Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear Clinical Trial
Official title:
BioFiber and BioFiber-CM Absorbable Biologic Scaffold for Soft Tissue Repair and Reinforcement Post-Market Surveillance Clinical Study
Verified date | June 2017 |
Source | Tornier, Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational |
The aim of this study is to collect and report data from a consecutive series of patients implanted with these products as part of a post-market surveillance plan for CE Mark approval in the European Union.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 50 |
Est. completion date | April 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | April 2015 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients 18 years of age or older - Patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears (confirmed at time of surgery) that are eligible for rotator cuff repair. - Patients willing and able to comply with the requirements of the study protocol and provide informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients with active or latent infection - Patients with decreased vascularity - Patients with pathological soft tissue conditions - Patients with a known allergy or sensitivity to tetracycline hydrochloride or kanamycin sulfate - Patients with a known allergy or sensitivity to bovine collagen (BioFiber-CM only) - Participating in a concurrent study that has not been approved for concurrent enrollment by the Clinical Study Manager |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | St. Gregoire | St. Gregoire | |
United States | University of Virginia Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery | Charlottesville | Virginia |
United States | Insall Scott Kelly Institute | New York | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Tornier, Inc. |
United States, France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants With Device Associated Adverse Events | The primary objective is to report the number of participants with device associated adverse events. Device associated adverse events are defined as adverse events that are classified as possibly or definitely related to the study product or procedure, or anticipated adverse events listed in the product's Instruction for Use regardless of relationship to the study device. |
12 Months | |
Secondary | Clinical Functional Outcome - Adjusted Constant-Murley Score | Evaluate clinical functional outcome Adjusted Constant-Murley Score. The Constant-Murley score (CMS) is a 100-points scale composed of a number of individual parameters. These parameters define the level of pain and the ability to carry out the normal daily activities of the patient.[1] The Constant-Murley score was introduced to determine the functionality after the treatment of a shoulder injury. The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points) and range of motion: forward elevation, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder (40 points). The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function. A score of 0 is considered the worst outcome and 100 is considered the best outcome. | 6 Months | |
Secondary | Clinical Functional Outcome - Adjusted Constant-Murley Score | Evaluate clinical functional outcome Adjusted Constant-Murley Score. The Constant-Murley score (CMS) is a 100-points scale composed of a number of individual parameters. These parameters define the level of pain and the ability to carry out the normal daily activities of the patient.[1] The Constant-Murley score was introduced to determine the functionality after the treatment of a shoulder injury. The test is divided into four subscales: pain (15 points), activities of daily living (20 points), strength (25 points) and range of motion: forward elevation, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder (40 points). The higher the score, the higher the quality of the function. A score of 0 is considered the worst outcome and 100 is considered the best outcome. | 12 Month | |
Secondary | Clinical Functional Outcome - WORC Index | Evaluate clinical functional outcome WORC Index. This is a quality-of-life measurement specific for rotator cuff disease based on 21 questions answered using visual analog scales. It is organized in 5 subscales: physical symptoms, sprots/recreation, work, lifestyle, and emotions. Each item has a possible score from 0-100 where higher scores represent a lower quality of life. The scores are summed up to a possible 2100 points. The total number of points is subtracted from 2100, divided by 2100, then multiplied by 100 to create a percentage. The final score is thus a percentage ranging from 0 to 100 with higher percentages indicating better quality of life. | 6 Months | |
Secondary | Clinical Functional Outcome - WORC Index | Evaluate clinical functional outcome WORC Index. This is a quality-of-life measurement specific for rotator cuff disease based on 21 questions answered using visual analog scales. It is organized in 5 subscales: physical symptoms, sprots/recreation, work, lifestyle, and emotions. Each item has a possible score from 0-100 where higher scores represent a lower quality of life. The scores are summed up to a possible 2100 points. The total number of points is subtracted from 2100, divided by 2100, then multiplied by 100 to create a percentage. The final score is thus a percentage ranging from 0 to 100 with higher percentages indicating better quality of life. | 12 Months | |
Secondary | Number of Study Participants With Re-tears | Assess re-tears of the repaired tendon using ultrasound imaging. The definition of a re-tear for the rate reported is any full thickness tear in a tendon that was repaired with the BioFiber Scaffold that is at least 80% of the size of the original tear. | 6 Months | |
Secondary | Number of Study Participants With Re-tears | Assess re-tears of the repaired tendon using ultrasound imaging. The definition of a re-tear for the rate reported is any full thickness tear in a tendon that was repaired with the BioFiber Scaffold that is at least 80% of the size of the original tear. | 12 Months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01256242 -
Pilot Study of Augment Rotator Cuff for Surgical Treatment of Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02484950 -
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Augmentation in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01557309 -
Clinical and Structural Outcome After Early Repair of the Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tear
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01819909 -
Effectiveness Study of Postoperative Rotator Cuff Repair Rehabilitation
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04115644 -
Effectiveness of Corticosteroid vs. Ketorolac Shoulder Injections: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02915588 -
Early Active Rehabilitation After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01499992 -
Rehabilitation of Reconstructed Shoulder Rotator Cuff
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01987973 -
Allograft Reconstruction of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears vs Partial Repair Alone
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03021733 -
A Pilot Cohort Study of Surgical and Non-surgical Management of Rotator Cuff Tears
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01481480 -
Latissimus Dorsi Tendon Transfer or Partial Arthroscopic Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02740946 -
Enhanced Function and Quality of Life Following 5 Months of Exercise Therapy for Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02750176 -
Rehabilitation: Closed-Chain Exercises for Rotator Cuff Tears
|
Early Phase 1 |