View clinical trials related to Fluid Resuscitation.
Filter by:The study aims to investigate the effect of 3% hypertonic saline resuscitation on lactate clearance in comparison to ringer's lactated solution and 0.9% normal saline in traumatic injury patients. Also to provide insights into the optimal fluid resuscitation strategy for traumatic injury patients
The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of electrical cardiometry (EC) for the noninvasive determination of fluid responsiveness in critically ill shocked patients and agreement of EC compared to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)
A prospective, individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) of four multicentre, open-label, randomised clinical trials of initial haemodynamic resuscitation in patients with septic shock.
In this prospective randomized controlled trial, investigators aim to study the effects and safety of bicarbonated Ringer's solution in patients with septic shock compared with lactated ringer's solution, and provide evidence for current fluid resuscitation strategies for septic shock.
Balanced solutions with low chloride concentration could represent an alternative to high chloride concentration solutions. Such balanced solutions contain other acid as buffers (i.e. acetate and/or gluconate). However, acetate has been associated with alteration of cardiac function when used as buffer in dialysate when high acetate concentrations are used and could promote the development of metabolic acidosis if it accumulates. Therefore, the safety of such solutions remains poorly explored. Because critically ill patients receive large amount of fluid during the early phase of resuscitation, large amount of acetate are to be administrated if such solutions are used. While acetate-containing solutions have been suggested to be safe in this setting, studies are still lacking regarding clearance and accumulation in critically ill patients. It is expected to include 28 patients, the objective to analyze the data of 20 patients.
Early and adequate fluid resuscitation (< 6 hours) in patients with circulatory failure is essential but may exacerbate oedema, which may itself: 1) aggravate pulmonary lesions and prolong mechanical ventilation, 2) aggravate organ failure and 3) increase mortality notably in patients with acute renal failure. Improving fluid balance is considered crucial in the management of patients in septic shock, but the efficacy of the measures currently proposed (diuretics associated or not with albumin and/or dialysis) is controversial. The investigators hypothesize that a whole-body compression using a body bandage could reduce capillary leakage and thus lead to faster restoration of a normal transmural pressure gradient in postcapillary venules and improve venous return. This is the first study to evaluate mechanical compression using a body bandage to reduce oedema in septic shock. To do this, a whole-body compression will be set up within the 12 hours following admission. Water balance will be monitored daily throughout the duration of the compression and vital status of patients will be search at 7 days, 28 days and 90 days.
In patients with moderate to severe thermal injuries (> 20% TBSA) adequate fluid resuscitation is the main priority to achieve successful outcomes. Soon after burn injury substantial amounts of fluid accumulate rapidly in the wound while more is lost in the third space. Without intervention this process leads to hypotension and shock. The Parkland formula was devised to calculate how much intravenous (IV) fluid, i.e. crystalloids, is needed for adequate resuscitation during the first 24 hours post-burn. However, IV resuscitation can lead to overexpansion of (third space) volume, leading to severe complications such as compartment syndrome or pulmonary edema. In major population centers, catastrophic events causing mass casualties will disrupt many hospital and emergency services, potentially delaying acute IV fluid resuscitation. Burn patient case reports have shown that oral rehydration therapy (ORT) used to supplement or in place of IV therapy is efficacious. ORT could be easily applied in mass burn casualties. ORT is generally known in the third world for treating life-threatening dehydration due to diarrhea. The glucose-sodium co transport mechanism enables the affected human intestine to absorb a sufficient amount of water and electrolytes to replace large fluid losses due to severe diarrhea, even under adverse field conditions. No electrolyte disturbances have been recorded in such cases. Studies on enteral resuscitation in animal burn models showed high rates of small intestinal absorption which should be adequate for resuscitation following major burn injury. The optimal composition of oral rehydration solution for resuscitation in burn wounds has not been determined. In cholera patients, Ceralyte® has proven superior to the World Health Organization Oral Rehydration Solution, increasing fluid absorption of the intestine. The Ceralyte® 90 solution, with 90mEq/L sodium and a low osmolarity of <275mOsm, may also contribute to optimal intestinal fluid uptake without causing electrolyte disturbances in thermal injury. ORT use might reduce the occurrence of compartment syndrome and pulmonary edema since fluid is regulated by the intestine according to physiologic requirements. The investigators propose to conduct a prospective study using Ceralyte® 90 to show that oral resuscitation therapy (ORT) in burns can reduce the total amount of IV fluid needed for adequate resuscitation and to test the efficacy and safety of ORT in the resuscitation of burn patients.
The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of syringe size on the amount of time it takes a health care provider to administer a known volume (900 mL) of resuscitation fluid to a non-clinical, toddler-sized, model. The investigators hypothesize that syringe size will impact fluid resuscitation time.