Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

In this prospective randomized controlled trial, investigators aim to study the effects and safety of bicarbonated Ringer's solution in patients with septic shock compared with lactated ringer's solution, and provide evidence for current fluid resuscitation strategies for septic shock.


Clinical Trial Description

Although the latest guidelines recommend crystalloids as the first choice for the patients' fluid resuscitation, it still remains controversial that which crystalloid solution is the best choice. It is reported that balanced crystalloid can result in better outcomes than saline for critically ill patients. However, there are few studies conducted between different crystalloid solutions.

Lactated ringer's solution is the longest-used crystalloid solution. Compared with lactated ringer's solution whose anion is lactate, the anion of bicarbonate ringer's solution is bicarbonate. And lactate needs to be metabolized into bicarbonate through the mitochondria of the liver before it can play an alkalization role. Therefore, in theory, bicarbonate ringer's solution does not need to rely on liver metabolism, the onset time to maintain acid-base balance is shorter, and it may be more suitable for patients with severe acidosis. In patients with septic shock, the incidence of moderate to severe metabolic is increased. Bicarbonate ringer's solution can directly supplement the concentration of bicarbonate, while lactated ringer's solution needs to take time and be metabolized in the liver. Thus, we hypothesize that bicarbonate ringer's solution is more effective for patients with shock and metabolic acidosis than lactated ringer's solution. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04449757
Study type Interventional
Source Zhongnan Hospital
Contact
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date July 1, 2020
Completion date May 30, 2021

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03649633 - Vitamin C, Steroids, and Thiamine, and Cerebral Autoregulation and Functional Outcome in Septic Shock Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT04117568 - The Role of Emergency Neutrophils and Glycans in Postoperative and Septic Patients
Completed NCT04227652 - Control of Fever in Septic Patients N/A
Completed NCT05629780 - Temporal Changes of Lactate in CLASSIC Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT04796636 - High-dose Intravenous Vitamin C in Patients With Septic Shock Phase 1
Terminated NCT03335124 - The Effect of Vitamin C, Thiamine and Hydrocortisone on Clinical Course and Outcome in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04005001 - Machine Learning Sepsis Alert Notification Using Clinical Data Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05217836 - Iron Metabolism Disorders in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock.
Recruiting NCT05066256 - LV Diastolic Function vs IVC Diameter Variation as Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Shock N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05443854 - Impact of Aminoglycosides-based Antibiotics Combination and Protective Isolation on Outcomes in Critically-ill Neutropenic Patients With Sepsis: (Combination-Lock01) Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT04516395 - Optimizing Antibiotic Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Infection Caused by Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae N/A
Recruiting NCT02899143 - Short-course Antimicrobial Therapy in Sepsis Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02580240 - Administration of Hydrocortisone for the Treatment of Septic Shock N/A
Recruiting NCT02676427 - Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Shock Evaluated by Caval Ultrasound Doppler Examination
Recruiting NCT02565251 - Volemic Resuscitation in Sepsis and Septic Shock N/A
Terminated NCT02335723 - ASSET - a Double-Blind, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Investigation With Alteco® LPS Adsorber N/A
Completed NCT02638545 - Hemodynamic Effects of Dexmedetomidine in Septic Shock Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT02547467 - TOADS Study: TO Assess Death From Septic Shock. N/A
Completed NCT02204852 - Co-administration of Iloprost and Eptifibatide in Septic Shock Patients Phase 2
Completed NCT02079402 - Conservative vs. Liberal Approach to Fluid Therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care Phase 4