Effects of App-assisted Home Exercise Program in Patients With Frozen Shoulder

Frozen Shoulder Clinical Trial

Official title:

Mobile Device Based Telerehabilitation for Frozen Shoulder-A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05980572
• Other study ID #: Defrozen_Shoulder_App
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 1, 2023
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: August 2023
• Source: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
• Contact: Chih-Chi Chen, MD
• Phone: +886975365705
• Email: claudia5477[@]gmail.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Abstract Introduction Frozen shoulder is a common musculoskeletal disorder with reported lifetime prevalence to be 2%~5% in the general population. Patients with frozen shoulders present with chronic pain and limited range of motion of affected shoulder and often cause an adverse impact on their daily activities and working ability. Shoulder exercises had been proven to be effective in treatment of frozen shoulders and the effects were even better after intraarticular corticosteroid injection. Strategies to enhance home exercise for patients with frozen shoulders are essential. Objective To compare the effects of home exercises delivered by a newly developed app named Defrozen app with that by convention home exercise for frozen shoulder patients after intra-articular corticosteroid injection. Methods and analysis This is a randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded clinical trial. Seventy-eight individuals diagnosed with frozen shoulders will be randomly divided into two groups. The primary outcome will be shoulder pain evaluated by 11-point numeric rating scale. The secondary outcomes will include shoulder passive range of motion (measured with a universal goniometer), , Oxford shoulder score and Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire. Feasibility of the app includes including Technology Acceptance Model (TAM-2), System Usability Scale (SUS) and Usability, Satisfaction and Ease of Use (USE) questionnaire . The treatment will be conducted for 6 months (Defrozen app home exercise x conventional home exercise by instructions from printed pamphlets).All participants will receive outcome measurements assessment prior to randomization , 4 weeks , 12 weeks after injections interventions. Feasibility will be evaluated 4 weeks after intervention in the Defrozen app group. Ethics and dissemination The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board. The findings of the trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences.

Description:

The primary objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that a 12-week frozen shoulder exercise program delivered through the mobile app will result in greater improvement in shoulder pain compared to the control group. The control group will receive conventional home exercises provided on paper for patients with frozen shoulder after undergoing intra-articular corticosteroid injection.The secondary objective is to assess the differences in range of motion and functional outcomes between the two groups of patients. Additionally, the feasibility and acceptability of the Defrozen-App to these patients will be evaluated. This study will employ a prospective, two-armed, assessor-blinded superiority randomized controlled trial design to compare two parallel groups of patients with primary frozen shoulder. The study was designed in accordance with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines for planning interventional trials. The trial results will be reported following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. This study will be conducted in the northern branch of a medical system, which includes three hospitals located in northern Taiwan. The trial is registered [provide registration number or leave it blank if not available]. The recruitment of patients will take place in the clinic of the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Linko, and Taoyuan branches. A Mobile Phone App for Demonstrating Home Exercises for Frozen Shoulder: The Defrozen app is designed to provide simple home exercise programs for patients with frozen shoulders. It includes various features such as a training mode with exercise demonstrations, an exercise calendar, and pain evaluation.The main screen of the app displays exercise videos that are demonstrated by one of our researchers. It consists of seven sets of exercises specifically selected by physicians and a physiotherapist in our team. These exercises include Finger Walk for shoulder flexion and abduction, self-stretching exercises for shoulder external rotation and pectoral muscles, and crossover arm stretch for shoulder adduction. Additionally, towel exercises for shoulder extension and internal rotation are included. Each set of exercises consists of 10 repetitions, and we recommend performing four sessions per day. The total exercise time for one session is approximately 8 minutes. We encourage users to follow the exercise demonstrations provided in the app.After completing the exercise mode, the app prompts the patient to indicate whether they have completed the exercise and record their current pain intensity on a scale ranging from 0 to 10 . The app then transitions to the calendar mode, which displays the number of exercise sessions completed on that day and reminds the patient of the remaining sessions to be completed. Procedures: Participants will be recruited from the clinics of physical medicine and rehabilitation in a medical center located in northern Taiwan. Detailed information about the study will be provided to all eligible patients, and written informed consent will be obtained from each participant. All study visits will take place at a clinical laboratory near the clinics. The assessor will collect baseline data from participants prior to randomization. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at two time points: 4 weeks after the interventions and 12 weeks after the interventions. Feasibility of the interventions will be evaluated only after the 4-week intervention period. Random Allocation: Random allocation of participants will be conducted using computer-generated random numbers in a 1:1 ratio. This process will be performed by one of the authors who is independent of the screening, patient recruitment, clinical care, and data collection. Subjects will be randomly assigned to either the Defrozen App group or the conventional group, ensuring equal allocation between the two groups. The generated random number list will be placed into sequentially numbered, opaque, and sealed envelopes. These envelopes will be securely stored by the researcher responsible for allocation. Once a subject has been confirmed as eligible and has provided informed consent, the envelope corresponding to their sequential order will be opened to reveal their group allocation. Blinding: Participant allocation and follow-up arrangements will be overseen by a clinical researcher who will not be blinded to the participants' group assignments. However, to minimize bias, outcome measure assessments will be conducted by a physician from the study team who will be unaware of the participants' intervention groups. Interventions In this study, all patients, regardless of their group allocation, will receive both glenohumeral joint and subacromial space injections. This decision is based on previous research that has suggested a synergistic effect of combination injections in increasing joint internal rotation angle. (Proper site of corticosteroid injection for the treatment of idiopathic frozen shoulder: Results from a randomized trial)The injections will consist of a solution containing 1 ml of 40 mg/ml triamcinolone acetonide and 1 ml of 1% lidocaine in each site. The glenohumeral joint injection will be performed blindly using an anterior approach. The needle will be inserted medially to the head of the humerus, located approximately 1 cm lateral to the coracoid process, and directed posteriorly at a slight superior and lateral angle.Previous studies have suggested that blind anterior glenohumeral joint injection yields comparable pain and functional outcomes to ultrasound-guided injection. Additionally, the anterior approach has shown better pain control and improved functional activity recovery in the early stages of primary frozen shoulder compared to the posterior approach. For the subacromial injection, ultrasound guidance will be employed to potentially achieve greater clinical improvement in shoulder pain compared to blind injection.Following the injections, patients will receive instructions on performing the seven sets of frozen shoulder exercises mentioned earlier. The APP group will be guided through the exercises using the mobile app, while the conventional group will be provided with a printed pamphlet illustrating the exercises. Each set of exercises will involve 10 repetitions, and it is recommended to perform four sessions per day. Additionally, all patients will be prescribed two weeks of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (aceclofenac) to manage pain and inflammation.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 76
• Est. completion date: December 31, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: December 31, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 20 Years and older

Eligibility

Eligibility Criteria:

Patients with frozen shoulder who are scheduled to receive intra-articular glucocorticosteroid injections, as determined by the physician investigator, will be consecutively enrolled in the study. To be included in the study, patients must meet the

following criteria:

1. Unilateral frozen shoulder.

2. Suitability for treatment with intra-articular and subacromial glucocorticosteroid injection.

3. Patients must fulfill the diagnostic criteria for frozen shoulder, as described by Bulgen et al. These criteria include shoulder pain persisting for at least 1 month, sleep disturbance (such as night pain or inability to lie on the affected side), restriction of all active and passive shoulder movements, and a reduction of passive glenohumeral external rotation by at least 50% compared to the unaffected side.

4. Plain radiographs of the shoulder will be obtained to exclude other pathologies.

Patients will be excluded from the study if they meet any of the following criteria:

1. Age younger than 20 years old.

2. Bilateral involvement of the shoulder.

3. Secondary frozen shoulder resulting from trauma.

4. History of shoulder joint injections or upper limb surgery within the past month. Presence of rheumatoid arthritis, central nervous system disorders, or cervical radiculopathy.

5. Cognitive disorders or inability to understand exercise instructions.

6. Contraindications for anesthesia or corticosteroid injection.

7. Lack of familiarity with using smartphones.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Bursitis
• Frozen Shoulder

Intervention

Drug:
• Glenohumeral joint and subacromial space triamcinolone injections
All patients will receive both glenohumeral joint and subacromial space injections. The injections will consist of a solution containing 1 ml of 40 mg/ml triamcinolone acetonide and 1 ml of 1% lidocaine in each site. The glenohumeral joint injection will be performed blindly using an anterior approach. The needle will be inserted medially to the head of the humerus, located approximately 1 cm lateral to the coracoid process, and directed posteriorly at a slight superior and lateral angle. Patients will be educated on how to perform the 7 sets of frozen shoulder exercise. Subjects will be advised to perform all the exercises to a point that they may feel tightness but not painful and hold to the point for 2-3 seconds.

Device:
• App-assisted exercise
Patients will be educated on how to perform the 7 sets of frozen shoulder exercise. Subjects will be advised to perform all the exercises to a point that they may feel tightness but not painful and hold to the point for 2-3 seconds. Then the APP group will suggest performing the exercise from APP education The APP intervention group will be guided through the exercises using the mobile app, while the conventional group will be provided with a printed pamphlet illustrating the exercises.. Each set exercise will have 10 repetitions and investigators recommend 4 sessions per day.

Drug:
• Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (aceclofenac)
All patients will be prescribed two weeks of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (aceclofenac) .

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Taiwan	Chang Gung Memorial Hospital	Taoyuan

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Taiwan, 

References & Publications (37)

Antoine Parker C, Ellis R. Effect of Electronic Messaging on Physical Activity Participation among Older Adults. J Aging Res. 2016;2016:6171028. doi: 10.1155/2016/6171028. Epub 2016 May 17. — View Citation

Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN; Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1038-46. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060. — View Citation

Bulgen DY, Binder AI, Hazleman BL, Dutton J, Roberts S. Frozen shoulder: prospective clinical study with an evaluation of three treatment regimens. Ann Rheum Dis. 1984 Jun;43(3):353-60. doi: 10.1136/ard.43.3.353. — View Citation

Carbonaro N, Lucchesi I, Lorusssi F, Tognetti A. Tele-monitoring and tele-rehabilitation of the shoulder muscular-skeletal diseases through wearable systems. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:4410-4413. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513371. — View Citation

Challoumas D, Biddle M, McLean M, Millar NL. Comparison of Treatments for Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029581. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29581. — View Citation

Chen HC, Chuang TY, Lin PC, Lin YK, Chuang YH. Effects of Messages Delivered by Mobile Phone on Increasing Compliance With Shoulder Exercises Among Patients With a Frozen Shoulder. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017 Jul;49(4):429-437. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12308. Epub 2017 Jun 20. — View Citation

Cho CH, Kim du H, Bae KC, Lee D, Kim K. Proper site of corticosteroid injection for the treatment of idiopathic frozen shoulder: Results from a randomized trial. Joint Bone Spine. 2016 May;83(3):324-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.06.014. Epub 2016 Feb 10. — View Citation

Cho CH, Min BW, Bae KC, Lee KJ, Kim DH. A prospective double-blind randomized trial on ultrasound-guided versus blind intra-articular corticosteroid injections for primary frozen shoulder. Bone Joint J. 2021 Feb;103-B(2):353-359. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0755.R1. — View Citation

Choi Y, Nam J, Yang D, Jung W, Lee HR, Kim SH. Effect of smartphone application-supported self-rehabilitation for frozen shoulder: a prospective randomized control study. Clin Rehabil. 2019 Apr;33(4):653-660. doi: 10.1177/0269215518818866. Epub 2018 Dec 10. — View Citation

Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Jul;78(4):593-600. — View Citation

Dawson J, Rogers K, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The Oxford shoulder score revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Jan;129(1):119-23. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0549-7. Epub 2008 Jan 9. — View Citation

Deng Z, Li Z, Li X, Chen Z, Shen C, Sun X, Shu H, Wu J, Tang K. Comparison of Outcomes of Two Different Corticosteroid Injection Approaches for Primary Frozen Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Rehabil Med. 2023 Jan 3;55:jrm00361. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.2201. — View Citation

Elgert L, Steiner B, Saalfeld B, Marschollek M, Wolf KH. Health-Enabling Technologies to Assist Patients With Musculoskeletal Shoulder Disorders When Exercising at Home: Scoping Review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Feb 4;8(1):e21107. doi: 10.2196/21107. — View Citation

Gleyze P, Clavert P, Flurin PH, Laprelle E, Katz D, Toussaint B, Benkalfate T, Charousset C, Joudet T, Georges T, Hubert L, Lafosse L, Hardy P, Solignac N, Levigne C; French Arthroscopy Society. Management of the stiff shoulder. A prospective multicenter comparative study of the six main techniques in use: 235 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Dec;97(8 Suppl):S167-81. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 28. — View Citation

Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 May 18;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-44. — View Citation

Hardage J, Peel C, Morris D, Graham C, Brown C, Foushee HR, Braswell J. Adherence to Exercise Scale for Older Patients (AESOP): a measure for predicting exercise adherence in older adults after discharge from home health physical therapy. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2007;30(2):69-78. doi: 10.1519/00139143-200708000-00006. — View Citation

Kelley MJ, Shaffer MA, Kuhn JE, Michener LA, Seitz AL, Uhl TL, Godges JJ, McClure PW. Shoulder pain and mobility deficits: adhesive capsulitis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 May;43(5):A1-31. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.0302. Epub 2013 Apr 30. No abstract available. — View Citation

Kim BH, Glanz K. Text messaging to motivate walking in older African Americans: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jan;44(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.050. — View Citation

Liang HW, Wang HK, Yao G, Horng YS, Hou SM. Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwan version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. J Formos Med Assoc. 2004 Oct;103(10):773-9. — View Citation

Liao CH, Wu YT, Cheng CT, Ooyang CH, Kang SC, Fu CY, Hsu YP, Hsieh CH, Chen CC. An Image-Based Mobile Health App for Postdrainage Monitoring: Usability Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 28;22(8):e17686. doi: 10.2196/17686. — View Citation

Mertens MG, Meert L, Struyf F, Schwank A, Meeus M. Exercise Therapy Is Effective for Improvement in Range of Motion, Function, and Pain in Patients With Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 May;103(5):998-1012.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.806. Epub 2021 Aug 21. — View Citation

Mezian K, Coffey R, Chang KV. Frozen Shoulder. 2022 Aug 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482162/ — View Citation

Millar NL, Meakins A, Struyf F, Willmore E, Campbell AL, Kirwan PD, Akbar M, Moore L, Ronquillo JC, Murrell GAC, Rodeo SA. Frozen shoulder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 Sep 8;8(1):59. doi: 10.1038/s41572-022-00386-2. — View Citation

Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):920-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Mar 17. — View Citation

Pandey V, Madi S. Clinical Guidelines in the Management of Frozen Shoulder: An Update! Indian J Orthop. 2021 Feb 1;55(2):299-309. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00351-3. eCollection 2021 Apr. — View Citation

Pfeifer AC, Uddin R, Schroder-Pfeifer P, Holl F, Swoboda W, Schiltenwolf M. Mobile Application-Based Interventions for Chronic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness. J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 5;9(11):3557. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113557. — View Citation

Rangan A, Brealey SD, Keding A, Corbacho B, Northgraves M, Kottam L, Goodchild L, Srikesavan C, Rex S, Charalambous CP, Hanchard N, Armstrong A, Brooksbank A, Carr A, Cooper C, Dias JJ, Donnelly I, Hewitt C, Lamb SE, McDaid C, Richardson G, Rodgers S, Sharp E, Spencer S, Torgerson D, Toye F; UK FROST Study Group. Management of adults with primary frozen shoulder in secondary care (UK FROST): a multicentre, pragmatic, three-arm, superiority randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2020 Oct 3;396(10256):977-989. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31965-6. Erratum In: Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):98. — View Citation

Robinson PM, Norris J, Roberts CP. Randomized controlled trial of supervised physiotherapy versus a home exercise program after hydrodilatation for the management of primary frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 May;26(5):757-765. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Mar 18. — View Citation

Russell S, Jariwala A, Conlon R, Selfe J, Richards J, Walton M. A blinded, randomized, controlled trial assessing conservative management strategies for frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Apr;23(4):500-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.026. — View Citation

Sarasua SM, Floyd S, Bridges WC, Pill SG. The epidemiology and etiology of adhesive capsulitis in the U.S. Medicare population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 27;22(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04704-9. — View Citation

Sharma SP, Baerheim A, Kvale A. Passive range of motion in patients with adhesive shoulder capsulitis, an intertester reliability study over eight weeks. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Feb 22;16:37. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0495-4. — View Citation

Steiner B, Richter I, Elgert L, Haux R, Wolf KH. Mobile Health Applications for Rehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Diseases of the Shoulder: A Systematic Analysis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 24;278:195-202. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210069. — View Citation

Stutz T, Emsenhuber G, Huber D, Domhardt M, Tiefengrabner M, Oostingh GJ, Fotschl U, Matis N, Ginzinger S. Mobile Phone-Supported Physiotherapy for Frozen Shoulder: Feasibility Assessment Based on a Usability Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Jul 20;4(2):e6. doi: 10.2196/rehab.7085. — View Citation

Tallia AF, Cardone DA. Diagnostic and therapeutic injection of the shoulder region. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Mar 15;67(6):1271-8. — View Citation

Vorrink SN, Kort HS, Troosters T, Lammers JW. A Mobile Phone App to Stimulate Daily Physical Activity in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Development, Feasibility, and Pilot Studies. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jan 26;4(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4741. — View Citation

Walker-Bone K, Palmer KT, Reading I, Coggon D, Cooper C. Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in the general population. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Aug 15;51(4):642-51. doi: 10.1002/art.20535. — View Citation

Wu T, Song HX, Dong Y, Li JH. Ultrasound-guided versus blind subacromial-subdeltoid bursa injection in adults with shoulder pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Dec;45(3):374-8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 May 21. — View Citation

* Note: There are 37 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change of Shoulder pain by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)	To assess shoulder pain, investigators will utilize an 11-point NRS. Patients will be informed that a score of 0 represents no pain, while a score of 10 indicates the highest level of pain.	prior to randomization, 4-weeks after interventions and 12-weeks after intervention
Secondary	Change of Oxford shoulder score (OSS).	A patient-rated outcome measure of shoulder pain and function in patients with shoulder pain. OSS has twelve questions with five possible responses ranging from 0 (worst) to 4 (best).	prior to randomization, 4-weeks after interventions and 12-weeks after intervention
Secondary	Change shoulder active range of motion in degree	The range of motion of the shoulder will be assessed using a universal goniometer, which measures the angle of movement between specific bone landmarks. The investigator will evaluate the active range of motion of the affected shoulder, including flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation, using the goniometer to determine the degrees of movement in each direction. Active range of movement of the affected shoulder, including flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation, will be measured by goniometer in degree.	prior to randomization, 4-weeks after interventions and 12-weeks after intervention
Secondary	Change of Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Head (QuickDASH) score	The QuickDASH is a modified version of the original 30-item Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, consisting of 11 items. A minimum of 10 items must be completed by the participant. Each item has five response options.The total QuickDASH score ranges from 0 (indicating no disability) to 100 (representing the most severe disability)	prior to randomization, 4-weeks after interventions and 12-weeks after intervention
Secondary	Selected part of revised Technology Acceptance Model (TAM-2)	The selected part of revised Technology Acceptance Model(TAM-2) including intention to use, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Participants will be asked to rate their agreement with each statement on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree."	4 weeks after intervention in App intervention group
Secondary	System Usability Scale (SUS)	he SUS is a standardized questionnaire that consists of ten statements related to the usability of the application. Participants will be asked to rate their agreement with each statement on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree."	4 weeks after intervention in App intervention group
Secondary	Usability, Satisfaction and Ease of Use (USE) questionnaire	The questionnaire consists of four statements related to the system or application being evaluated. Participants will be asked to rate their agreement with each statement on a five-point Likert scale, ranging from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree."	4 weeks after intervention in App intervention group