View clinical trials related to Hallucinations.
Filter by:This study seeks to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of nelotanserin for the treatment of visual hallucinations (VHs) and Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD) in subjects with Lewy body dementia (LBD).
To investigate the treatment effect of continuous transcranial magnetic stimulation on schizophrenia patients with auditory hallucinations, and the underlying neural mechanism by functional MRI
The study is a pilot study of Cognitive therapy for people with psychosis who have distressing visual hallucinations. The aim is to evaluate whether this is an acceptable, feasible and effective treatment. This is a pilot study and there is no randomisation to either CBT or treatment as usual (TAU). If a participant is allocated to the cognitive therapy plus TAU condition then the participant will meet with a therapist on initially a weekly basis and receive up to 8 sessions of CBT over a 2 month period. The participant will also have regular assessments conducted by a researcher who is independent to the treatment group. It is predicted that those people receiving CBT will improve on measures of symptoms, and particularly for measures of visual hallucinations.
The present study aims to investigate whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) reduces auditory hallucinations in patients with psychosis. In addition, the neuronal changes of tDCS will be examined.
Youths diagnosed with early onset schizophrenia will demonstrate amelioration of auditory hallucinations after one week of twice daily treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
The potential of non-invasive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as a therapeutic tool for improving schizophrenic symptoms, in particular resistant hallucinations, has been increasingly studied over the past decades. Several studies have demonstrated that low-frequency patterns of repetitive TMS (rTMS) applied over the left Temporoparietal Junction (TPJ), which are known to decrease local activity, significantly reduced auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenic patients. In spite of highly promising results, a high level of inter-individual variability in the responses to non-invasive brain stimulation treatments, and the fact that rTMS may prove ineffective in some patients, keep spurring controversy about the efficacy of these approaches (as currently performed), as well as about how to increase its efficacy and consistency. Accordingly, the objectives of this project are to better understand the impact of rTMS on the brains of patients with resistant auditory hallucinations, and to use this information not only to better understand this condition but to develop more efficient and consistent therapies. Thus, in this study, the investigators focus more specifically on resistant auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia, which is a common symptom in schizophrenic patients, and can be treated by rTMS. The investigators hypothesize that there is a baseline difference in anatomical and/or functional connectivity between responder and non-responder patients who are treated with rTMS. Therefore, our project will aim to determine some anatomical and functional connectivity markers of response to rTMS treatment in patients with schizophrenia
The aim of the study is the examination of brain plasticity on verbal auditory hallucinations (AVH) after neuromodulation with fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) neurofeedback. During the training of fMRI neurofeedback subjects are trained to regulate consciously the connectivity of areas which are associated with hallucinations.The aim is to improve perceived hallucinations' intensity in everyday life of the patients as well as investigating the impact of neurofeedback on resting-state networks in the brain. As control groups, control subjects without AVH and participants with AVH, but no psychiatric diagnosis will be included.
Schizophrenia is a serious mental health disorder that affects approximately 1% of the population. Auditory hallucinations are present in as many as 50-75% of patients with this diagnosis. The hallucinations experienced by patients vary greatly and can severely impact an individual's ability to function on a daily basis. In approximately 25-30% of these patients, medication is an ineffective mechanism for managing these symptoms. These hallucinations are known as medication refractory auditory hallucination (MRAH). For those whose auditory hallucinations do not respond to medication, non-surgical brain stimulation (NBS) has recently shown promise as a therapeutic intervention. Two specific types of NBS, called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), seem particularly well suited to treating MRAH. They have yet to be compared to each other in large samples of patients with MRAH. The goal of the study is to investigate whether tRNS and tDCS are effective in the treatment of MRAH and if one is better than the other when compared directly.
This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will evaluate the efficacy of continuous apomorphine infusion compared to placebo in PD patients with visual hallucinations, inadequately controlled with clozapine and cholinesterase inhibitors.
This randomized, sham-controlled, double blind, multicentre clinical trial aims at providing evidence for the efficacy and safety of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) in the treatment of auditory hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia. Overall, the study will include 137 patients. Because of the adaptive study design, an interim analysis was performed after half of the originally planned patients (43/86), according to which the sample size was increased by 51 patients). Each patient will receive a three weeks course of daily (5/week) treatment; 50% of the patients will be treated with cTBS (1200 impulses daily), the other half with a sham stimulation to the left and right temporoparietal cortex. Sham stimulation will be applied by an active sham-coil that allows for a double-blind treatment. Follow-up assessments 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment will investigate the stability of treatment effects.