View clinical trials related to Glabellar Frown Lines.
Filter by:This is a Phase 2a open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the effects of DaxibotulinumtoxinA-lanm (DAXI) for Injection on the treatment of dynamic forehead lines (FHL) and glabellar lines (GL). Approximately 40 subjects (18 years of age and above) with moderate to severe GL and FHL (all assessed at maximum contraction) will be screened for eligibility with the goal of enrolling and treating 30 subjects to receive DAXI for injection after providing informed consent. The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of the combined treatment of two upper facial regions with DAXI for injection.
This clinical trial is an extended clinical trial for test subjects who participated in the phase 3 clinical trial of PT_BTA_P3_21 (clinical trial plan number) and completed follow-up observation up to 16 weeks after administration of clinical trial drugs, and evaluates the effectiveness and safety of repeated administration of protoxin in those with moderate or severe brow wrinkles.
The current literature suggests that zinc supplementation may increase the duration of botulinum toxin; however, each study had their limitations. Further, no one has studied the effect of zinc supplementation for botulinum toxin treatment of the forehead. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of zinc supplementation on frontalis muscle denervation by objectively assessing the degree of forehead rhytids and movement of the eyebrows.
STUDY QUESTION: Does the depth of injection of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin in the glabellar complex affect efficacy of the BoTN for the improvement of glabellar frown lines? STUDY AIM - Primary objective: Compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm for the improvement of glabellar lines - Secondary objective: Determine any adverse effects of onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin injected at the depth of 2mm vs 4mm RATIONALE FOR THE PROJECT: Although the use of BoTN for treatment of glabellar lines has long been established as safe and effective, the optimal depth of injection has not been established. Our project hopes to establish the optimal depth of injection for onabotulinumtoxinA neurotoxin for maximal improvement of glabellar lines with minimal adverse effects
Efficacy and safety of the investigational product, ATGC-110, was evaluated in comparison with Xeomin for a total of 16 weeks after the administration in treatment of glabellar frown lines.
AI-09 In Subjects with Glabellar Lines
The aim of this study was to compare between the conventional palpation method of botulinum toxin type A injection and the electromyography-guided method using clinical parameters and electromyography analysis.
Non-interventional PASS of NUCEIVA for the treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines to provide additional characterisation of the long-term safety of NUCEIVA in the real-world clinical practice setting.
This study will be conducted in Phase Ⅲ clinical trials. In Phase Ⅲ, subjects with moderate to severe glabellar lines are enrolled and those who are judged to be eligible for this study will be injected with the "PROTOXIN" at a total of 20U(4U/0.1mL each) in five sites of the glabellar lines. The investigational product is administered once, maintaining double-blind for a total of 16 weeks of observation. Thereafter, efficacy and safety are assessed by comparing with BOTOX® after regular visits conducted at 4,8,12 and 16 weeks.
This study is intended to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of MBA-P01 in treatment of glabellar lines.