View clinical trials related to Hallux Valgus.
Filter by:We will screen all first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodeses performed between 2010 and 2022 in Helsinki University Hospital. Information about demographics and additional diagnoses will be yielded from data pool of medical records. Additionally we review pre- and post-operative x-rays for first MTP joint angles and OR records for operative techniques. Our aim is to find associations between those known variables and risk for reoperation in two years after operation.
Retrospective study of patients operated for hallux valgus deformity at our hospital (ostfold hospital trust) 5 years ago. Patients will be clinically examined, a weighted radiograph of the foot (traditional and newer parameters will be evaluated) and patient reported outcome measures (PROM) scores will be collected.
RCT to compare the effectiveness of PSI assisted Lapidus surgery vs conventional Lapidus surgery in hallux valgus.
Prospective, multicenter, unblinded study to evaluate outcomes of the Adductoplasty™ Procedure in combination with the Lapiplasty® Procedure for patients in need of metatarsus adductus and hallux valgus correction. Up to 80 subjects will be treated in this study at up to 13 clinical sites. Patients 14 years through 65 years with symptomatic metatarsus adductus and hallux valgus will be eligible to participate based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria defined in the study protocol.
Individuals with foot-ankle problems (plantar fasciitis, metarsalgia, pes planus, pes planovalgus/varus) will be included in the study. Permission was obtained from the research group that developed the scale to use the Original Foot Posture Index-6 (FPI-6). Cross-cultural adaptation of the FPI-6 will be made in line with the guidelines published by Ruberto and Beaton. First of all, the FPI-6 will be translated into Turkish by two translators whose native language is Turkish and who can speak English at an advanced level. Translations will be compared and discussed, and a Turkish version will be obtained with the equivalents that best represent each item in the texts. Secondly, this retranslated text will be independently translated back into English by two native English translators. In the third stage, two texts written in English will be synthesized by the authors, thus reaching a consensus on a single translation. Finally, the inconsistent parts of the text will be checked by a multidisciplinary team consisting of two native English-speaking translators, members of the English language and literature department, authors who developed the scale, and physiotherapists. Two independent physiotherapists will evaluate the participants' foot posture indexes by FPI-6 for inter-rater reliability. In addition, patients' quality of life, foot functions, hindfoot profiles will be evaluated. For the calculation of validity between measurements, rater-1 will apply the FPI-6 again to the same participants after 15 days for intra-rater reliability. Patients' functional independence, activities of daily living, and quality of life will also be evaluated for criterion validity. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society-AOFAS, SF-36 and Foot Function Index questionnaires will be applied for the validity of FPI-6.
The study in question is a post market clinical follow up (PMCF) study to evaluate the safety and performance of bioabsorbable headless compression screw Inion CompressOn in selected fracture, osteotomy and arthrodeses operations of the foot and ankle. The study recruits 125 adult patients who meet the acceptance criteria. The follow-up time for each study patient is 4 years. The study is a single center single group study which is conducted in Tampere University Hospital (TAYS) in Finland. The main focus of the study in terms of performance is to evaluate the bone healing/ossification of operated areas. The main focus of the study in terms of safety is to evaluate the occurrence of adverse events and required revision surgeries that are or might be related to the study device.
This is a two-arm randomized controlled trial with the aim to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of post-operative management after a modified Lapidus arthrodesis with/without an Akin or a Weil/Hohmann surgery fusion with immediate complete weight-bearing compared with partial weight-bearing (10 - 15kg) for 6 weeks as a novel approach for rehabilitation after a foot surgery.
The goal of the study is to gather sufficient patient data to assess real world postoperative function after a first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis done in conjunction with first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis (TMT) (double fusion). Many studies have demonstrated the success of a first MTP joint arthrodesis in eliminating pain and reducing the intermetatarsal angle. Very little research has been published to assess the outcomes of double arthrodesis. Limited research has specifically assessed patients' everyday function and gait following MTP arthrodesis and no studies are available to assess real world function following double arthrodesis. More data that includes patient reported function during activities of daily living is needed to understand the benefits and draw backs of combined first MTP/TMT joint arthrodesis used to treat and correct first ray deformity.
This clinical investigation was led as a post-market clinical follow-up study (post-market device development stage). Therefore, its objectives were as follows: - To assess functional clinical score's evolution, - To evaluate patient's satisfaction - To confirm safety of varisation staples The target population for this study was any adult patient implanted with VEOFIX varisation staples in their intended uses between 15/02/2021 and 15/05/2021. Patients were implanted and followed as per standard of care led in the investigational site. The following regulation and guidelines were followed for this investigation: - Standard ISO 14155:2020 "Good Clinical Practice"undirectly applicable; - Regulation (UE) 2016/679 (RGPD) ; - Regulation (UE) 2017/745 (MDR) ; - MEDDEV 2.12.1; - Local regulation (loi " jardé ", loi " informatique et libertés "). As per its design, the investigation is considered as involving human beings, and therefore require submission to an ethic committee or declaration to a Competent Authority (ANSM) and CPP. This study was registered on CPP (CPP Ile de France VII).
This is a Phase 2b, randomized, double blind, placebo and active controlled study with an Ascending Dose Stage and an optional Dose Expansion Stage in subjects undergoing bunionectomy.