Low Versus Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

The role of laparoscopy in gynecological and gyne-oncological surgery has dramatically increased over the past decades. Although laparoscopic procedure has several advantages over open surgery such as reduced blood loss, faster recovery earlier return to normal activities and work, however, postoperative pain and some hemodynamic changes sometimes discomforts the patients, lessening quality of life at postoperative period [1-3]. In clinical practice the majority of laparoscopic procedures are performed using standard pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP, 12-15 mmHg) [1-3]. These noticeable adverse effects are associated with of creation of pneumoperitoneum with carbon dioxide (CO2) but it is requisite in all laparoscopic surgery for adequate visualization and operative manipulation. The incidence of pain after gynecologic laparoscopies has been reported to vary from 35% to 63% [4,5]. A randomized controlled trial has demonstrated that there may be more intense pain and greater analgesia requirements in the immediate postoperative period after laparoscopic surgery than after laparotomy [6]. The origin of pain after laparoscopy is multifactorial and complex. It can be differentiated into abdominal pain and shoulder pain [7]. The precise causes for such pain are still obscure. Abdominal pain may be attributed to stretching of the abdominal cavity, and peritoneal irritation due to entrapment of dissolved CO2 [1-7]. Intraperitoneal acidosis, mucosal ischemia and compression of the splanchnic nerve as a consequence of the pneumoperitoneum may also be relevant factors [8,9]. On the other hand, shoulder pain is related to phrenic nerve and diaphragm irrigation due to residual CO2 in the subdiaphragmatic space [7-9]. In addition to pain, CO2 insufflation and a concomitant steep head-down (Trendelenburg, TP) position in surgical procedure also cause an increase in intra-abdominal pressure, which unfavorably affect patients homeostasis, inducing a significant change in the respiratory and cardiovascular system, lessening perfusion in abdominal organs and blood flow in the inferior vena cava, and posing an increased risk of thrombotic disease [10,11]. Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP, 7-10 mmHg) is recommended to minimize the adverse side effects associated with SPP [12]. There are several reports on the safety of low CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressure (LPP) in gynecological laparoscopic procedures however their trials have some limitations due to the small sample size, performed in only short laparoscopic procedures, and inadequate to assess the surgical impression of visualization [13-16]. Thus, further studies are still required. Therefore, the purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to assess the effect of LPP versus SPP on metabolic response, postoperative pain scores, surgical field visualization.

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04947982
Study type	Interventional
Source	Erzincan Military Hospital
Contact
Status	Not yet recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	July 1, 2021
Completion date	July 30, 2022

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05071976` - A Study of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging With ICG During Reconstructive Gynecologic Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT04549090` - Ultrasound Guided Posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Gynecologic Surgery
Recruiting	`NCT05526534` - A RCT on the Preventive Effect of HFNC on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients With Gynecologic Neoplasms	N/A
Completed	`NCT03828981` - A Fast-track Versus Conventional Recovery Protocol in Laparoscopic Hysterctomy	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05910385` - TUbal LIgation Per Differents Endoscopic Routes and Sexuality (TULIPES)	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04392674` - Safety and Efficacy of Using the New Tissue Containment System During Laparoscopic Myomectomy Morcellation	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04423172` - Safety, Efficacy and Operability of Using the New Tissue Containment System During Laprascopic Hysterectomy	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05296928` - Postoperative Pain Score of Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgeries	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT03216772` - Safety and Efficacy of Using PK Morcellator With Pneumoliner Containment Hysterectomy	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03795766` - Nausea and Vomiting After Gynecologic Surgery
Recruiting	`NCT03085732` - The Effect of Intraabdominal Saline Irrigation in Abdominal Hysterectomies	N/A
Completed	`NCT04063085` - The Assessment of the Use of Anti-Adhesion Agents to Prevent Pelvic Postoperative Adhesions	N/A
Completed	`NCT03517228` - Pilot Trial of the Robotic Uterine Manipulator	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05308810` - Postoperative Kidney Functions in Geriatric Major Gynecologic-Oncologic Surgery
Withdrawn	`NCT02351440` - Effect of Preoperative Duloxetine on Quality of Recovery After Outpatient Laparoscopic Surgery	Phase 4

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.