Focus Groups Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Laryngeal Tube Suction vs Endotracheal Tube for Ventilation in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery
This study the investigators compare peak airway pressure (PAP), expire tidal volume (TV), end tidal CO2 (ETCO2), SpO2, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) after the insertion of laryngeal tube suction or endotracheal tube in patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery.
Background:
For standard procedure, the endotracheal tube is used to ventilate the anesthetized patients
who undergo gynecological laparoscopic surgery that increase intrabdominal pressure. Now
there is a new supraglottic airway device, laryngeal tube suction (LTs) can be use instead
of ETT.
Objective This study the investigators compare peak airway pressure (PAP), expire tidal
volume (TV), end tidal CO2 (ETCO2), SpO2, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR)
after the insertion of laryngeal tube suction or endotracheal tube in patients undergoing
elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery.
Material and methods Prospective single blinded randomized control trial, the patients were
divided into two groups, LTs group and ETT group n = 60 for each group. All patients were
induced anesthesia with fentanyl 1-2 mcg/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg, vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg then
maintained anesthesia with air : oxygen 30%. Respirator setting are tidal volume 10 ml/kg,
I/E 1:2 adjust RR base on ETCO2 keep ETCO2 35-40 mmHg.
Results No statistical difference in demographic data between groups. PAP and ETCO2 in the
LTs group were significant higher than ETT group in the first 5 and 10 minutes but no
statistically significant after 10 minutes until the end of operation. No statistically
significant in TV and SpO2 between groups. In ETT group MAP and HR after insertion are
significant higher than LTs group, no statistically significant about postoperative
complication such as sorethroat, hoarseness and nausea vomiting.
Conclusion LTs can be used in gynecological laparoscopic surgery like ETT.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03849846 -
Using Focus Groups to Explore Perceptions of Adults With Low Socioeconomic Status Regarding the NutriQuébec Study
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05775991 -
COACH-Cog Intervention Adaptation Focus Groups
|
||
Completed |
NCT00187655 -
Effect of, OAT3, on the Renal Secretion of Cefotaxime
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00187668 -
Study Of PHarmacogenetics in Ethnically Diverse Populations (SOPHIE Study)
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06410807 -
Development of Web-Based Mind-Body Trainings for Adults With Subjective Concerns
|