Radiation Therapy With or Without Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Advanced Cancer of the Larynx

Head and Neck Cancer Clinical Trial

Official title:

PHASE III TRIAL TO PRESERVE THE LARYNX: INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIATION THERAPY VERSUS CONCOMITANT CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIATION THERAPY VERSUS RADIATION THERAPY

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00002496
• Other study ID #: RTOG-9111
• Secondary ID: CDR0000077756EST
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: November 1, 1999
• Last updated: January 23, 2014
• Start date: August 1992
• Est. completion date: November 2013

Study information

• Verified date: January 2014
• Source: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Federal Government
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known if chemotherapy plus radiation therapy is more effective than radiation therapy alone in treating patients with advanced cancer of the larynx.

PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy in treating patients with advanced cancer of the larynx.

Description:

OBJECTIVES: I. Compare, in a phase III setting, overall and disease-free survival with preservation of laryngeal function in patients with stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic and supraglottic larynx treated with cisplatin/fluorouracil (CDDP/5-FU) followed by radiotherapy vs. concomitant radiotherapy plus CDDP vs. radiotherapy alone. II. Compare the tumor response after completion of chemotherapy but prior to initiation of radiotherapy with that following completion of radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. III. Compare the patterns of relapse (local and regional recurrence and distant metastasis) with these treatments. IV. Compare the incidence of second primary tumors in patients treated on these three regimens. V. Compare the acute and chronic adverse effects of these three regimens. VI. Compare the morbidity experienced with neck dissection and/or laryngeal salvage surgery following treatment with these regimens. VII. Compare quality of life of patients with laryngeal preservation vs. patients requiring salvage laryngectomies. VIII. Compare the quality of life of patients receiving radiotherapy alone vs. those receiving chemotherapy as well.

OUTLINE: Randomized study. Patients on any arm, clinically staged N+ undergo neck dissection following completion of radiotherapy. Arm I: 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy followed by Radiotherapy. Cisplatin, CDDP, NSC-119875; Fluorouracil, 5-FU, NSC-19893; followed by regional irradiation using linear accelerators with photon energies of 1.25-6 MV, electron energies of 8-17 MeV, or Co60. Arm II: Radiotherapy plus Single-Agent Chemotherapy/Radiosensitization. Regional irradiation using equipment as in Arm I; plus CDDP. Arm III: Radiotherapy. Regional irradiation using equipment as in Arm I.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: 546 patients (182/arm) will be entered over approximately 3 years. If any arm is clearly inferior in laryngectomy-free survival after 137 patients have completed 2 years of follow-up study, that arm will be closed to further accrual. A second interim analysis will be conducted after 410 patients have completed 2 years of follow-up.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 0
• Est. completion date: November 2013
• Est. primary completion date: August 2002
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Biopsy-proven, previously untreated, squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic and supraglottic larynx that would normally require total laryngectomy Stage III/IV disease (excluding T1 and M1) Endoscopic tumor staging required within 4 weeks of entry Tumors must be considered resectable and potentially curable with conventional surgery and radiotherapy T4 disease limited to: Up to 1 cm invasion of the base of tongue Questionable cartilage invasion on CT (clinically T3) Measurable disease required No synchronous primary tumors No subglottic tumors

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 18 and over Performance status: Karnofsky 60%-100% Hematopoietic: (obtained within 3 weeks of entry) WBC at least 3,500 Platelets at least 100,000 Hepatic: Not specified Renal: (obtained within 2 weeks of entry) Creatinine clearance at least 50 mL/min (measured or calculated) Serum calcium normal Cardiovascular: Status adequate to tolerate all protocol therapy Pulmonary: Status adequate to tolerate all protocol therapy Other: Nutritional status adequate to tolerate all protocol therapy Mental status adequate to follow instructions and keep appointments No second malignancy except nonmelanomatous skin cancer (Patients who have been disease-free for at least 3 years following treatment for a prior cancer may be eligible at the discretion of the protocol chairman) Negative pregnancy test required of fertile women Effective contraception required of fertile women

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: No prior therapy Chemotherapy: No prior therapy Endocrine therapy: No prior therapy Radiotherapy: No prior radiotherapy to the head and neck Surgery: No prior therapy

Study Design

Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Head and Neck Cancer
• Head and Neck Neoplasms

Intervention

Drug:
• chemotherapy

• cisplatin

• fluorouracil

Procedure:
• conventional surgery

Radiation:
• low-LET cobalt-60 gamma ray therapy

• low-LET electron therapy

• low-LET photon therapy

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
South Africa	Pretoria Academic Hospital	Pretoria
United States	Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center	Boston	Massachusetts
United States	New England Medical Center Hospital	Boston	Massachusetts
United States	Ireland Cancer Center	Cleveland	Ohio
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Atlanta (Decatur)	Decatur	Georgia
United States	CCOP - Colorado Cancer Research Program, Inc.	Denver	Colorado
United States	CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association	Des Moines	Iowa
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - East Orange	East Orange	New Jersey
United States	CCOP - Northern New Jersey	Hackensack	New Jersey
United States	Indiana University Cancer Center	Indianapolis	Indiana
United States	Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Indianapolis (Roudebush)	Indianapolis	Indiana
United States	CCOP - Kalamazoo	Kalamazoo	Michigan
United States	CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association	Peoria	Illinois
United States	Hahnemann University Hospital	Philadelphia	Pennsylvania
United States	University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute	Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania
United States	CCOP - Metro-Minnesota	Saint Louis Park	Minnesota
United States	H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute	Tampa	Florida
United States	CCOP - Carle Cancer Center	Urbana	Illinois

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group	Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Southwest Oncology Group

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  South Africa, 

References & Publications (18)

Bourhis J, Amand C, Pignon JP, et al.: Update of MACH-NC (Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy In Head & Neck Cancer ) database focused on concomitant chemotherapy. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 12 (Suppl 14): A-5505, 489s, 2004.

Coyne JC, Pajak TF, Harris J, Konski A, Movsas B, Ang K, Watkins Bruner D; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Emotional well-being does not predict survival in head and neck cancer patients: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study. Cancer. 2007 Dec 1;110(11):2568-75. — View Citation

Dilling TJ, Bae K, Paulus R, Watkins-Bruner D, Garden AS, Forastiere A, Kian Ang K, Movsas B. Impact of gender, partner status, and race on locoregional failure and overall survival in head and neck cancer patients in three radiation therapy oncology group trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 1;81(3):e101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.013. Epub 2011 May 5. — View Citation

Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M, Pajak TF, Weber R, Morrison W, Glisson B, Trotti A, Ridge JA, Chao C, Peters G, Lee DJ, Leaf A, Ensley J, Cooper J. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J M — View Citation

Forastiere AA, Maor M, Weber RS, et al.: Long-term results of intergroup RTOG 91-11: a phase III trial to preserve the larynx--Induction cisplatin/5-FU and radiation therapy versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation therapy versus radiation therapy. [Abst

Konski A, Bhargavan M, Owen J, et al.: The price of failure: economic analysis of recurrence and complications of patients treated on RTOG 91-11. [Abstract] The American Radium Society 89th Annual Meeting, May 5-29, 2007, Amsterdam, Netherlands. A-SS-6, 3, 2007.

Konski AA, Bhargavan M, Owen J, et al.: The addition of chemotherapy to radiation is cost-effective in the treatment of patients with locally advanced laryngeal cancer: an economic analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 91-11. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66 (3 Suppl 1): A-115, S66, 2006.

Konski AA, Pajak T, Movsas B, et al.: Socio-demographic variables influence outcome in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group head and neck trials. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22 (Suppl 14): A-6043, 529s, 2004.

Machtay M, Moughan J, Trotti A, et al.: Pre-treatment and treatment related risk factors for severe late toxicity after chemo-RT for head and neck cancer: an RTOG analysis. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-5500, 280s, 2006.

Machtay M, Moughan J, Trotti A, Garden AS, Weber RS, Cooper JS, Forastiere A, Ang KK. Factors associated with severe late toxicity after concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: an RTOG analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3582-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8841. Epub 2008 Jun 16. — View Citation

Maor MH, Berkey B, Forastiere A, et al.: Larynx preservation and tumor control in stage III and IV laryngeal cancer: a three-arm randomized intergroup trial: RTOG 91-11. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54(2 suppl 1): 2-3, 2002.

Movsas B, Konski A, Pajak T, et al.: Quality of life (QOL) variables influence local regional control in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) headsneck trials (9003 and 9111). [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60 (1 Suppl 1): A-199, S252, 2004.

Mukherji SK, Toledano AY, Beldon C, Schmalfuss IM, Cooper JS, Sicks JD, Amdur R, Sailer S, Loevner LA, Kousouboris P, Ang K. Interobserver reliability of computed tomography-derived primary tumor volume measurement in patients with supraglottic carcinoma. Cancer. 2005 Jun 15;103(12):2616-22. — View Citation

O'Meara EA, Machtay M, Moughan J, et al.: Associations between radiation doses to pharyngeal regions and severe late toxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: an RTOG analysis. [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69 (3): A-96, S54-5, 2007.

Siddiqui F, Pajak TF, Watkins-Bruner D, Konski AA, Coyne JC, Gwede CK, Garden AS, Spencer SA, Jones C, Movsas B. Pretreatment quality of life predicts for locoregional control in head and neck cancer patients: a radiation therapy oncology group analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Feb 1;70(2):353-60. Epub 2007 Sep 24. — View Citation

Spiegel D, Kraemer HC. Emotional well-being does not predict survival in head and neck cancer patients: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study. Cancer. 2008 May 15;112(10):2326-7; author reply 2327-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23435. — View Citation

Weber RS, Berkey BA, Forastiere A, Cooper J, Maor M, Goepfert H, Morrison W, Glisson B, Trotti A, Ridge JA, Chao KS, Peters G, Lee DJ, Leaf A, Ensley J. Outcome of salvage total laryngectomy following organ preservation therapy: the Radiation Therapy Onco — View Citation

Wolf GT. Commentary: phase III trial to preserve the larynx: induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy--intergroup trial R91-11. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Sep 15;19(18 Suppl):28S-31S. — View Citation

* Note: There are 18 references in all — Click here to view all references