View clinical trials related to Gallstones.
Filter by:The importance of multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain management is well known and regional anesthesia techniques are commonly prefferred to provide better analgesia. Erector spinae plane block (ESB) is a new defined and effective regional anesthesia technique. But two injections can be unconfortable for some patients. With this study, we aimed to compare the analgesia effect of bilateral and unilateral ESP block for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the magnetic compressive anastomosis has a better outcomes than traditional manual anastomosis on bilioenteric anastomosis.
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) requires a larger incision than standard laparoscopy, which may increase the incidence of incisional hernias. This study evaluated SILC and standard multiport cholecystectomy with respect to perioperative outcomes, hospital stay, cosmetic results, and postoperative complications, including the 5-years incisional hernia rate.
This pilot study aims to determine the utility of direct Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the assessment of suspected acute gallstone disease presentations. This will take the form of a randomized controlled trial, the design of which is based on recent internal audit data which indicated that a high proportion of patients ultimately require MRCP prior to diagnosis, treatment and discharge, and suggested that early scan may improve overall costs and outcomes. Patients with symptoms and signs suggestive of suspected gallstone disease and deranged liver function tests/amylase (i.e. suggestive of a potentially obstructive gallstone disease), will be enrolled across the full range of 'front-door' locations for surgical presentations within the hospital (Emergency Department, Surgical Emergency Unit, Ambulatory Assessment Unit), and randomized to one of two diagnostic pathways which are both existing variations in current clinical care: 1. MRCP is used as the first mode of imaging; 2. following a standard care model (ultrasound then MRCP if deemed appropriate). An assessment will then be undertaken of the cost-effectiveness of early MRCP versus standard care, using the primary outcome measure of cost to diagnostic scan report calculated using hospital episode statistics (HES), with secondary outcome measures to assess the overall utility which include length of stay, time to diagnosis, overall cost of admission using HES, in-hospital complications, Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), readmission and re-attendance rates (ED/GP), and service/radiology costs.
Although EPBD has a lower risk of post-ERCP bleeding and long-term complications than EST and is easier to perform in altered/difficult anatomy, EPBD is reserved for patients with bleeding diathesis by current consensus because some studies reported a higher risk of pancreatitis. However, recent meta-analyses indicate that short EPBD duration increases the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis, and EPBD with adequate duration has a similar pancreatitis risk and a lower overall complication rate compared with EST for choledocholithiasis. Therefore, this study aim to compare long-duration EPBD vs EST in the treatment of extrahepatic biliary stones.
To explore differences in patients, techniques and outcomes across the international cohort to identify areas of practice variability in the presentation and management of acute complicated calculous biliary disease.
It is a cross sectional study in which we are tying to determine frequency of type of gall stones in our setup(Lahore, Pakistan).
To discuss necessity of cholecystectomy for patients with stones in their bile ducts and gallbladders in the absence of absolute operation indications of cholecystectomy after clearance of bile duct stones with ERCP.
Background. X-ray cholangiography has a high sensitivity and specificity of detecting bile duct stones and is the gold standard. There are no studies describing the sensitivity and specificity of IFC for bile duct stone detection. Research question. What is the sensitivity of IFC to visualize bile duct stones? Method. Prospective study with 40 patients undergoing planned laparoscopic cholecystectomy with preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) (gold standard) and intraoperative IFC, X-ray cholangiography and choledochuscopy in that order. Primary outcome. Sensitivity of visualization of bile duct stone by fluorescent cholangiography and secondary outcome is visualization of anatomy.
In this study, investigators will investigate the microbiota of bile in common bile duct stone participants. Three key questions are of concern. The first one is whether there is bacteriria in bile in participants without common bile duct stone. The second one is whether the microbiota of bile is similar with that of gut mucosa in common bile duct stone participants. The third one is whether the bacteria in bile of common bile participants with intact papillar is the same as that of participants underwent sphinctomy.