Crystalloid FLUID Choices for Resuscitation of Hospitalized Patients

Fluid Therapy Clinical Trial

— FLUID  

Official title:

Crystalloid FLUID Choices for Resuscitation of Hospital Patients: A Pragmatic Cluster Cross Over Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04512950
• Other study ID #: 0778
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• Start date: August 15, 2016
• Est. completion date: June 13, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: June 2023
• Source: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of the FLUID Trial is to conduct a pragmatic, multi-centre, open label randomized cluster cross-over trial (RCT) to determine whether fluid administration with 0.9% saline as compared to Ringer's lactate decreases death or re-admission to hospital with 90 days of the index admission.

Description:

Crystalloid fluids are used extensively for acutely ill patients who are admitted to hospital. Two fluids most commonly used are 0.9% saline and Ringer's Lactate. Both are used to rehydrate patients, restore fluid volume and help stabilize blood pressure and failing organ and both have been used for several decades. Until recently, it was thought the fluids are essentially equivalent other than some minor differences related to the concentration of salt components (sodium and chloride) and buffers (Ringer's Lactate has lactate as a buffer). The safety of 0.9% saline is now being questioned due to its high chloride content and its association with the development of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. Until recently, the evidence base supporting the superiority of Ringer's Lactate has been derived from observational studies. Two recent pilot studies in critically ill patients comparing 0.9% saline to balanced crystalloid fluids (Ringer's lactate and/or Plasma-Lyte, another balanced crystalloid) did not detect clinical outcome differences between the fluid groups, but the trials were not powered to do so. Furthermore, two multiple period cluster cross-over studies conducted at one institution comparing 0.9% saline to balanced crystalloids (Ringer's lactate and Plasma-Lyte) in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU) found small differences in a composite outcome which included death, requirement for dialysis or persistent renal dysfunction, in favor of balanced crystalloids. In contrast, two large multi-centre randomized trials (BaSICS, n=11 052 and PLUS, n=5037) examined the efficacy of NS as compared with a balanced crystalloid (RL and Plasma-Lyte 148, respectively) on the primary outcome 90-day mortality. Neither of these trials detected a difference in 90-day mortality; in BaSICS, the mortality rate was 22.0% versus 21.8%; in PLUS, mortality was 27.2% versus 26.4%. Renal function did not differ between the fluid groups in either trial, although the PLUS trial was stopped early due to recruitment challenges and insufficient funding during the pandemic. In a systematic review of 13 critical care trials to January 2022 and 35 884 participants, there were no detectable differences in renal function. In low risk of bias trials, there was no significant difference in mortality for the 0.9% saline as compared with balanced crystalloid group (28.2% and 27.9%, respectively; relative risk (RR) 0.96 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.01)), nor renal function. However, authors concluded that there is a high probability balanced crystalloids reduce death since the CIs ranged from a 9% relative reduction to a 1% relative increase in death. Authors and editorialists urge the conduct of large multi-centre randomized trials, with longer-term patient centred outcomes supported by health economic evaluations to provide confirmatory evidence to guide future clinical practice and resource allocation related to these usual care crystalloid fluids.

Small differences in clinical outcomes between crystalloid resuscitation fluids are highly relevant. Furthermore, small absolute differences in important clinical outcomes may translate into substantial savings to hospitals and the health care system. The FLUID trial will determine if there are differences in the clinically important outcomes of death and hospital re-admissions. FLUID is novel in its design because it is a hospital wide pragmatic cluster cross-over comparative effectiveness trial that will be conducted in both academic and community sites which will use provincial health administrative data available through the Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) for all clinical data collection. Our trial will answer this fundamental fluid resuscitation question and determine if Ringer's Lactate is superior to 0.9% saline at much lower cost in comparison to an individual patient randomized controlled trial (RCT), or even a conventional cluster RCT.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 140000
• Est. completion date: June 13, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: June 13, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 29 Days and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

? All adult and pediatric patients with an index admission to the participating hospitals during study periods

Exclusion Criteria:

• neonates

• physicians may opt out of the use of the allocated study fluid for a specific patient

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Fluid Therapy

Intervention

Drug:
• Ringer's lactate
Half of the hospitals will be randomized to Ringer's Lactate for a 12 week study period; after a 2 week run-out, the study fluid will be switched to 0.9% saline for another 12 week study period, followed by a 2 week run-out.
• 0.9% saline
Half of the hospitals will be randomized to 0.9% saline for a 12 week study period; after a 2 week run-out, the study fluid will be switched to Ringer's Lactate for another 12 week study period, followed by a 2 week run-out.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	Hamilton General Hospital	Hamilton	Ontario
Canada	University Hospital	London	Ontario
Canada	Victoria Hospital	London	Ontario
Canada	Montfort Hospital	Ottawa	Ontario
Canada	Queensway Carleton Hospital	Ottawa	Ontario
Canada	The Ottawa Hospital Civic Campus	Ottawa	Ontario
Canada	The Ottawa Hospital General Campus	Ottawa	Ontario

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Incremental cost, life-year saved, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY)	cost per life-year saved and cost per QALY gained	90 days from index hospitalization
Primary	Number of participants that died or were readmitted to hospital	the number of deaths or readmission to hospital	90 days from index hospital admission
Secondary	Number of participants that died	The number of deaths	90 days from index hospital admission
Secondary	Number of participants re-admitted to hospital	the number of participants re-admitted to any hospital in Ontario	90 days from index hospital admission
Secondary	Number of participants that required dialysis or continuous renal replacement therapy	the number of participants who required the initiation of dialysis or continuous renal; replacement therapy in the first 90 days from index hospital admission with no history of renal disease requiring dialysis in the previous 6 months	90 days from index hospital admission
Secondary	Number of participants that required re-intubation in the post anesthetic care unit operative period	the number of post operative participants who failed their initial extubation and required re-intubation in the post anesthetic care unit	during index hospital admission
Secondary	Duration of hospitalization	the number of days participants were hospitalized during index admission	Up to 90 Days from index hospital admission
Secondary	ED visits	number of index ED visits	number of index ED visits within 90 days of index hospital admission
Secondary	Discharged to a facility other than home	number of participants discharged from index hospitalization to a facility other than home	90 days from index hospital admission