Hair Removal Clinical Trial
Official title:
Post Market Study Using The Elite IQ Device
Verified date | June 2024 |
Source | Cynosure, Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This is a prospective, open label, single-center clinical study to collect safety and efficacy data on the Elite iQ workstation. The intended use of the Elite iQ device used in this study is for the treatment of hair removal, pseudo folliculitis barbae, and benign vascular and pigmented lesions.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | March 2, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - A healthy male or female 18 years of age or older. - Understands and accepts obligation not to receive any other procedures on the treatment area through the length of the study. - Understands and accepts the obligation and is logistically able to be present for all visits. - Is willing to comply with all requirements of the study and sign the informed consent document. Exclusion Criteria: - The subject is hypersensitive to light in the near infrared wavelength region - The subject has sun-damaged skin (treatment contraindicated with Alex laser only) - The subject had recent unprotected sun exposure (for Alex laser within four weeks of treatment; for Nd:YAG laser within one week of treatment), including the use of tanning beds or tanning products, such as creams, lotions and sprays - The subject is taking medication which is known to increase sensitivity to sunlight - The subject has seizure disorders triggered by light - The subject is taking anticoagulants - The subject is taking or have taken oral isotretinoin, such as Accutane®, within the last six months - The subject is taking medication that alters the wound-healing response - The subject has a history of healing problems or history of keloid formation - The subject has an active localized or systemic infection, or an open wound in area being treated - The subject has a significant systemic illness or an illness localized in area being treated - The subject has a history of skin cancer or suspicious lesions - The subject has an autoimmune disease - The subject is receiving or have received gold therapy - The subject is currently enrolled in an investigational drug or device trial, or has received an investigational drug or been treated with an investigational device within in the area to be treated 6 months to entering this study. - The subject has any condition or is in a situation which in the investigators opinion may put the subject at significant risk, may confound study results or may interfere significantly with the subject's participation. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Scripps Clinic Carmel Valley | San Diego | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Cynosure, Inc. |
United States,
Gupta V, Sharma VK. Skin typing: Fitzpatrick grading and others. Clin Dermatol. 2019 Sep-Oct;37(5):430-436. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 17. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Blinded Evaluation of Pre-treatment Images vs. Follow up Images to Determine Which Image Was Taken Pre-treatment vs. at the Follow up. | Blind identification of pre-treatment images vs. 60 day follow up images. It is performed by independent reviewers. The outcome will be reported as a percentage of photographs identified correctly. | 60 day (+/- 30 days) post last treatment | |
Secondary | Principle Investigator Assessment Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (PGAIS) | Principle Investigator assessment using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (PGAIS) at the 60 day follow up visit. The GAIS scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 being "very much improved," 2 being "much improved," 3 being "improved," 4 being "no change," and 5 being "worse." This is the count of the number of subjects who the physician graded a 3 or higher. | 60 day (+/- 30 days) post last treatment | |
Secondary | Subject Satisfaction | Subject satisfaction rates at the 60 day follow up visit. The subject satisfaction scale ranges from 1 to 6, with 1 being extremely unsatisfied, 2 being dissatisfied, 3 being slightly unsatisfied, 4 being slightly satisfied, 5 being satisfied, and 6 being extremely satisfied. This is the count of the number of subjects who graded themselves a 4 or higher. | 60 day (+/- 30 days) post last treatment |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00366964 -
The Efficacy Of The Wavelight Mydon Laser for Hair Removal And Treatment of Leg Veins
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01578187 -
Hair2Go Label Comprehension and Usability Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01348789 -
Safety for Frequent Use Conditions of Hair Removal Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01348776 -
The Efficiency of the Hair2Go Device: A Prospective, Open, Label Study With Before-After Design
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01057134 -
Ultrasound Device for Hair Removal
|
||
Completed |
NCT01282866 -
Hair Count Reduction Verification Study With the LightSheer Duet HS Handpiece
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06179186 -
Hair Removal: Intense Pulsed Light Versus Diode Laser
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01529931 -
Long Term Efficiency of the Hair2Go Device
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01801202 -
Clinical Evaluation of LightSheer Duet 805nm HS Handpiece
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02912013 -
The Efficacy of the Me Mini Device for Hair Removal
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02318654 -
Ice Versus EMLA for Pain in Laser Hair Removal
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03438929 -
Evaluation of Diolaze XL Blended Mode for Hair Removal
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03945383 -
Clinical Investigation of Safety and Effectiveness of Emerald IPLdevice
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03921814 -
Sunstone IPL (Intense Pulsed Light) for Hair Reduction
|
N/A |