Hair Removal Clinical Trial
Official title:
Hair Removal by Intense Pulsed Light Versus Diode Laser: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of two hair removal techniques: Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) and Diode Laser in woman underarm. . Main Questions: - Determine the thread count in a 4cm² quadrant in the central axillary region before each session, 4-6 weeks after the last session and at follow-up 30 weeks after the last session; - Measure the thickness of the hair before each session, 4-6 weeks after the last session and at follow-up 6 months after the last session; - Compare the level of pain during procedures; - Evaluate the volunteer's level of satisfaction after the end of the sessions programmed by the study; - Evaluate quality of life and self-image before and after the end of the sessions programmed by the study; - Evaluate the maintenance of results 6 months after the last procedure performed. Researchers will compare IPL and Diode laser to see if hair removal is similar at short and long time course. The IPL treatment will be applied to one axilla. The 800nm Diode Laser treatment will be applied to the other axilla. Treatment allocation will be randomized for each participant. Participants will undergo monthly sessions for four months, totaling four treatments. Follow-up assessments will occur 30 days and 6 months after the final session.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 62 |
Est. completion date | July 30, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | November 30, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Female patients, - aged 18 and older, - with a complaint of hair in the axillary region, - Fitzpatrick skin phototype I to IV, - presenting dark hair Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who have used medications that alter hair production, - Patients who have used medications that are photosensitizing, - Patients who have used isotretinoin or vitamin A-synthesized acids, antibiotics such as tetracycline, - Patients using anticoagulant - Patients with vitiligo or epilepsy, - Pregnant or lactating individuals, - those with active herpes, - Patient with history of tumors, - Patient with axillary scarring (hyper or hypotrophic), - Patient who have used another method of hair removal involving complete hair removal by pulling with a minimum period of 30 days from the date of the initial assessment, or have used another laser hair removal method in the treatment area, - Immunocompromised patients, - Patients with sun-sensitive skin with inflammation, - Individuals with psoriasis, - Patients with tattoos on the application site, - Patients who have undergone ovary removal or have reached menopause |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Universidade Nove de Julho | São Paulo | SP |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Nove de Julho |
Brazil,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Adverse events | Adverse effects noted during and after treatments will be recorded | before each session (S0,Month1, Month2, Month3), 4-6 weeks after the last session (Month4) and at follow-up 24 weeks after the last session (Month 10). | |
Primary | Hair count | The counting of the hairs will be performed by observing the visible hairs in the treatment area photographs of the volunteers. In this way, a percentage comparison will be made in relation to the initial number of hairs. The hair count will be conducted in a 4cm² quadrant in the central axillary region. | before each session (S0,Month1, Month2, Month3), 4-6 weeks after the last session (Month4) and at follow-up 24 weeks after the last session (Month 10). | |
Primary | Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) | The photographs will be evaluated by two independent and blind evaluators, making a comparison between the photos before the procedure (S0) and the final effect of the short-term (S4) and long-term (S5) treatment. The evaluations will be classified according to the percentage of change: no results 0% reduction, bad reduction 0% to 25%, average 25% to 50%, good 50% to 75% and excellent 75%-100%. | 4-6 weeks after the last session (Month4) and at follow-up 24 weeks after the last session (Month 10). | |
Secondary | Hair Thickness | Images of the demarcated region will be obtained using a dermatoscope (5 images per region per assessment). The hair thickness will be measured using the Image J software (NIH). | before each session (S0,Month1, Month2, Month3), 4-6 weeks after the last session (Month4) and at follow-up 24 weeks after the last session (Month 10). | |
Secondary | Pain Score (Visual Analogue Scale) | Immediately after the end of the procedure in each armpit, the patient will respond using the visual analogue scale (VAS) to the sensation of pain perceived during the procedure.
It consists of a straight line, 10 centimeters long, where one end represents the total absence of pain and the other end represents the most intense pain possible. The person experiencing the pain is asked to mark a point on the line that represents the intensity of the pain they are experiencing. The marked point can be measured in centimeters from the end that represents the absence of pain. |
before each session (S0,Month1, Month2, Month3), 4-6 weeks after the last session (Month4) and at follow-up 24 weeks after the last session (Month 10). | |
Secondary | Quality of Live | The WHOQOL-bref quality of life questionnaire consists of 26 questions, with responses following a Likert scale (from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating better quality of life) his questionnaire includes 2 questions that assess overall quality of life, while the remaining questions make up 4 domains (physical, psychological, social relationships, and environment). | before first session (S0), and at follow-up 24 weeks after the last session (Month 10). | |
Secondary | Satisfaction level Score | The patient's satisfaction level with the treatment will be assessed through a questionnaire containing five multiple-choice questions. These questions will address the degree of discomfort experienced during the sessions, how many sessions this discomfort persisted, the satisfaction level regarding the achieved results, the perceived percentage improvement in the concern, and, finally, how likely the patient would recommend the undergone treatment to someone with a similar concern. Each response receive 1 up to 5 points, and the total Score varies from 4 to 20, being the highest as the highest the satisfaction. | At follow-up 24 weeks after the last session (Month 10). | |
Secondary | Self - Esteem Scale | The Self - Esteem Rosenberg Scale consists of 10 statements related to self-evaluation and self-acceptance. Respondents must indicate their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement on a response scale that typically ranges from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." The statements are mostly positive and are used to assess the extent to which a person feels positive or negative about themselves. | before first session (S0) and at follow-up 24 weeks after the last session (Month 10). |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00366964 -
The Efficacy Of The Wavelight Mydon Laser for Hair Removal And Treatment of Leg Veins
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04807205 -
Post Market Study Using The Elite IQ Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01578187 -
Hair2Go Label Comprehension and Usability Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01348789 -
Safety for Frequent Use Conditions of Hair Removal Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01348776 -
The Efficiency of the Hair2Go Device: A Prospective, Open, Label Study With Before-After Design
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01057134 -
Ultrasound Device for Hair Removal
|
||
Completed |
NCT01282866 -
Hair Count Reduction Verification Study With the LightSheer Duet HS Handpiece
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01529931 -
Long Term Efficiency of the Hair2Go Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01801202 -
Clinical Evaluation of LightSheer Duet 805nm HS Handpiece
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02912013 -
The Efficacy of the Me Mini Device for Hair Removal
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02318654 -
Ice Versus EMLA for Pain in Laser Hair Removal
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03438929 -
Evaluation of Diolaze XL Blended Mode for Hair Removal
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03945383 -
Clinical Investigation of Safety and Effectiveness of Emerald IPLdevice
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03921814 -
Sunstone IPL (Intense Pulsed Light) for Hair Reduction
|
N/A |