Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02987231
Other study ID # UEPJMF 5
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 2016
Est. completion date November 2017

Study information

Verified date August 2019
Source Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate clinically and through the concentration of inflammatory markers, the results of 6 months of electrical stimulation associated with coronally advanced flap for treatment of gingival recession.


Description:

This is a prospective, parallel and controlled clinical trial. The population evaluated in the study was selected at Institute of Science and Technology (ICT), São José dos Campos, College of Dentistry.

Sixty patients presenting gingival recession will be divided in 2 groups:

- CAF group: coronally advanced flap for root coverage and sham electrical stimulation

- CAF+ES group: coronally advanced flap for root coverage plus electrical stimulation.

All surgical procedures were performed by a single operator (MPS). The gingival recession defects were randomly treated by either the trapezoidal-type of coronally advanced flap plus connective tissue graft (CAF+CTG). In brief description, CAF treatment was performed by starting with two divergent releasing incisions lateral to the recessed area. A sulcular incision was made to unite the releasing incisions and the flap was raised beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ) in split-full-split thickness. The connective tissue graft was removed from the palate and sutured in position. Sling sutures were placed to stabilize the flap in a coronal position 2 mm above the cement-enamel junction (CEJ), followed by interrupted sutures to close the releasing incisions.

For electrical stimulation, a unit consisting of a signal generator (WaveFactoryCo., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), a power supply (KikusuiElectronicsCo., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and circuit board will be used. Conductive electrodes for electrical current application will be applied to the vestibular gingival surface on each side of the flap, at a distance of 3 mm from the relaxing incisions and an alternating current of 100 microamperes (μA) at 9 kilohertz (kHz), will be distributed in order to traverse the operated area. A single application of electrical stimulation will be given for 120 seconds, once a day for a week. The electric current will have its visualization optimized through an oscilloscope. Patients randomized to the Control Group (SHAM) will receive the simulation of the electrical stimulation (ES) process.

Clinical, esthetics, and comfort of patients parameters were assessed at 45 days, 2, 3 and 6 months after the procedure.

Quantitative data were recorded as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and normality was tested using Shapiro-Wilk tests. The probing depth (PD), relative gingival recession (RGR), clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue thickness (KTT), keratinized tissue width (KTW), and dentin hypersensitivity (DH) values were examined by two-way repeated measures ANOVA to evaluate the differences within and between groups, followed by a Tukey test for multiple comparisons when the Shapiro-Wilk p value was ≥ 0.05. Those presenting Shapiro-Wilk p values < 0.05 were analyzed using a Friedman test (for intragroup comparisons) and Mann-Whitney tests (for intergroup comparisons). Patients' esthetics and discomfort measures using visual analog scale (VAS) were analyzed by T-tests. The frequency of complete root coverage was compared using χ2 tests. Intergroup root coverage esthetic score (RES) comparisons were performed with a T-test. A significance level of 0.05 was adopted.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date November 2017
Est. primary completion date September 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients presenting Miller class I or II gingival recession in the maxillary canines or premolars

- Visible cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) with pulp vitality;

- Patients presenting no signs of active periodontal disease and full-mouth plaque and bleeding score =20%;

- Patients older than 18 years old; probing depth ?3 mm in the included teeth;

- Patients who agreed to participate and signed an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients presenting systemic problems that would contraindicate the surgical procedure;

- Patients taking medications known to interfere with the wound healing process or that contraindicate the surgical procedure;

- Smokers or pregnant women;

- Patients who underwent periodontal surgery in the area of interest;

- Patients with orthodontic therapy in progress.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
CAF
Periodontal plastic surgery for root coverage by the trapezoidal flap
Device:
ES
Local electric stimulation for 120 seconds, once a day for a week
SHAM
Simulation of electric stimulation protocol. In Sham stimulation non current will be applied

Locations

Country Name City State
Brazil Felipe Lucas da Silva Neves Sao Jose dos Campos São Paulo

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Brazil, 

References & Publications (2)

de Sanctis M, Zucchelli G. Coronally advanced flap: a modified surgical approach for isolated recession-type defects: three-year results. J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Mar;34(3):262-8. — View Citation

Tomofuji T, Ekuni D, Azuma T, Irie K, Endo Y, Kasuyama K, Nagayama M, Morita M. Effects of electrical stimulation on periodontal tissue remodeling in rats. J Periodontal Res. 2013 Apr;48(2):177-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2012.01518.x. Epub 2012 Aug 14. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Percentage of Defect Coverage Percentage mean (%) of root surface covered by the surgical treatment, measured through a periodontal probe. 6 months
Secondary Root Coverage Esthetic Score The Root Coverage Esthetic Scale (RES; Cairo et al. 2009) was performed by two blinded and independent examiners (CFA and IFM) at the 6-month post-operative assessment. This score evaluates five variables: level of the gingival margin, marginal tissue contour, soft tissue texture, mucogingival junction alignment, and gingival color. Because complete root coverage was the primary treatment goal, and the other variables were considered secondary, the value assigned for root coverage was 60% of the total score, whereas 40% was assigned to the other four variables. With regard to the assessment of the final position of the gingival margin, 3 points were given for partial root coverage, and 6 points were given for complete root coverage; 0 points were assigned when the final position of the gingival margin was equal or apical to the previous recession. One point was assigned for each of the other four variables. The final score ranged from 0-10, higher values were considered better. 6 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06409468 - NovoMatrix in Gingival Recession Coverage: Case Series N/A
Recruiting NCT05370456 - Adjunctive Use of Hyaluronic Acid in Multiple Coronally Advanced Flap N/A
Completed NCT03207984 - Comparison Between Connective Graft and Xenogeneic Matrix, in Patients With Multiple Gingival Recessions N/A
Recruiting NCT03619096 - Two Different Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions With Porcine Collagen Matrix N/A
Withdrawn NCT03954028 - The Healing of Soft Tissue Augmentation by Acellular Dermal Matrix and Autogenous Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft N/A
Completed NCT03043638 - Efficiency of PRP on Acellular Dermal Matrix Application in the Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recessions N/A
Recruiting NCT03037320 - Comparison of Coronally Advanced Flap and Semilunar Incision Vestibular Technique for Multiple Gingival Recessions in Maxillary Teeth - A Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT03883438 - Cor Adv Flap Plus Ac Derm Matrix in Thin Phenotype Multiple Recessions N/A
Recruiting NCT03207971 - ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL PARAMETERS AND LASER DOPPLER FLOWMETRY FOR THE TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE GENGIVAL RECESSIONS WITH TWO TYPES OF SUBEPITELIAL CONNECTIVE GRAFT: RANDOMIZED CLINICAL STUDY N/A
Recruiting NCT05693753 - Xenogenic Collagen Matrix for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions N/A
Completed NCT04093674 - Clinical, Patient-centered Outcomes and Laser Doppler Flowmetry Using Two Types of SCTG N/A
Completed NCT03462368 - Evaluation of Root Coverage by Connective Graft and Different Root Conditioning Adjunctive Therapies N/A