View clinical trials related to Fluid Overload.
Filter by:Although monitoring fluid balance for continuous renal replacement therapy-treated patients is an important issue, most physicians usually use conventional methods such as the difference between the amount of intake and output (I & O), which is not objective way. Meanwhile, bioimpedance electrical vector analysis presents the patients' fluid status with more objective data. Thus, the investigators will investigate the clinical benefit for monitoring fluid balance when the investigators use InBody S10, one of representative bioimpedance electrical vector analysis, compared with conventional methods among the patients who need continuous renal replacement therapy.
Fluid overload increases morbidity and mortality of pediatrics patients in intensive care unit (ICU). It could be interesting to predict the decrease in stroke volume when diuretics are prescribed. Nevertheless, no test predict a decrease of stroke volume in a context of a diuretics induced depletion. Abdominal compression (AC) coupled with echocardiographic measurement of the stroke volume can predict fluid responsiveness and is a good tool to assess preload dependency. Another point is that during depletion refilling can occur. We aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal compression to predict a decrease of the stroke volume of 15 % during diuretic-induced depletion of 10 ml/kg of diuresis. Secondary outcome will assess the hemoconcentration during depletion to diagnose a decrease of stroke volume during diuretic induced depletion
The aim of the study is to analyze if blood protein concentration variation during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with fluid removal can predict a decrease of 15 % of cardiac index in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Blood protein concentration, clinical data describing hemodynamic status (providing data from Pulsion medical system PiCCO2 ® monitoring), including preload dependency evaluation with passive leg raising, are collected at different times: before initiation of fluid removal, and after the first episode of hypotension or one hour after initiation of fluid removal.
Rationale: Fluid overload is a common complication in children who are admitted to the pediatric intensive care for mechanical ventilation. Acute lung infection is a frequent cause for admission to the PICU and forms an uniform group with a single organ failure. In these critically ill children, fluid overload is associated with adverse outcome. Restricting the volume of fluids already in an early stage of ICU admission may prevent fluid overload during mechanical ventilation and thus improve clinical outcome. However, at the same time fluid restriction may interfere with appropriate energy and macronutrient intake that is needed for recovery. Objective: The main goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of a restrictive fluid management protocol and investigate its effect on the occurrence of fluid overload in mechanically ventilated children with acute infectious lung disease. Study design: Single-center prospective randomized feasibility and pilot study in preparation of a multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT). Study population: Mechanically ventilated children with (suspicion of) acute infectious lung disease admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of the Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam. Intervention: Patients receive either liberal (control group) or a restrictive (experimental group) fluid treatment, while ensuring appropriate caloric intake. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcomes are cumulative fluid balance and body weight during the first week of mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes (in preparation of the larger multi-center RCT) include: mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation and oxygenation indices. To determine the feasibility, in- and exclusion rate, adherence to treatment arms, need for fluid bolus, need for diuretics and hemodynamic indices as well as energy and protein intake are studied. Both fluid management protocols reflect a variant of current clinical practice, hence will not provide extra burden or risk to patients included in the study. Patients will be randomized to either of the fluid protocol arms on admission to the PICU (at start of mechanical ventilation). Patients included in the restrictive fluid treatment arm might have direct benefit from the study if indeed fluid overload is less common in this group.