Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

STUDY QUESTION: Does the depth of injection of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin in the glabellar complex affect efficacy of the BoTN for the improvement of glabellar frown lines? STUDY AIM - Primary objective: Compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm for the improvement of glabellar lines - Secondary objective: Determine any adverse effects of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm RATIONALE FOR THE PROJECT: Although the use of BoTN for treatment of glabellar lines has long been established as safe and effective, the optimal depth of injection has not been established. Our project hopes to establish the optimal depth of injection for onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin for maximal improvement of glabellar lines with minimal adverse effects


Clinical Trial Description

STUDY AIM, BACKGROUND, AND DESIGN ABSTRACT Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is a safe and effective treatment for numerous conditions in neurology, ophthalmology, dermatology, gastroenterology, psychiatry, and urology. In dermatology, BoNT is commonly used for treatment of facial rhytides and is by far the most frequently performed cosmetic procedure in recent years. In 2002, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of BoNT for the treatment of glabellar lines. Although, BoNT has shown excellent safety profile for the treatment of glabellar lines, injection methods vary widely between practitioners and no standardized method for the depth of injection has been established. The most common treatment area is the glabellar complex, which consists of bilateral corrugator supercilii, depressor supercilii, procerus, and the orbital portion of the orbicularis oculi. With increasing age and repetitive contraction of the glabellar complex, particularly the bilateral corrugator supercilii and procerus, the formation of prominent dynamic glabellar lines and static, etched-in glabellar lines can form and lead to the appearance a more severe frown. In a study using ultrasonographic imaging and the three-dimensional scanning Cho et al. determined that the procerus was located at a depth of 3.8 ± 0.7 mm at the glabella and 2.7 ± 0.6 mm at the sellion while the intercanthal vein was located 3.0 ± 0.6 mm below the skin's surface superior to the sellion. Careful consideration of depth of injection and facial anatomy must be taken to avoid bruising and intravascular injection of BoTN. Additionally, in a cadaveric study looking at depth of corrugator supercilii of 32 Korean hemifaces using 3D scanning, Lee et al. found that the corrugator supercilii muscle rested at a depth of 5.7 +/-1.4 mm medially and 6.6 +/-1.4mm laterally and recommended BoTN injections at the depth of 4mm. However, no in vivo studies have been performed to validate this as the optimal depth of injection. In a split face study evaluating the depth of botulinum injection into the corrugator supercilii muscle no difference in brow height between injecting periosteally versus in superficial dermis. The investigators previously studied the ability of botulinum toxin to diffuse in crow's feet through laser pores into the target muscle. (8) In our randomized study, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy of BoTN for the treatment of glabellar lines when injected at a depth of 2mm (superficial dermis) versus 4mm (intramuscularly). The investigators hypothesize that no difference exists between the two depths as the 150kD botulinum toxin molecules can easily diffuse to the target at the muscle. If this is validated, patients can be treated with more superficial depths, which will result in less pain and bruising. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Depth of injection of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin in the glabellar complex does not affect efficacy of the BoTN for the improvement of glabellar lines. STUDY AIM - Primary objective: Compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm for the improvement of glabellar lines - Secondary objective: Determine any adverse effects of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm RATIONALE FOR THE PROJECT: Although the use of BoTN for treatment of glabellar lines has long been established as safe and effective, the optimal depth of injection has not been established. Our project hopes to establish the optimal depth of injection for onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin for maximal improvement of glabellar lines with minimal adverse effects. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05766683
Study type Interventional
Source Henry Ford Health System
Contact
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase Phase 1
Start date March 14, 2023
Completion date December 2024

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02236312 - Safety and Efficacy Study of Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT05565950 - AI-09 In Subjects With Glabellar Lines, GL-101 Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT00430963 - IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05083286 - Duration of Botox Using OLD Versus COLD for Treatment of Glabellar Lines Early Phase 1
Completed NCT03687736 - Subject Satisfaction With AbobutulinumtoxinA Treatment Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT04281745 - Long-term Open-label Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines With CORETOX® Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT05623410 - Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of ATGC-110 (Botulinum Toxin) With Xeomin® for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Frown Lines Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT03440671 - The Safety and Efficacy Study of Hutox Versus Botox® in Subject With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines Phase 3
Completed NCT03736928 - Safety and Efficacy of AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines Phase 2
Completed NCT01808742 - Study Evaluating the Treatment of Forehead and/or Glabellar Lines With the CRYO-TOUCH III Device N/A
Completed NCT00777803 - NT 201 (Xeomin®/Bocouture®) in Comparison With Clostridium Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines Phase 3
Completed NCT00430586 - Finding of Optimal Dose for NT 201 in the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines Phase 2
Completed NCT04281095 - A Comparative Study of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Frown Lines Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT05146999 - Assess Aesthetic Improvement and Onset of QM1114-DP in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines Phase 3
Completed NCT02428608 - Safety Study of DWP-450 (Botulinum Toxin, Type a) to Treat Glabellar Lines - EV-006 Phase 2
Completed NCT04143815 - Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MBA-P01 in Treatment of Glabellar Lines Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT05305768 - Xeomin Treatment of Glabellar Lines Using OLD Versus COLD Early Phase 1
Completed NCT05364580 - The Efficacy and Safety Study of Protoxin Versus Botox® in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines Phase 3
Completed NCT05320393 - Study to Demonstrate Safety and Duration of Effect of 40 Units of PrabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs to Treat Glabellar Lines Phase 2
Completed NCT02677805 - Botulinum Toxin Treatment of Glabellar Lines: Efficacy and Safety Study II Phase 3