Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05605327 |
Other study ID # |
s65286 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
November 1, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
October 1, 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
October 2022 |
Source |
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven |
Contact |
Michiel Bronswijk, MD |
Phone |
+3215505159 |
Email |
mjh.bronswijk[@]gmail.com |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a common complication of various types of malignancy
arising from the pancreas, bile ducts, retroperitoneum and distal stomach. As these tumours
grow they may invade or compress the distal stomach or gastric outlet causing patients to
develop the classical manifestations of GOO including vomiting, weight loss, electrolyte
disturbances loss of quality of life as well as a reduced life expectancy. Until recently
these patients were managed using either endoscopic stenting or surgery. Laparoscopic
gastrojejunostomy (L-GJ) has been regarded as the golden standard in the management of GOO.
However surgery is invasive and may lead to peri-operative complications and longer
hospitalization which further greatly impacts on the quality of life of these patients in
which survival is already greatly impaired by their oncological problem. Recently it has been
shown that a special stent can be utilized to circumvent the tumour obstruction without the
need for surgery. This technique utilizes endoscopic ultrasound to connect the stomach to the
jejunum at a site distal to the tumour obstruction. This techniques is minimally invasive
compared to surgery. In a large retrospective propensity matched study we recently compared
endoscopic ultrasound placement of an AXIOS stent to laparoscopic surgery and could show that
the EUS-guided approach led to less complications (2.6 vs 26%) and shorter hospital stay
compared to surgery.1 Our study and that of other groups, has led the European Society of
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) to recommend that EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) can
be considered for patients with malignant GOO as an alternative for surgery and endoscopic
stenting, acknowledging that further randomized controlled trials comparing the EUS-GJ
approach to surgery, are necessary.2 Based on the above clinical need we set out to design a
multicentre international trial with the main aim of comparing EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy
to laparoscopic gastroenterostomy. The planned study has two components: 1. Randomized study
(EATING RCT)- patients that meet the strict inclusion criteria for the (EATING-RCT) will be
randomized to either EUS-GJ or L-GJ. 2. Patients in whom inclusion criteria for the RCT are
not met, will be invited to participate in the observational arm of the study (EATING-C)
comparing EUS-GJ, enteral stenting and surgical gastrojenostomy in a "real world scenario"
setting. With this combined design we aim to include all patients with malignant gastric
outlet obstruction undergoing treatment. This will be an international multicentre effort,
with expert centers in Belgium and other countries in Europe, including UZ Brussel (BE), UCL
(BE), Hôpital Erasme (BE), UCL Namur (BE), UZ Gent (BE), Alicante (Spain), Gemelli Rome
(Italy), San-Rafaelle Milan (Italy) and G.B. Rossi University Hospital Verona (Italy) as
participating centres (total n=11).
This envisaged investigator driven study will be performed using an AXIOS stent produced by
the company BOSTON SCIENTIFIC. This stent is registered in Europe and CE approved for the
drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, the gall bladder and bile ducts. As described above
we and other groups have used this product off-label to succesfully perform EUS-guided GJ.
High-quality randomized controlled data are however required that will be generated in the
proposed EATING RCT study. It is expected that the data, generated by the EATING RCT trial
will contribute significantly to resolve the current question regarding the best management
of patients with GOO. Ultimately the objective should be to provide high quality affordable
care that is minimally invasive to cancer patients with GOO. Such high quality data will also
be crucial when applying for registration and CE approval of this product for use in the
management of GOO .
Description:
Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a relatively common disease manifestation amongst
patients with various types of malignancy. Until now, laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (L-GJ)
has been regarded as the golden standard for these specific patients, although recent
(low-quality) evidence suggests that off-label EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (EUS-GJ) with the
Hot-AXIOS stent might provide a safer alternative with similar effectiveness and shorter
hospital stay. The available comparative studies are unfortunately mainly of retrospective
design, include low numbers of EUS-GJ procedures and therefore prone to bias.
Currently, EUS-GJ is performed in the participating centres with the off-label use of the
Hot-AXIOS stent outside study context continuously. Moreover, whilst awaiting randomized
confirmation, the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has suggested EUS-GJ as an
alternative to L-GJ and enteral stenting in centers with expertise.
Study hypothesis: In patients with malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction we hypothesize that
endoscopic ultrasound guided placement of a lumen apposing stent, to create a
gastrojejunostomy, will result in reduced procedure related morbidity, shorter
time-to-tolerate oral intake, shorter hospital stay and a higher quality of life compared to
surgery, while reducing procedure related and overall costs. Primary endpoint is the overall
rate of procedure-related adverse events happening within 90 days of the endoscopic or
surgical procedure. Key secondary endpoints are time to oral intake and post-procedural
hospital stay.
The EATING study will utilize a combined design. In the EATING-C prospective, multicentre,
real-life, cohort study all patients with mGOO will be enrolled irrespective of their
performance status, their disease stage and treatment (i.e. EUS-GJ, OR surgical [laparoscopic
or not] GJ OR enteral stenting).
The subgroup of patients with expected survival over 2 months and without radiographic signs
of significantly obstructive peritoneal disease will be included in the EATING-RCT, an
international, open-label, parallel group, superiority randomized controlled trial in which
patients who fulfill the inclusion/exclusion criteria (see 4.2 inclusion criteria) and give
written informed consent will be randomized to either EUS-GJ or L-GJ. The same outcomes will
be prospectively evaluated in the EATING-C and EATING-RCT up to 12 months or death of the
patient, whichever comes first.
During the assessment of eligibility, patients will receive explanation of the treatment
possibilities for mGOO. If they fall within criteria for EATING-RCT they will be asked
informed consent for a randomization to L-GJ versus EUS-GJ. If they meet EATING-C, but not
EATING-RCT criteria or if they are willing to receive one specific procedure only, these
patients will not be randomized and thus be included in the EATING-C.
Expected full trial duration: 12 months after inclusion of last patient (target n=120).
Individual trial duration for patient: 12 months after treatment or time until death
(whichever comes first).
In previous published experiences, surgical Gastro-Jejunostomy has been associated with a 20
to 40% rate of adverse events (10.1055/s-0043-101695, 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000887). Previous
experiences of EUS-guided Gastro-Jejunostomy have found a 10 to 15% rate of adverse events
(10.1097/MCG.0000000000000887, 10.1016/j.dld.2020.04.021). We performed an international,
multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis of consecutive EUS-GJ and L-GJ
procedures in 3 European centres In this study we observed a 2.7% vs. 27.0% rate of overall
adverse events in EUS-GJ vs. L-GJ respectively.