Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT06130397
Other study ID # 310995-C
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date February 8, 2024
Est. completion date June 2025

Study information

Verified date June 2024
Source Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Contact Alex Novak, MSc
Phone +44 7944653979
Email alex.novak@ouh.nhs.uk
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

This study has been added as a sub study to the Simulation Training for Emergency Department Imaging 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05427838). This work aims to evaluate the impact of an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enhanced algorithm called Boneview on the diagnostic accuracy of clinicians in the detection of fractures on plain XR (X-Ray). The study will create a dataset of 500 plain X-Rays involving standard images of all bones other than the skull and cervical spine, with 50% normal cases and 50% containing fractures. A reference 'ground truth' for each image to confirm the presence or absence of a fracture will be established by a senior radiologist panel. This dataset will then be inferenced by the Gleamer Boneview algorithm to identify fractures. Performance of the algorithm will be compared against the reference standard. The study will then undertake a Multiple-Reader Multiple-Case study in which clinicians interpret all images without AI and then subsequently with access to the output of the AI algorithm. 18 clinicians will be recruited as readers with 3 from each of six distinct clinical groups: Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Emergency Nurse Practitioners, Physiotherapy, Radiology and Radiographers, with three levels of seniority in each group. Changes in reporting accuracy (sensitivity, specificity), confidence, and speed of readers in two sessions will be compared. The results will be analyzed in a pooled analysis for all readers as well as for the following subgroups: Clinical role, Level of seniority, Pathological finding, Difficulty of image. The study will demonstrate the impact of an AI interpretation as compared with interpretation by clinicians, and as compared with clinicians using the AI as an adjunct to their interpretation. The study will represent a range of professional backgrounds and levels of experience among the clinical element. The study will use plain film x-rays that will represent a range of anatomical views and pathological presentations, however x-rays will present equal numbers of pathological and non-pathological x-rays, giving equal weight to assessment of specificity and sensitivity. Ethics approval has already been granted, and the study will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at relevant conferences.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 21
Est. completion date June 2025
Est. primary completion date October 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Emergency medicine doctors, trauma and orthopaedic surgeons, emergency nurse practitioners, physiotherapists, general radiologists and radiographers reviewing X-rays as part of their routine clinical practice. - Currently working in the National Health Service (NHS). Exclusion Criteria: - Non-radiology physicians with previous formal postgraduate XR reporting training. - Non-radiology physicians with previous career in radiology

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
Cases reading
The reading will be done remotely via the Report and Image Quality Control site (www.RAIQC.com), an online platform allowing medical imaging viewing and reporting. Participants can work from any location, but the work must be done from a computer with internet access. For avoidance of doubt, the work cannot be performed from a phone or tablet. The project is divided into two phases and participants are required to complete both phases. The estimated total involvement in the project is up to 20-24 hours. Phase 1: Time allowed: 2 weeks - Participants must review 500 X-rays and express a clinical opinion through a structured reporting template (multiple choice, no open text required). Rest/washout period - Time allowed: 4 weeks, to mitigate the effects of recall bias. Phase 2 - Time allowed: 2 weeks - Review 500 X-rays together with an AI report for each case and express their clinical opinion through the same structured reporting template used in Phase 1.
Ground truthing
Two consultant musculoskeletal radiologists will independently review the images to establish the 'ground truth' findings on the XRs, where a consensus is reached this will then be used as the reference standard. In the case of disagreement, a third senior musculoskeletal radiologist's opinion (>20 years experience) will undertake arbitration. A difficulty score will be assigned to each abnormality by the ground truthers using a 4-point Likert scale (1 being easy/obvious to 4 being hard/poorly visualised).

Locations

Country Name City State
United Kingdom Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford Oxfordshire
United Kingdom Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford Oxfordshire

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust Gleamer

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

References & Publications (13)

Blazar E, Mitchell D, Townzen JD. Radiology Training in Emergency Medicine Residency as a Predictor of Confidence in an Attending. Cureus. 2020 Jan 9;12(1):e6615. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6615. — View Citation

Chilamkurthy S, Ghosh R, Tanamala S, Biviji M, Campeau NG, Venugopal VK, Mahajan V, Rao P, Warier P. Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study. Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2388-2396. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31645-3. Epub 2018 Oct 11. — View Citation

Donaldson LJ, Reckless IP, Scholes S, Mindell JS, Shelton NJ. The epidemiology of fractures in England. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Feb;62(2):174-80. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.056622. — View Citation

Duron L, Ducarouge A, Gillibert A, Laine J, Allouche C, Cherel N, Zhang Z, Nitche N, Lacave E, Pourchot A, Felter A, Lassalle L, Regnard NE, Feydy A. Assessment of an AI Aid in Detection of Adult Appendicular Skeletal Fractures by Emergency Physicians and Radiologists: A Multicenter Cross-sectional Diagnostic Study. Radiology. 2021 Jul;300(1):120-129. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203886. Epub 2021 May 4. — View Citation

Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, Abraham L, Sickles EA, D'Orsi C, Berns EA, Cutter G, Hendrick RE, Barlow WE, Elmore JG. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 5;356(14):1399-409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066099. — View Citation

Hussain F, Cooper A, Carson-Stevens A, Donaldson L, Hibbert P, Hughes T, Edwards A. Diagnostic error in the emergency department: learning from national patient safety incident report analysis. BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Dec 4;19(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0289-3. — View Citation

National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK). Fractures (Non-Complex): Assessment and Management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2016 Feb. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK344251/ — View Citation

Obuchowski NA, Bullen J. Multireader Diagnostic Accuracy Imaging Studies: Fundamentals of Design and Analysis. Radiology. 2022 Apr;303(1):26-34. doi: 10.1148/radiol.211593. Epub 2022 Feb 15. — View Citation

Patel MR, Norgaard BL, Fairbairn TA, Nieman K, Akasaka T, Berman DS, Raff GL, Hurwitz Koweek LM, Pontone G, Kawasaki T, Sand NPR, Jensen JM, Amano T, Poon M, Ovrehus KA, Sonck J, Rabbat MG, Mullen S, De Bruyne B, Rogers C, Matsuo H, Bax JJ, Leipsic J. 1-Year Impact on Medical Practice and Clinical Outcomes of FFRCT: The ADVANCE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jan;13(1 Pt 1):97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 17. — View Citation

Smith BJ, Hillis SL. Multi-reader multi-case analysis of variance software for diagnostic performance comparison of imaging modalities. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2020 Feb;11316:113160K. doi: 10.1117/12.2549075. Epub 2020 Mar 16. — View Citation

Snaith B, Hardy M. Emergency department image interpretation accuracy: The influence of immediate reporting by radiology. Int Emerg Nurs. 2014 Apr;22(2):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 30. — View Citation

van Leeuwen KG, Schalekamp S, Rutten MJCM, van Ginneken B, de Rooij M. Artificial intelligence in radiology: 100 commercially available products and their scientific evidence. Eur Radiol. 2021 Jun;31(6):3797-3804. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07892-z. Epub 2021 Apr 15. — View Citation

York TJ, Jenkins PJ, Ireland AJ. Reporting Discrepancy Resolved by Findings and Time in 2947 Emergency Department Ankle X-rays. Skeletal Radiol. 2020 Apr;49(4):601-611. doi: 10.1007/s00256-019-03317-7. Epub 2019 Nov 21. — View Citation

* Note: There are 13 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Performance of AI algorithm: sensitivity Evaluation of the Gleamer Boneview algorithm will be performed comparing it to the reference standard in order to determine sensitivity. During 4 weeks of reading time
Primary Performance of AI algorithm: specificity Evaluation of the Gleamer Boneview will be performed comparing it to the reference standard in order to determine specificity. During 4 weeks of reading time
Primary Performance of AI algorithm: Area under the ROC Curve (AU ROC) Evaluation of the Gleamer Boneview algorithm will be performed comparing it to the reference standard. Continuous probability score from the algorithm will be utilised for the ROC analyses, while binary classification results with a predefined operating cut-off will be used for evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. During 4 weeks of reading time
Primary Performance of readers with and without AI assistance: Sensitivity The study will include two sessions (with and without AI overlay), with all 18 readers reviewing all 500 XR cases each time separated by a washout period to mitigate recall bias. The cases will be randomised between the two reads and for every reader. During 4 weeks of reading time
Primary Performance of readers with and without AI assistance: Specificity The study will include two sessions (with and without AI overlay), with all 18 readers reviewing all 500 XR cases each time separated by a washout period to mitigate recall bias. The cases will be randomised between the two reads and for every reader. During 4 weeks of reading time
Primary Performance of readers with and without AI assistance: Area under the ROC Curve (AU ROC) The study will include two sessions (with and without AI overlay), with all 18 readers reviewing all 500 XR cases each time separated by a washout period to mitigate recall bias. The cases will be randomised between the two reads and for every reader. During 4 weeks of reading time
Primary Reader speed with vs without AI assistance. Mean time taken to review a XR, with vs without AI assistance. During 4 weeks of reading time
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Withdrawn NCT04470895 - Impact of Drugs on the Risk of Falls in the Fracture Department of the Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group
Recruiting NCT02635022 - Fragility Fracture Liaison Service and Anti-osteoporosis Medication Monitoring Service Study
Unknown status NCT02013986 - Effects of Etomidate on Postoperative Circadian Rhythm Changes of Salivary Cortisol in Children Phase 4
Terminated NCT01248182 - Bone to Skin Thickness Study: Obese Versus Normal Population N/A
Recruiting NCT00969839 - NovaLign Intramedullary Fixation System (IFS) for the Treatment of Humeral Fractures Phase 4
Completed NCT00115180 - Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Acute Pain Control N/A
Completed NCT00520442 - Acute Pediatric Fracture Analgesia Study N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06402292 - Surgical Treatment of Osteoarticular Infections Using Bioactive Bone Substitute N/A
Recruiting NCT04947722 - The PREVENT Trial: a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of a Multifaceted Fracture Prevention Model for Long-term Care N/A
Recruiting NCT06107699 - The CHARM Study-Coordinating Transitions From Hospital for Older Adults With Fractures N/A
Completed NCT04532580 - Clinical Validation of Boneview for FDA Submission
Completed NCT04237454 - Thermal Imaging Compared to Skeletal Survey in Children Below 2 Years N/A
Recruiting NCT05002335 - Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Medacta Shoulder System (BE)
Completed NCT02591043 - Surgical Treatment of Low Energy Pelvic Fractures in the Elderly N/A
Completed NCT02933359 - Osteogenic Profiling of Normal Calvarial Bone
Completed NCT01049191 - Bone Microarchitecture in Women With and Without Fracture N/A
Completed NCT03431857 - Multi Centre Study on TESS V2 Shoulder System
Recruiting NCT04133103 - Early Mobilisation in the Surgical Robot Assisted Spinal Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03993691 - Wrist Fracture Evaluation With a Desktop Orthopedic Tomosynthesis System N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT01719887 - Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Surgical Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures. Randomized Controlled Trial N/A