Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01333397
Other study ID # Y-52-52120-146
Secondary ID 2010-019085-82
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date March 2011
Est. completion date September 2011

Study information

Verified date September 2022
Source Ipsen
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary objective is to assess the dose response versus placebo of a single treatment of Dysport RU (Dysport RU, Ready to Use, for injection), for the improvement in appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines at maximum frown.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 176
Est. completion date September 2011
Est. primary completion date September 2011
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 30 Years to 60 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Female between 30 - 60 years of age - Moderate to severe vertical glabellar lines at maximum frown at baseline Exclusion Criteria: - Silicone injections into the upper face - Any prior treatment with fillers (e.g. collagen-type implants) skin abrasions or photorejuvenation within the previous 12 months - Any planned facial cosmetic surgery during the study period - A history of ablative skin resurfacing of the area to be treated during the study.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Biological:
Botulinum toxin type A
I.M. (in the muscle) injection on day 1 (single treatment cycle)
Botulinum toxin type A
I.M. on day 1 (single treatment cycle)
Drug:
Placebo
I.M. on day 1 (single treatment cycle)

Locations

Country Name City State
France Private practice Bordeaux
France Private practice Cannes
France Private practice Juan Les Pins
France Private practice Paris
Germany Charité hospital Berlin
Germany Private clinic Dresden
Germany Private clinic Munich
Germany Private clinic Starnberg

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Ipsen

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

France,  Germany, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Number of Subjects Reporting at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Event During the Study Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Up to Day 113 (±3 days)
Primary Percentage of Subjects as Responders in the ILA (Using Validated 4-point Photographic Scale) and the SSA of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Frown Investigator's live assessment (ILA), subject's self assessment (SSA), Next Generation (NG)
4-point photographic scale: Investigator's live assessment: None - 0; Mild - 1; Moderate - 2; Severe - 3;
4-point photographic scale: Subject's Self assessment: No wrinkles - 0; Mild wrinkles - 1; Moderate wrinkles - 2; Severe wrinkles - 3;
A responder at maximum frown was defined as a subject having a severity grade of none or mild at maximum frown on Day 29 and a severity grade of moderate or severe at maximum frown at Visit 2.
Day 29
Secondary Percentage of Subjects as Assessed as Responders, by Both Investigator's Live Assessment and the Subject's Self-assessment at Maximum Frown. A responder at maximum frown was defined as a subject having a severity grade of none or mild at maximum frown on the visit day and a severity grade of moderate or severe at maximum frown at Visit 2. Day 29
Secondary Percentage of Subjects as Responders at Maximum Frown as Measured by the Investigator's Live Assessment. Days 8, 15, 57, 85 and 113
Secondary Percentage of Subjects as Responders at Maximum Frown as Measured by the Subject's Self-assessment. Days 8, 15, 57, 85 and 113
Secondary Percentage of Subjects Assessed as Responders, by Both the Investigator's Live Assessment and the Subject's Self-assessment at Maximum Frown. Days 8, 15, 57, 85 and 113
Secondary Percentage of Subjects as Responders at Rest as Measured by the Investigator's Live Assessment. A responder at rest was defined as a subject having a severity grade of none or mild at rest on the visit day and a severity grade of moderate or severe at rest at Visit 2. Days 8, 15, 29, 57, 85 and 113
Secondary Percentage of Subjects as Responders at Maximum Frown on Day 29 Who Remain Responders A responder at maximum frown was defined as a subject having a severity grade of none or mild at maximum frown on the visit day and a severity grade of moderate or severe at maximum frown at Visit 2. Day 113
Secondary Percentage of Subjects With a Reduction of Two or More Grades in the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Frown as Measured by the Investigator's Live Assessment A reduction of two or more grades in the severity of glabellar lines at maximum frown was a change from Visit 2 severity of glabellar lines from severe to mild/none or from Visit 2 severity of moderate to none after treatment as measured by the Investigator's live assessment Days 8, 15, 29, 57, 85 and 113
Secondary Percentage of Subjects With a Reduction of Two or More Grades in the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Rest as Measured by the Investigator's Live Assessment A reduction of two or more grades in the severity of glabellar lines at rest was a change from Visit 2 severity of glabellar lines from severe to mild or from Visit 2 severity of moderate to none after treatment as measured by the Investigator's live assessment. Days 8, 15, 29, 57, 85 and 113
Secondary Percentage of Subjects With a Reduction of Two or More Grades in the Severity of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Frown as Measured by the Subject's Self-assessment A reduction of two or more grades in the severity of glabellar lines at maximum frown was a change from Visit 2 severity of glabellar lines from severe to mild/no wrinkles or from Visit 2 severity of moderate to no wrinkles after treatment as measured by the subjects self assessment. Days 8, 15, 29, 57, 85 and 113
Secondary Percentage of Subjects as Responders, as Measured by the Investigator's Live Assessment at Maximum Frown (Comparison With Dysport 50 U) Days 8, 15, 29, 57, 85 and 113
Secondary Percentage of Subjects as Responders, as Measured by the Subject's Self Assessment at Maximum Frown (Comparison With Dysport 50 U) Days 8, 15, 29, 57, 85 and 113
Secondary Percentage of Subjects as Responders, as Measured by the Investigator's Live Assessment at Rest (Comparison With Dysport 50 U) Days 8, 15, 29, 57, 85 and 113
Secondary Percentage of Subjects as Responders at Day 29 by the Investigator's Live Assessment and by Subject's Self Assessment of Glabellar Lines at Maximum Frown (Assay Sensitivity) Day 29
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT02236312 - Safety and Efficacy Study of Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT05565950 - AI-09 In Subjects With Glabellar Lines, GL-101 Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT00430963 - IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05083286 - Duration of Botox Using OLD Versus COLD for Treatment of Glabellar Lines Early Phase 1
Completed NCT03687736 - Subject Satisfaction With AbobutulinumtoxinA Treatment Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT04281745 - Long-term Open-label Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines With CORETOX® Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT05623410 - Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of ATGC-110 (Botulinum Toxin) With Xeomin® for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Frown Lines Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT03440671 - The Safety and Efficacy Study of Hutox Versus Botox® in Subject With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines Phase 3
Completed NCT03736928 - Safety and Efficacy of AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines Phase 2
Completed NCT01808742 - Study Evaluating the Treatment of Forehead and/or Glabellar Lines With the CRYO-TOUCH III Device N/A
Completed NCT00777803 - NT 201 (Xeomin®/Bocouture®) in Comparison With Clostridium Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines Phase 3
Completed NCT00430586 - Finding of Optimal Dose for NT 201 in the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines Phase 2
Completed NCT04281095 - A Comparative Study of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Frown Lines Phase 1/Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT05146999 - Assess Aesthetic Improvement and Onset of QM1114-DP in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT06411002 - Phase 2a Study of DaxibotulinumtoxinA-lanm for Injection in Dynamic Forehead Lines and Glabellar Lines Phase 2
Completed NCT02428608 - Safety Study of DWP-450 (Botulinum Toxin, Type a) to Treat Glabellar Lines - EV-006 Phase 2
Completed NCT04143815 - Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MBA-P01 in Treatment of Glabellar Lines Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT05305768 - Xeomin Treatment of Glabellar Lines Using OLD Versus COLD Early Phase 1
Completed NCT05364580 - The Efficacy and Safety Study of Protoxin Versus Botox® in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines Phase 3
Completed NCT05320393 - Study to Demonstrate Safety and Duration of Effect of 40 Units of PrabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs to Treat Glabellar Lines Phase 2