View clinical trials related to Hand Surgery.
Filter by:Distal surgery of the upper limb under local anesthesia using the WALANT technique (Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet) has become the standard care in orthopedic surgery. The principle is that the operator infiltrates the whole surgical area with a 1% lidocaine solution combined with adrenaline (diluted to 1/200,000) so that all distal surgery of the upper limb can be performed without a tourniquet. Thus, the perioperative course and management of the patient in the operating room and the constraints inherent to general anesthesia are largely reduced. Also, the material cost is considerably reduced. However, WALANT often induces significant pain when the patient leaves the operating room to return home. This effect is related to the pharmacological formulation of lidocaine which has a short half-life (< 3h). To reduce this inconvenience of early block removal, adding a local anesthetic with a longer duration of action (ropivacaine) to lidocaine would extend the duration of the analgesic, improving postoperative experience and satisfaction. The main objective of this research is to evaluate the effect of two WALANT anesthesia protocols (with or without the addition of ropivacaine) on the postoperative experience of patients (QoR-40 questionnaire) 48 hours after outpatient hand surgery.
Hand Surgery is surgery of the hand, the wrist, and the peripheral nerves of the upper limb. Many different types of surgeries can be performed on the hand, depending on the underlying cause of the problem such as Closed reduction and fixation, Tendon repair, Skin grafts, Skin flaps, Carpal Tunnel Release, and ganglion removal. Hand surgery is usually associated with marked postoperative pain. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia is usually performed in patients undergoing hand surgery. This study aims to compare Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block and axillary block and assess the degree of motor power and duration by testing hand grip strength using a hydraulic hand dynamometer in patients undergoing hand surgery. Objectives: To determine the degree of a motor block using a hydraulic hand dynamometer. To Estimate time needed to regain full motor activity. To identify whether ultrasound-guided axillary block may preserve motor function to a greater extent than infraclavicular blocks.
Further studies are needed to establish the effects of WALANT in performing most common hand surgeries, in relation to its clinical outcomes and intraoperative blood loss. Therefore, this study aims to identify the best interval time to perform elective hand surgeries using WALANT technique, document clinical outcomes and identify potential complications
Effect of 2%Articaine versus 5%bupivacaine in pt undergoing short duration surgery in upper limb
A major innovation in hand surgery in the last decade is the popularization of Wide Awake Hand Surgery (WAHS). This technique consists of numbing the surgical area with local anesthesia with epinephrine and allowing the patient to actively move their hand intra-operatively to assess the strength and quality of repairs or fixations. Despite its theoretical advantages, the application in clinical practice has seldom spread further than simple hand operations, such as carpal tunnel and trigger finger releases. In many institutions, the current standard of care for hand surgery is the brachial plexus block. The primary objective of the study to directly compare the effects of local anesthesia with minimal sedation, performed by the surgeon, and the brachial plexus block, performed by the anesthesiologist, on patient-reported quality of recovery. Currently, there are no studies in the surgical literature directly comparing patient-reported quality of recovery, post-operative pain control, or time efficiency between local anesthesia and the brachial plexus block in hand surgery. This lack of information is a major impediment to the acceptance and adoption of a simple yet effective anesthesia technique that may increase patient satisfaction and time efficiency in the operating room. This proposed prospective randomized controlled study will quantitatively compare local anesthesia and brachial plexus block on three fronts: 1) patient-reported recovery at 24-hours post-surgery using the validated Quality of Recovery 15 score (QoR-15), 2) post-operative pain and opioid use at 24-hours post-surgery, and 3) nonsurgical time (defined as the time elapsed from one surgery's end time to the next surgery's start time) as a metric for turnover efficiency. The investigators hypothesize that patients randomized to the local anesthesia group will have a more positive recovery experience, a similar pain profile compared to the brachial plexus block despite common beliefs, and a shorter anesthesia-related and nonsurgical time. The importance of patient-centered care cannot be understated in a successful and high-quality health care system. The results of this study will provide valuable information regarding the patient experience during their post- operative recovery.
The investigators of this study would like to see whether providing feedback to patients regarding their illness behavior/coping strategies, using online questionnaires, improves patient-physician communication in orthopaedic surgery. The investigators aim to enroll 128 patients.
Current best practice for performance of infraclavicular block dictates the use of a dual-endpoint nerve stimulation technique that still only results in a 79% success rate. Use of an ultrasound-guided technique has the potential to significantly improve success. A randomized, controlled study to evaluate this area remains to be performed and is required to demonstrate to anesthesiologists that an ultrasound-guided approach should supersede nerve stimulation as the technique of choice for infraclavicular block.
If operating on the anticoagulated patient has been safe for one of the investigators' surgeons for the past 10 years then providing prospective data that substantiates this could prevent complications related to the discontinuation of anticoagulation for hand surgery patients in the future.
Does ultrasound increases the success rate and if there is a difference in success rate between placing the local anesthetic centrally versus peripherally.
In an observer-blinded study ultrasound guidance and electrical nerve stimulation will be compared for lateral sagital infraclavicular blocks (LSIB). Block effectiveness, time consumption and patient acceptance will be registered in 80 patients. Ultrasound guidance may cause less discomfort and could be less time consuming than electrical nerve stimulation.