Generalized Vitiligo Clinical Trial
Official title:
Bimatoprost 0.03% Solution, NB-UVB and Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser in Treatment of Generalized Vitiligo
Vitiligo is a chronic disorder of pigmentation characterized by the development of white
macules on the skin due to loss of epidermal melanocytes. It affects approximately 0.5%-2% of
general population world-wide, without predilection for sex or race.Vitiligo can be
classified into segmental or non-segmental. Non-segmental or generalized vitiligo is the most
common clinical presentation and often involves the face and acral regions.
Multiple monotherapy modalities are established to treat vitiligo but the response is
variable, unsatisfactory, and requiring a prolonged course. This problem is exaggerated by
the multifactorial and polygenic nature of the pathomechanism of the disease. These facts
pave the way to combination therapy that showed better and safe repigmentation response than
monotherapy.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | December 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 12 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients older than 12. 2. Patients with non-segmental vitiligo. 3. Lesions stable for at least one year. 4. Patients who were unresponsive to medical treatment or photo therapy for at least 3 months. 5. No sex or site predilection. 6. Bilateral and symmetrical lesions with maximum size of 10×10 cm. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with active infection. 2. Patients with sensitivity to bimatoprost or photosensitivity. 3. Patients with history or active skin cancer. 4. Pregnant or lactating females. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Assiut University |
Abdelghani R, Ahmed NA, Darwish HM. Combined treatment with fractional carbon dioxide laser, autologous platelet-rich plasma, and narrow band ultraviolet B for vitiligo in different body sites: A prospective, randomized comparative trial. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Aug 20. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12397. [Epub ahead of print] — View Citation
Alikhan A, Felsten LM, Daly M, Petronic-Rosic V. Vitiligo: a comprehensive overview Part I. Introduction, epidemiology, quality of life, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, associations, histopathology, etiology, and work-up. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Sep;65(3):473-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.061. Review. — View Citation
Bagherani N, Smoller BR. Efficacy of bimatoprost in the treatment of non-facial vitiligo. Dermatol Ther. 2017 Mar;30(2). doi: 10.1111/dth.12409. Epub 2016 Aug 23. — View Citation
Ezzedine K, Eleftheriadou V, Whitton M, van Geel N. Vitiligo. Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):74-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60763-7. Epub 2015 Jan 15. Review. — View Citation
Kim HJ, Hong ES, Cho SH, Lee JD, Kim HS. Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser as an "Add-on" Treatment for Vitiligo: A Meta-analysis with Systematic Review. Acta Derm Venereol. 2018 Feb 7;98(2):180-184. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2836. — View Citation
Lee D, Mantravadi AV, Myers JS. Patient considerations in ocular hypertension: role of bimatoprost ophthalmic solution. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul 10;11:1273-1280. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S118689. eCollection 2017. Review. — View Citation
Omi T, Numano K. The Role of the CO2 Laser and Fractional CO2 Laser in Dermatology. Laser Ther. 2014 Mar 27;23(1):49-60. doi: 10.5978/islsm.14-RE-01. Review. — View Citation
Salah Eldin MM, Sami NA, Aly DG, Hanafy NS. Comparison Between (311-312 nm) Narrow Band Ultraviolet-B Phototherapy and (308 nm) Monochromatic Excimer Light Phototherapy in Treatment of Vitiligo: A Histopathological Study. J Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Summer;8(3):123-127. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2017.22. Epub 2017 Jun 27. — View Citation
Wong L, Vasconez HC. Patient satisfaction after Nd:YAG laser-assisted lipolysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2011 May;66(5):561-3. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31820b3d1e. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Repigmentation of skin lesions | Patients will be followed up by two blind dermatologists after 3 months to detect: The percent of repigmentation: that will be subjectively rated with a previously reported scoring system: < 25% repigmentation (poor). 25-50% repigmentation (fair). 50-75% repigmentation (good). -> 75% repigmentation (excellent). |
3 months | |
Primary | Frequency and types of side effects | Frequency and types of side effects. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Vitiligo area scoring index score | Vitiligo area scoring index score percent change will be calculated by subtracting the pre- procedure vitiligo area scoring index score from the post-procedure vitiligo area scoring index score and dividing by the pre-procedure vitiligo area scoring index score. | 3 months | |
Secondary | Patient satisfaction | The patient overall satisfaction will be assessed after 6 months according to Wong Overall satisfaction: dissatisfied neutral somewhat satisfied moderately satisfied very satisfied |
6 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Terminated |
NCT05238077 -
Comparing the Efficacy of Visible Light-Ultraviolet A1 Light Versus Narrowband-Ultraviolet B on Generalized Vitiligo
|
N/A |