Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this randomized clinical study is to assess the root coverage outcomes and patient morbidity following the treatment of single maxillary recession-type defects using a coronally advanced flap (CAF) combined with a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) harvested from the maxillary tuberosity (MT) versus lateral palate (LP). The secondary objective is to evaluate the histological characteristics of graft compositions harvested from the different regions (MT versus LP). Therefore, the following questions related to the study are raised: - Do SCTGs harvested from MT (tSCTG) and LP (pSCTG) exhibit similar root coverage outcomes in the treatment of single maxillary recession-type defects using CAF? - What are the histological characteristics of tSCTG and pSCTG? A total of 30 patients who have been referred to the Gazi University Department of Periodontology will be randomly assigned to receive tSCTG or pSCTG in combination with CAF. Clinical measurements will be recorded at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgeries. Immediately after interventions; a questionnaire evaluating post-operative pain, discomfort, sensitivity, and bleeding will be given to the patients. The amount of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs used will be recorded at 1, 2, 3, 7, 14 and 28 days after surgery. Descriptive morphologic analysis of the grafts will be assessed in terms of the presence of inflammatory cells, connective tissue cellularity, vascularization, adipose tissue, and collagen structure.


Clinical Trial Description

The treatment of gingival recessions using the coronally advanced flap (CAF) in combination with palatal subepithelial connective tissue graft (pSCTG) is highly predictable and frequently accepted in periodontal plastic-aesthetic surgeries. However, due to its limitations and disadvantages, clinicians often use grafts harvested from different autogenous areas or multiple non-autogenous materials as an alternative. CAF combined with pSCTG is considered the gold standard for root coverage procedures. However, factors such as the density of vascular structures, a close approximation to nerves, and postoperative morbidity remain concerning for clinicians using palatal connective tissue grafts. Because of this, researchers have sought different techniques for palatal connective tissue harvesting and/or different autogenous donor areas. The maxillary tuberosity region has been found to have a denser lamina propria and is farther from nerve/vascular bundles. Despite differences in harvesting techniques, literature has presented similar root coverage outcomes, lesser post-operative bleeding, and pain for SCTGs harvested from the maxillary tuberosity (tSCTG) compared to pSCTG groups. Decreased post-operative pain after tSCTG harvesting could be explained by higher amounts of connective tissue present in the donor area after harvesting and avoiding trauma created by food consumption and tongue movements in the region. Clinical data also showed an increased amount of keratinized tissue and its stability after augmentation, favoring tSCTG. Considering structural differences, literature has shown that tSCTG provides more thickness, a more abundant lamina propria, and denser collagen compared to pSCTG. However, due to the size of the harvested tSCTG not being as abundant as pSCTG, it can be assumed that the augmented areas were limited to multiple recessions or defects. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT06404762
Study type Interventional
Source Gazi University
Contact Assoc Prof Dr, PhD
Phone +905069966074
Email silaisler@gazi.edu.tr
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date July 1, 2023
Completion date February 1, 2025

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Enrolling by invitation NCT05591326 - The Effect of Using Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin on Root Surface Closure in Patients With Gingival Recession. N/A
Recruiting NCT06000228 - Effect of Vestibular Depth on Predictability of Miller Class III/ RT2 Gingival Recession Coverage N/A
Recruiting NCT05563428 - Free Gingival Graft Versus Connective Tissue Graft N/A
Completed NCT04854902 - Cyanoacrylate Use in Free Gingival Graft N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05682274 - Effect of Restoration Margin Level in the Treatment of Gingival Recession Associated With Non-carious Cervical Lesion N/A
Completed NCT05822323 - Effect of Botulinum Toxin-A on Free Gingival Graft N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04729569 - Gingival Response and Marginal Adaptation of Zirconia Crowns With Two Subgingival Margin Designs N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06228534 - Root Coverage With Tunneling Technique With Connective Tissue Versus Coronal Advancement Flap Technique. N/A
Completed NCT06197893 - Modified Sling and Conventional Suture Techniques in Free Gingival Graft Operations N/A
Recruiting NCT05850065 - Assessment of Gingival Health Following Rubber-Dam Isolation N/A
Completed NCT04718545 - Effectiveness of Modified-free Gingival Graft for Treatment of Localized Gingival Recession Defects N/A
Recruiting NCT05990049 - Hyaluronic Acid and Free Gingival Graft Healing Phase 3
Completed NCT03425695 - Free Gingival Graft Adjunct With Low Level Laser Therapy N/A
Completed NCT06373783 - Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Connective Tissue Grafts Obtained With Two Different Methods in Root Coverage N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06432439 - Impact of Microneedling on Coverage of RT1 Gingival Recession in Thin Phenotype. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06030947 - Effectiveness of Meshed Connective Tissue Graft for Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recession Defects N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06065774 - Comparing Two Different Tunneling Technique for Gingival Recession Treatment Using Two Different Matertial N/A
Completed NCT04198376 - The Laterally Closed Tunnel Versus Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel for Mandibular Anterior Gingival Recession Defects N/A
Completed NCT03200392 - Er,Cr:YSGG Laser For Recipient Bed Bio-modification And Connective Tissue Harvesting in Treatment of Gingival Recession N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06388447 - Reconstruction of Deficient Interdental Papilla Using Stem Cells vs Physiological Saline Phase 4