View clinical trials related to Functional Constipation.
Filter by:The current diagnostic process of colonic motility disorders often takes a long time and involves multiple invasive, painful and/or unnecessary diagnostic procedures. To improve this diagnostic process, the potential of Electro-Entero-Graphy (EEnG) is investigated. During the EEnG procedure, several surface electrodes are positioned (under ultrasound guidance) on the abdomen so that electrical activity originating in the colon can be measured. Measurements will be performed after a period of fasting (when the colon is 'silent') and just after a meal (when the colon is moving) in both participants suffering from colonic motility disorders and healthy controls. It is hypothesized that these measurements are an indication of colonic motility and can be used as a diagnostic tool for colonic motility disorders. It is also hypothesized that this EEnG procedure is not more burdensome than the Gold Standard procedures for diagnosing colonic motility disorders. This will be assessed using questionnaires.
Functional constipation (FC) is a common condition in childhood, with an estimated prevalence of 0.7% to 29%.The diagnosis and treatment of FC can be difficult tasks, and children are often referred to specialist services causing treatment to become expensive and time-consuming.The standard treatment based on osmotic laxatives (mainly PEG). The recovery rate is 50% to 60% after 1 year of treatment, with 50% of the children having relapse within 5 years. Studies in adults have established the effectiveness of some lactic acid bacteria in the treatment of chronic constipation.
Functional constipation is extremely common in children and is defined as painful, hard stools or firm stools for twice or less per week. Functional constipation accounts for 3% of general pediatric visits and up to 25% of pediatric gastroenterology visits. Constipation and fecal impaction can lead to a range of symptoms including decreased appetite, vomiting, and abdominal pain frequently resulting in Emergency Department (ED) presentation. In contrast to the outpatient setting where diet and oral medications work well to relieve symptoms related to functional constipation, ED management requires an approach with quicker results. For immediate relief of symptoms, disimpaction via enema use may be better than polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 for children. However, the type of enema to be used is not well studied. Currently, any patient presenting to the ED with a presumed diagnosis of abdominal pain due to functional constipation receives an oral dose of PEG and one of the following three types of enemas (based on the ED treating attending's discretion): phosphate or Fleets enema, normal saline enema, or mineral oil enema. There is no evidence in the literature that demonstrates any difference in the effectiveness of each of these enemas. The investigators propose a randomized control trial of the three types of pediatric enemas readily used in our ED to determine the best approach. There will be three arms within this study: a) PEG plus phosphate enema b) PEG plus normal saline enema and c) PEG plus mineral oil enema. The physicians enrolling patients will not be the treating physicians. The four principal investigators (blinded to the type of enema being used), following appropriate informed consent, will obtain pain scores (Faces Pain Scale - Revised) pre- and post-administration of each of the three treatments listed above in order to determine the best enema to use in children 4-12 years of age. Other outcomes to be analyzed will include the patient's weight pre- and post-administration of the enema, satisfaction ratings on a visual analog scale from the treating physician (who will also be blinded), and parental surveys on the day of administration and 3-5 days following discharge. Data analysis for pain scores will be completed with repeated measures anova. Categorical values will be compared using Chi Square analysis and continuous variables will be compared using parametric statistics.
The aim of the study is to test the effect of polydextrose on whole gut transit time and gastrointestinal symptoms in a dose-responsive manner.