Glioma Glioblastoma Multiforme Clinical Trial
— FUTURE-GBOfficial title:
FUTURE-GB Trial (Functional and Ultrasound-guided Resection of Glioblastoma) A 2-Stage Trial. A Learning Phase Evaluation of Participating Centres, Followed by a Randomised, Controlled Multicentre Phase III Trial.
NCT number | NCT05399524 |
Other study ID # | 14763 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | November 1, 2020 |
Est. completion date | November 2025 |
Functional and ultrasound-guided resection of glioblastoma: assessing the use of additional imaging during surgery to improve outcomes for patients with glioblastoma brain tumours
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 357 |
Est. completion date | November 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | October 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 70 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age 18-70 years - Neuro-oncology Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) decision that the imaging shows a primary GB tumour which is maximally resectable (attempted gross total resection of all enhancing tumour) - Patient is suitable for concomitant adjuvant radiotherapy and Temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy or adjuvant TMZ at the time of MDT decision - Able to receive 5-ALA - Willing and able to give informed consent - Able to complete trial questionnaires, this may be with support where English is not their first language. (Stage 2 only) - Able to provide a proxy who is willing to complete questionnaires as requested (Stage 2 only). Exclusion Criteria: - Midline/basal ganglia/cerebellum/brainstem GB - Multifocal GB - Recurrent GB - Suspected secondary GB - Contraindication to MRI |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United Kingdom | Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHSFT | Birmingham | |
United Kingdom | Royal Sussex County Hospital | Brighton | |
United Kingdom | Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHST | Bristol | |
United Kingdom | Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University NHSFT | Cambridge | |
United Kingdom | University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board | Cardiff | |
United Kingdom | University Hospital, Coventry | Coventry | |
United Kingdom | Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside | Dundee | |
United Kingdom | The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian | Edinburgh | |
United Kingdom | Hull Royal Infirmary | Hull | |
United Kingdom | Leeds General Infirmary | Leeds | |
United Kingdom | The Walton Centre | Liverpool | |
United Kingdom | Charing Cross Hospital/St Mary's, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust | London | |
United Kingdom | King's College Hospital | London | |
United Kingdom | Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust | London | |
United Kingdom | James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHSFT | Middlesbrough | |
United Kingdom | Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHSFT | Newcastle Upon Tyne | |
United Kingdom | Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHST | Nottingham | |
United Kingdom | The John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT | Oxford | |
United Kingdom | Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust | Plymouth | |
United Kingdom | Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHSFT | Preston | |
United Kingdom | Queen's Hospital, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHST | Romford | |
United Kingdom | Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | Sheffield | |
United Kingdom | Southampton General Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHSFT | Southampton | |
United Kingdom | Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHST | Stoke-on-Trent |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Oxford | Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) Programme, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust |
United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Tertiary Mechanistic Objectives (on a sub set of participants): assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of the anatomico-spatial location of DTI fibre tracts compared to Standard of Care | To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the anatomico-spatial location of DTI fibre tracts compared with intraoperative direct electrical stimulation/behavioural change without stimulation but related to adjacent white fibre tract in patients undergoing awake surgery, or motor evoked potential changes in patients undergoing surgery.
Measured by sensitivity and specificity calculation using pre and post-surgery MRI images |
6 weeks post-surgery | |
Other | Tertiary Mechanistic Objectives (on a sub set of participants): assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of iUS to identify the tumour boundary when compared with 5-ALA. | To assess the sensitivity and specificity of iUS* to identify the tumour boundary when compared with 5-ALA, navigated biopsies will be taken from tumour boundary tissue planned for resection.
Intra operative iUS* images and post-operative MRI scans and Intraoperative biopsy samples |
6 weeks post-surgery | |
Primary | Stage 1 Primary Outcome: to demonstrate the feasibility of using DTI and iUS in addition to standard of care for neurosurgery using a combination of qualitative and quantitative data to prove workflow capability at each site. | Sites are qualitatively assessed through a standardisation stage, providing feedback to enable learning and ensure the workflow is followed. Sites with satisfactory data will "progress" and pass into Stage 2.
The measures assessed in combination are: Operation length, in normal range for this surgery. Use of DTI neuronavigation & iUS to achieve maximal safe tumour resection without major neurological deficit, measured by getting clear, relevant images for the DTI & US scans, and accurate pre-operative tractography. Extent of tumour resection (cm³ remaining) on postoperative MRI scan. Surgical Complications/Serious Adverse Events-measured from recorded post-operative complications and a 6-month notes check to ensure patient safety. If the assessment panel is satisfied with the data after ~3 recruits, a site will progress into Stage 2 of the trial, the RCT. Data will be analysed for Stage 1 once all sites have progressed through into Stage 2 of the trial. |
Measured 6 weeks post-surgery | |
Primary | Stage 2 Primary Outcome: to assess whether additional imaging to standard of care changes Deterioration Free Survival (DFS) (Where deterioration relates to global health status only) | This is measured by a composite of:
Change in global health status domain of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire (Quality of Life Questionnaire Cancer) from baseline to final questionnaire completion. Questionnaires are administered at baseline, 6 weeks, then every 3 months until 24months. Progression Free Survival (PFS). This is measured by radiological tumour progression on imaging, which is taken 3-months post-op and 3-monthly thereafter. Overall Survival (OS) with an event defined as either deterioration, progression or death. |
Measured from baseline up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Stage 2: To assess if additional intraoperative imaging changes DFS where deterioration relates to physical and social functioning, and motor and communication dysfunction | This is measured using a combination of specific questions (physical functioning and social functioning) in the QLQ-C30 (Quality of Life Questionnaire Cancer) and BN20 questionnaire (Quality of Life Questionnaire Brain) (motor dysfunction and communication deficit questions), combined with the values of Progression Free Survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) taken from the primary outcome.
Questionnaires are administered at baseline, 6 weeks, then every 3 months until 24months. |
Measured from baseline up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Stage 2: To assess whether additional intraoperative imaging to standard of care changes time to deterioration | Defined similar to DFS with the exception that progression is excluded as an event (i.e. only deterioration or death are considered). There will be five time to deterioration outcomes, one for each of the domains utilised in the primary and secondary DFS outcomes, used in turn to define deterioration | Measured from baseline up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Stage 2: To assess whether additional intraoperative imaging to standard of care improves Overall Survival (OS) | OS (time from randomisation to death or trial closure) | To be recorded at 24 months | |
Secondary | Stage 2: To assess whether additional intraoperative imaging (DTI and iUS*) to standard of care (Neuronavigation and intraoperative 5-ALA) changes Progression Free Survival (PFS) | PFS (time from randomisation to radiological tumour progression on imaging, as agreed in local MDT
This involves using the post-operative MRI scan as a reference point and making comparisons will the ensuing MRI reports that are recieved 3 months post-surgery and 3 monthly thereafter until 24 months post-surgery. |
MRI at 6 months post-op., and then 3 monthly up to 24 months or an MRI performed outside protocol if patient is symptomatic | |
Secondary | Stage 2: To assess whether additional intraoperative imaging (DTI and iUS*) to standard of care (Neuronavigation and intraoperative 5-ALA) changes the extent of tumour resection | Extent of resection as percent of pre-operative tumour volume on postoperative contrast enhanced MRI | Measured 1 week post-surgery | |
Secondary | Stage 2: To assess whether additional intraoperative imaging (DTI and iUS*) to standard of care (Neuronavigation and intraoperative 5-ALA) changes the incidence of surgical complications | Number and type of surgical complications | Measured from surgery up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Stage 2: To assess whether additional intraoperative imaging (DTI and iUS*) to standard of care (Neuronavigation and intraoperative 5-ALA) changes the number of patients eligible for adjuvant treatment following surgery | Number of patients eligible for adjuvant treatment | Measured 3 months post surgery | |
Secondary | Stage 2: To assess whether additional intraoperative imaging (DTI and iUS*) to standard of care (Neuronavigation and intraoperative 5-ALA) changes functional outcome postoperatively | Measured by any change in the functional performance assessment which consistes of a combination of:
The WHO (World Health Organisation) performance status A 5-minute telephone mini-MoCA (The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Montreal Version) Barthel Index MRC (Medical Research Council) grading of power in all 4 limbs Assessments are made at baseline, at hospital discharge, 6 weeks post-op, 3 months post-op, then 3 monthly thereafter until 24 months. |
Measured from baseline up to 24 months | |
Secondary | Stage 2: Assess the correlation of proxy to participant classification assessment of quality of life | Assessed using comparisons between the patient and proxy responses to the Quality of Life questionnaires administered. Specifically comparisons between the answers to questions 29 and 30 of the QLQ-C30. | Measured from baseline up to 24 months. Proxy will not complete questionnaires when participant stops completing them. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03990285 -
[18F]Fluciclovine in Post-treatment Glioblastoma ( Axumin )
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05896449 -
Predictive Values of Preoperative [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in Patients With Suspected Brain Tumours of Glial Origin
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05086497 -
WBSI Guided Personalized Delivery of TTFields
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06348693 -
Development of Therapeutic Approaches Modulating Molecular Targets Implicated on Cancer Stem Cell-related Aggressiveness
|