This assessment includes 12 questions with scores ranging from from 12 to 60 with higher scores indicating higher competency.
Results form pre-implementation to post-implementation will be compared using a paired t-test or McNemar tes |
At discharge (an average of 7 days after surgery), an average of 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Tracheostomy Care Competency Assessment | Effectiveness will be measured with the tracheostomy care competency assessment. This survey will be an individual's subjective assessment of his or her knowledge of tracheostomy care. A 5-point Likert scale will be used from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree" and assess different aspects of tracheostomy care outlined during their tracheostomy teaching provided by nurses. This assessment includes 12 questions with scores ranging from from 12 to 60 with higher scores indicating higher competency.
Results form pre-implementation to post-implementation will be compared using a paired t-test or McNemar tes |
At first follow-up (1 week after discharge), an average of 15 minutes | |
Secondary | Average tracheostomy-related healthcare utilization costs | Effectiveness will be measured with the tracheostomy care competency assessment. This survey will be an individual's subjective assessment of his or her knowledge of tracheostomy care. A 5-point Likert scale will be used from 1 "strongly disagree" to 5 "strongly agree" and assess different aspects of tracheostomy care outlined during their tracheostomy teaching provided by nurses. This assessment includes 12 questions with scores ranging from from 12 to 60 with higher scores indicating higher competency.
Results form pre-implementation to post-implementation will be compared using a paired t-test or McNemar tes |
Pre-implementation (up to 6 months prior to surgery) | |
Secondary | Average tracheostomy-related healthcare utilization costs | Average pre and post-implementation tracheostomy-related healthcare utilization costs | Post-implementation, 30 days after discharge | |
Secondary | Nursing survey | Effectiveness will be measured with the Nursing Survey scores. This is an 11 question survey designed to capture the amount of phone calls nurses receive regarding tracheostomy related questions over the last 6 months.
Results form pre-implementation to post-implementation will be compared using a paired t-test or McNemar tes |
Pre-implementation (up to 6 months prior to surgery) | |
Secondary | Nursing survey | Effectiveness will be measured with the Nursing Survey scores. This is an 11 question survey designed to capture the amount of phone calls nurses receive regarding tracheostomy related questions over the last 6 months.
Results form pre-implementation to post-implementation will be compared using a paired t-test or McNemar tes |
Post-implementation, 30 days after discharge | |
Secondary | Number of emergency department visits, urgent care or outpatient appointments post-discharge | Number of emergency department visits, urgent care or outpatient appointments, relating to post-discharge assessment of feasibility and safety of intervention | Post-implementation, 30 days after discharge | |
Secondary | Average number of tracheostomy-related phone calls per week post-discharge | Post-discharge assessment of feasibility, as measured by average number of tracheostomy-related phone calls per week | Post-implementation, 30 days after discharge |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05808920 -
The RESCUE Study: Survival and Functional Outcomes Following Salvage Surgery for RESidual or reCurrent sqUamous cEll Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
|
||
Completed |
NCT02526017 -
Study of Cabiralizumab in Combination With Nivolumab in Patients With Selected Advanced Cancers
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05060432 -
Study of EOS-448 With Standard of Care and/or Investigational Therapies in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03997643 -
Preservation of Swallowing in Respected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Examining Radiation Volume Effects (PRESERVE): A Randomized Trial
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04700475 -
Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy on Prevention of Radiotherapy Induced Xerostomia in Cancer Patients.
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04058145 -
AMD3100 Plus Pembrolizumab in Immune Checkpoint Blockade Refractory Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02572869 -
Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes After Mandible Reconstruction With Fibula Osteomyocutaneous Free Flaps
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04474470 -
A Study to Evaluate NT219 Alone and in Combination With ERBITUX® (Cetuximab) in Adults With Advanced Solid Tumors and Head and Neck Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05073809 -
Photoacoustic Imaging of Head and Neck Tumours
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04383210 -
Study of Seribantumab in Adult Patients With NRG1 Gene Fusion Positive Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03651570 -
Randomized Controlled Trial of a E-intervention to Help Patients Newly Diagnosed With Cancer Cope Better: Pilot Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04930432 -
Study of MCLA-129, a Human Bispecific EGFR and cMet Antibody, in Patients With Advanced NSCLC and Other Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06016699 -
Immunological Function After Radiation With Either Proton or Photon Therapy
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03843554 -
Commensal Oral Microbiota in Head and Neck Cancer
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05915572 -
Mulligan Technique on Shoulder Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05897983 -
Tens and Rocabado Exercises on TMJ Dysfunction
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06289049 -
Heavy Strength Training in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05263648 -
Virtual Reality Software to Reduce Stress in Cancer Patients
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03238638 -
A Study of Epacadostat + Pembrolizumab in Head and Neck Cancer Patients, Who Failed Prior PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy
|
Phase 2 |