View clinical trials related to HBV.
Filter by:Prospective, non-pharmacological, single-center, non-profit observational study. The study design allows longitudinal evaluation of the immune response during the natural history of the infection and/or treatment, correlating the data with the outcome of the disease and antiviral therapies, which will be collected as study variables from the source documents. The study population will be patients suffering from chronic HBV infection with or without HBV-HDV co-infection followed at the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology of Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico. The present study is part of an international cooperation project between the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (Milan, Italy) and the Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, financed by a grant (project MAECI-2023-23683653) and divided into two specific Work Packages: - WP 1 Milan team (WP1.1 - Clinical and virological phenotyping of CHB and CHD patients; WP1.2 - Clinical evaluation of rapid HBV T cell test in CHB and CHD populations) - WP 2 Singapore team (WP2.1 - Applicability of the rapid T cell assay approach; WP 2.2 - Optimization of the rapid T cell assay protocol) The primary objective of the study is to define the prevalence of specific T cell responses in patients with chronic HBV and HBV-HDV infection, through the application of a specific rapid T cell assay.
Solid Organ Transplantation (SOT) is made possible by the use of a lifelong immunosuppressive treatment. This treatment limits the response of the immune system, enabling long-term survival of the transplanted organ, but also leading to weaker anti-infectious responses. In this study, we will compare the response to a booster Hepatitis B vaccination (HBV) in SOT patients, either after kidney or liver transplantation. We will also compare the immune response depending on the immunosuppressive treatment. In order to provide a detailed picture of the immune response, we will investigate the usual serological response (anti-HBs antibodies), but also the cellular memory (both T and B) using ELISpot assays and flow-cytometry, over a 6 months period following booster vaccination.
The goal of this prospective, exploratory, non-intervention, multi-center, real-world study is to investigate the predictive value of HBV pgRNA in the occurrence of long-term outcomes under antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Participants will take the necessary clinical examination and blood draw during the patient's treatment and follow-up, and all the treatment is determined by clinicians.
The TRI-MOM program aims to implement and evaluate a simplified (based on inexpensive rapid diagnostic tests), integrated (in governmental health facilities) and coordinated (between health care workers) strategy for the triple elimination of HIV, syphilis and HBV mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) in nine maternal and child health services, 5 in Burkina Faso and 4 in The Gambia. The TRI-MOM program has two components: 1. an "intervention" component consisting of a pilot study to reinforce the antenatal screening and prevention of MTCT (PMTCT) capacities for the 3 targeted infections through the implementation of a simplified, integrated and coordinated strategy of triple elimination of MTCT. 2. an "evaluation" component which will assess the impact of the TRI-MOM strategy on PMTCT services, reduction of HBV MTCT and women empowerment.
Study type: Phase 2 - Interventional Trial Number of patients to be enrolled: 105 Participating countries: Italy Study drugs: nivolumab and ipilimumab Cohort A: HBV and HCV patients Cohort B: HIV patients Cohort C: Long COVID syndrome The stratification factors are HBV/HCV positive (cohort A), HIV positive (cohort B), patients with Long Covid syndrome (Cohort C), histology (squamous vs non-squamous histology), and gender (male vs female).
In the current literature, infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) is described as one of the main risk factors for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). According to the current study situation, the Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is considered as an important marker, since low levels and sero-clearance of HBsAg are both correlated with a lower risk of HCC development / recurrence.Currently there is no treatment option available that efficiently targets HBsAg. Besides neutralizing infectious HBV virions, Hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIG) can directly bind and neutralize extracellular HBsAg/SVPs, and even intracellular HBsAg targeting is reported. In addition, HBIGs can initiate effector-cell attack (via antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, ADCC) towards infected hepatocytes. The potential benefit of HBIGs in the HCC context is further underlined by recent evidence for the ability of HBIGs to reduce the viability, proliferation, and self-renewal of tumor-initiating cells (TICs) - isolated from HBV-HCC patients - accompanied by downregulation of stemness markers, e.g., OCT-4.According to the current study situation, the use of HBIGs significantly reduces the risk of HBV reinfection after transplantation and improves the results of liver transplantation in patients with chronic HBV infection. The potential benefit of treating HBV-HCC patients on the LTx (liver transplantation) waiting list with hepatitis B immunoglobulin is the possible stop or inhibition of tumor progression while waiting for an LTx. So far there is no clinical evidence of this. Mechanistically, hepatitis B immunoglobulin could occur through neutralization of circulating HBsAg, which is an important driver of an immunosuppressive environment in HBV patients, and possibly through direct effects against HBV HCC tumor cells (through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, ADCC). Therefore, the idea behind preoperative HBIG administration before liver transplantation is to reduce the rate of patients in whom a transplantation would no longer have been possible due to tumor progression. Thus, due to tumor progression in HBV-positive HCC-patients there is a monthly drop-out from the waiting list of about 4%. The basic idea behind the treatment of HBV-HCC patients before tumor resection with hepatitis B immunoglobulin is to potentially stop or positively influence tumor progression through the effects mentioned above, in the time between diagnosis and resection. Zhou et al. (2015) have shown a connection between HBsAg levels and HCC relapses after resection, although the exact role of HBsAg is still unclear. In no case will the treatment postpone the time of tumor resection, as only patients are considered who, for clinical reasons, can expect a certain time until resection. The present proof of concept study aims to quantify HBsAg reduction due to preoperative administration of HBIGs in HBV-positive HCC-patients and serve as a template for future multicentre clinical trials.
In a population of cirrhotics patients who did not responde to an anti-HBV vaccination according to the recommended vaccination, the goal is to : Describe the proportion of patients with HBs antibody levels greater than 10mUI/mL at 1 month of the last injection of vaccine ; with a M0-M1-M6 vaccine regimen using 3 vaccines strategies : - After simple intramuscular vaccine (IM) ( Control group ) - After simple intradermal vaccine - after IMIQUIMOD's application followed by intradermal vaccine administration The main hypothesis of this study is : IMIQUIMOD acts as an immunity booster, so the combination of IMIQUIMOD with an intra-dermal injection of the anti-HBV vaccine allows better acquisition of post-vaccination immunization.
Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) is an emerging issue and a potentially life-threatening complication to patients with history of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection whose immune system is deficient or suppressed. It is estimated that the risk of HBVr ranges 20%-50% in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Not only HBsAg-positive patients but also HBsAg-negative/antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc)-positive patients (resolved hepatitis B) have the risk of HBVr. Recent studies also reported that the risk of HBVr associated with TNF-α inhibitor treatment widely ranged from 12.3% to 62.5%. Antiviral prophylaxis by nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) is recommended for patients with high risk of HBVr according to 2018 AASLD guidance. Phase 3 studies reported that tenofovir alafenamide (Vemlidy, TAF) can effectively suppress HBV in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients, and TAF is superior to TDF in safety profiles and ALT normalization. However, the evidence of TAF in prevention HBV reactivation for patients with HBsAg-positive and imflammatory arthritis, who need bDMARDs are still missing.
Liver transplantation is currently the only effective way to treat end-stage liver disease.The shortage of donor liver is still the major problem. Incidence of HBcAb+ varies between different regions. The HBcAb positive rate could be as high as 52% in China.HBcAb positive donor liver may enlarge donor pool and thus save ESLD patients. However, the use of HBcAb positive donor liver may induce HBV infection in hepatitis B negative recipient after liver transplantation. Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has better stability in plasma and higher liver targeting property in comparison with tenofovir (TDF), with an extra amide bond, which allows strong antiviral effect with much less doses and reducing the renal and bone injury. Our study intends to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HBV prophylaxis treatment of TAF in HBV negative patients after receiving HBcAb positive donor livers.
This is a multicenter, single arm, open label, historical control pilot Study to the antiviral efficacy and safety of Suboptimal Responders to Entecavir Switching to TAF Treatment at week 48 (investigate the rates of complete virological response on switching to TAF in patients with Suboptimal response or ETV intolerance to standard ETV= 0.5 mg monotherapy).