Effectiveness and Acceptability of Insertable Devices for Obstetric Fistula Management

Fistula Clinical Trial

— COPE  

Official title:

Effectiveness and Acceptability of Two Insertable Device Models for Non-surgical Management of Obstetric Fistula in Ghana: a Randomized Crossover Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05444504
• Other study ID #: P0555006
• Secondary ID: R01HD108236
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: April 15, 2023
• Est. completion date: December 1, 2026

Study information

• Verified date: December 2023
• Source: University of California, San Francisco
• Contact: Nessa E Ryan, PhD
• Phone: 17048062062
• Email: ryann01[@]nyu.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The investigators propose a clinical trial and nested qualitative study to 1) quantify the effectiveness of an insertable vaginal cup to manage fistula urinary incontinence, 2) examine user and implementer acceptability, and 3) quantify fistula management cost. Two intervention models will be compared among women awaiting fistula surgery or whose surgery was unsuccessful: 1) a vaginal cup ('cup'), and 2) the cup attached via rubber tubing to a leg-secured urine collection bag ('cup+') for greater urine holding capacity.

Description:

Obstetric fistula is a traumatic maternal morbidity resulting in severe urinary incontinence that increases stigma and reduces quality of life. The estimated two million women with fistula, most in sub-Saharan Africa, face substantial multi-level barriers to surgical repair. Women need an acceptable non-surgical option for therapeutic management of fistula-related urinary incontinence, yet no non-surgical standard of care exists. Use of an insertable silicone vaginal cup has great potential for fistula management; it is effective for menstrual management and efficacious at reducing short-term fistula urinary leakage. The investigators propose a clinical trial and nested qualitative study to 1) quantify the effectiveness of an insertable vaginal cup to manage fistula urinary incontinence, 2) examine user and implementer acceptability, and 3) quantify fistula management cost. Two intervention models will be compared among women awaiting fistula surgery or whose surgery was unsuccessful: 1) a vaginal cup ('cup'), and 2) the cup attached via rubber tubing to a leg-secured urine collection bag ('cup+') for greater urine holding capacity. Using a cross-over design for efficiency, 100 participants will be randomized to one of two sequences of leaking freely, cup, and cup+ at two fistula care centers in Ghana and observed for four days (total observations=400). Each treatment (cup, cup+ or leaking freely) is used for 24h for day and night use, then crossover. Data are captured through self-report and clinical checklist. On day 4, participants are re-randomized to use cup or cup+ at home for 3 months. Acceptability assessment is informed by implementation and health behavior theory. Aim 1. To quantify the effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of the cup and cup+. The trial will compare objective and patient-reported measures of effectiveness of the cup and cup+ to leaking freely and of the cup to the cup+. Short-term assessment will be objective (urinary leakage; 8, 24hrs), long-term assessment will be patient-reported (QoL; 1-3 months). Aim 2. To examine acceptability of cup and cup+. User and implementer acceptability will be assessed using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design. Acceptability among trial participants will be measured longitudinally (1-3 months). User and implementer acceptability will be examined within in-depth interviews of selected trial participants (n~30) at 3 months and potential implementers (ob/gyns, midwives/nurses, community health workers, n~20). Aim 3. To explore the material and opportunity costs to non-surgical fistula management. Surveys and time motion study among trial participants at facility and community will estimate direct and indirect costs of fistula management from a patient perspective. The long-term goal of the proposed work is to overcome barriers to comprehensive fistula care and increase quality of life through an acceptable, non-surgical option for therapeutic management of fistula.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 100
• Est. completion date: December 1, 2026
• Est. primary completion date: December 1, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 15 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria:

• VVF confirmed by dye test and clinical exam at least 3cm from the external urethral orifice (regardless of size), adequate vaginal capacity to accommodate the cup (per physician)
• Willing to insert and remove cup/cup+
• Clear understanding of the study procedures
• Willing to participate fully, not yet been repaired or previously failed surgical repair, at least 6mo post-surgery
• If previous fistula repair, =3mo post-delivery
• If recent birth, age 18+ or emancipated minor
• Speak English or local language

Exclusion criteria:

• Any rectovaginal fistula
• Women who are candidates for catheterization who could be healed without surgery will be excluded as they are <3mo post-delivery.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Fistula
• Fistula, Urinary
• Obstetric Fistula
• Urinary Fistula
• Vaginal Fistula

Intervention

Device:
• Cup
an insertable vaginal cup ('cup')
• Cup+
the cup attached via rubber tubing to a leg-secured urine collection bag ('cup+') for greater urine holding capacity

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Ghana	Mercy Women's Catholic Hospital	Mankesim
Ghana	Tamale Fistula Center	Tamale

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of California, San Francisco	Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana, Restore Health

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Ghana, 

References & Publications (51)

Adler AJ, Ronsmans C, Calvert C, Filippi V. Estimating the prevalence of obstetric fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Dec 30;13:246. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-246. — View Citation

Avery M, Prieto J, Okamoto I, Cullen S, Clancy B, Moore KN, Macaulay M, Fader M. Reuse of intermittent catheters: a qualitative study of IC users' perspectives. BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):e021554. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021554. — View Citation

Baker Z, Bellows B, Bach R, Warren C. Barriers to obstetric fistula treatment in low-income countries: a systematic review. Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Aug;22(8):938-959. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12893. Epub 2017 Jul 20. — View Citation

Banke-Thomas AO, Wilton-Waddell OE, Kouraogo SF, Mueller E. Current evidence supporting obstetric fistula prevention strategies in sub Saharan Africa: a systematic review of the literature. Afr J Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;18(3):118-27. — View Citation

Barageine JK, Beyeza-Kashesya J, Byamugisha JK, Tumwesigye NM, Almroth L, Faxelid E. "I am alone and isolated": a qualitative study of experiences of women living with genital fistula in Uganda. BMC Womens Health. 2015 Sep 10;15:73. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0232-z. — View Citation

Beksinska ME, Smit J, Greener R, Todd CS, Lee ML, Maphumulo V, Hoffmann V. Acceptability and performance of the menstrual cup in South Africa: a randomized crossover trial comparing the menstrual cup to tampons or sanitary pads. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Feb;24(2):151-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5021. — View Citation

Brook G, Tessema AB. Obstetric fistula: the use of urethral plugs for the management of persistent urinary incontinence following successful repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Mar;24(3):479-84. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1887-8. Epub 2012 Jul 18. — View Citation

Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6. — View Citation

Changole J, Thorsen VC, Kafulafula U. "I am a person but I am not a person": experiences of women living with obstetric fistula in the central region of Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 21;17(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1604-1. — View Citation

Chapple A, Prinjha S, Feneley R, Ziebland S. Drawing on Accounts of Long-Term Urinary Catheter Use: Design for the "Seemingly Mundane". Qual Health Res. 2016 Jan;26(2):154-63. doi: 10.1177/1049732315570135. Epub 2015 Feb 2. — View Citation

Creswell J, Plano Clark V. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed: Sage Publications, Inc; 2011.

Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812. — View Citation

Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 7;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50. — View Citation

De Ridder D. Vesicovaginal fistula: a major healthcare problem. Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jul;19(4):358-61. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32832ae1b7. — View Citation

Debas HT, Donkor P, Gawande A, Jamison DT, Kruk ME, Mock CN, editors. Essential Surgery: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 1). Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2015 Apr 2. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK333500/ — View Citation

El Ayadi A, Nalubwama H, Barageine J, Neilands TB, Obore S, Byamugisha J, Kakaire O, Mwanje H, Korn A, Lester F, Miller S. Development and preliminary validation of a post-fistula repair reintegration instrument among Ugandan women. Reprod Health. 2017 Sep 2;14(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0372-8. — View Citation

El Ayadi AM, Barageine J, Korn A, Kakaire O, Turan J, Obore S, Byamugisha J, Lester F, Nalubwama H, Mwanje H, Tripathi V, Miller S. Trajectories of women's physical and psychosocial health following obstetric fistula repair in Uganda: a longitudinal study. Trop Med Int Health. 2019 Jan;24(1):53-64. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13178. Epub 2018 Nov 18. — View Citation

Epiu I, Alia G, Mukisa J, Tavrow P, Lamorde M, Kuznik A. Estimating the cost and cost-effectiveness for obstetric fistula repair in hospitals in Uganda: a low income country. Health Policy Plan. 2018 Nov 1;33(9):999-1008. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy078. — View Citation

Fernandez-Romero JA, Deal C, Herold BC, Schiller J, Patton D, Zydowsky T, Romano J, Petro CD, Narasimhan M. Multipurpose prevention technologies: the future of HIV and STI protection. Trends Microbiol. 2015 Jul;23(7):429-436. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Mar 7. — View Citation

Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117. — View Citation

Ganyaglo GYK, Ryan N, Park J, Lassey AT. Feasibility and acceptability of the menstrual cup for non-surgical management of vesicovaginal fistula among women at a health facility in Ghana. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207925. eCollection 2018. — View Citation

GHS. Report on Fistula Burden in Ghana. 2015.

Goldberg L, Elsamra S, Hutchinson-Colas J, Segal S. Delayed Diagnosis of Vesicouterine Fistula After Treatment for Mixed Urinary Incontinence: Menstrual Cup Management and Diagnosis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep-Oct;22(5):e29-31. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000301. — View Citation

Hyttel M, Thomsen CF, Luff B, Tellier M, Storrusten H, Nyakato VN. Drivers and challenges to use of menstrual cups among schoolgirls in rural Uganda: A qualitative study. Waterlines. 2017;36(2):109-24.

Imoto A, Matsuyama A, Ambauen-Berger B, Honda S. Health-related quality of life among women in rural Bangladesh after surgical repair of obstetric fistula. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jul;130(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Apr 20. — View Citation

Juma J, Nyothach E, Laserson KF, Oduor C, Arita L, Ouma C, Oruko K, Omoto J, Mason L, Alexander KT, Fields B, Onyango C, Phillips-Howard PA. Examining the safety of menstrual cups among rural primary school girls in western Kenya: observational studies nested in a randomised controlled feasibility study. BMJ Open. 2017 May 4;7(4):e015429. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015429. — View Citation

Keya KT, Sripad P, Nwala E, Warren CE. "Poverty is the big thing": exploring financial, transportation, and opportunity costs associated with fistula management and repair in Nigeria and Uganda. Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 1;17(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0777-1. — View Citation

Madersbacher H. The Dilemma With the Terminology and the Studies of Intermittent Catheterization: What Is the Best Course of Action? Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports. 2017;12(4):349-53.

Mantey R, Kotoh AM, Barry M, Redington W. Womens' experiences of living with obstetric fistula in Ghana-time for the establishment of a fistula centre of excellence. Midwifery. 2020 Mar;82:102594. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102594. Epub 2019 Dec 13. — View Citation

Mwini-Nyaledzigbor PP, Agana AA, Pilkington FB. Lived experiences of Ghanaian women with obstetric fistula. Health Care Women Int. 2013;34(6):440-60. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2012.755981. — View Citation

NCAA. A Factsheet for Student Athletes: Assess Your Hydration Status. 2017.

New Vision Reporter. Menstrual cup: Temporary relief for fistula patients. New Vision. 2012.

North BB, Oldham MJ. Preclinical, clinical, and over-the-counter postmarketing experience with a new vaginal cup: menstrual collection. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Feb;20(2):303-11. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1929. Epub 2011 Jan 1. — View Citation

Norton JM, Dodson JL, Newman DK, Rogers RG, Fairman AD, Coons HL, Star RA, Bavendam TG. Nonbiologic factors that impact management in women with urinary incontinence: review of the literature and findings from a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases workshop. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Sep;28(9):1295-1307. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3400-x. Epub 2017 Jul 3. — View Citation

Okoye UO, Emma-Echiegu N, Tanyi PL. Living with vesico-vaginal fistula: experiences of women awaiting repairs in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Tanzan J Health Res. 2014 Oct;16(4):322-8. doi: 10.4314/thrb.v16i4.9. — View Citation

Pope R. Research in Obstetric Fistula: Addressing Gaps and Unmet Needs. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 May;131(5):863-870. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002578. — View Citation

Prieto J, Murphy CL, Moore KN, Fader M. Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 10;(9):CD006008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006008.pub3. — View Citation

Russell KW, Robinson RE, Mone MC, Scaife CL. Enterovaginal or Vesicovaginal Fistula Control Using a Silicone Cup. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):1365-1368. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001745. — View Citation

Ryan N. Stigma and coping among women living with obstetric fistula in Ghana: a mixed methods study. New York: New York University College of Global Public Health; 2019.

Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8. — View Citation

Shaw C, Logan K, Webber I, Broome L, Samuel S. Effect of clean intermittent self-catheterization on quality of life: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Mar;61(6):641-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04556.x. — View Citation

Tebeu PM, Fomulu JN, Khaddaj S, de Bernis L, Delvaux T, Rochat CH. Risk factors for obstetric fistula: a clinical review. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Apr;23(4):387-94. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1622-x. Epub 2011 Dec 6. — View Citation

Tellier S, Hyttel M. Menstrual Health Management in East and Southern Africa: a Review Paper. United Nations Population Fund and WoMena; 2018.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services NIoH, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of AIDS. Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Corrected Version 2.1. July 2017 [Available from: https://rsc.niaid.nih.gov/sites/default/files/daidsgradingcorrectedv21.pdf.

van Eijk AM, Zulaika G, Lenchner M, Mason L, Sivakami M, Nyothach E, Unger H, Laserson K, Phillips-Howard PA. Menstrual cup use, leakage, acceptability, safety, and availability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2019 Aug;4(8):e376-e393. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30111-2. Epub 2019 Jul 16. — View Citation

Wall LL. Obstetric vesicovaginal fistula as an international public-health problem. Lancet. 2006 Sep 30;368(9542):1201-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69476-2. — View Citation

Webster J, Nicholas C, Velacott C, Cridland N, Fawcett L. Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF among women following childbirth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Apr;50(2):132-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01131.x. — View Citation

Wellek S, Blettner M. On the proper use of the crossover design in clinical trials: part 18 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Apr;109(15):276-81. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0276. Epub 2012 Apr 13. — View Citation

Wilde MH, Fader M, Ostaszkiewicz J, Prieto J, Moore K. Urinary bag decontamination for long-term use: a systematic review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;40(3):299-308. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182800305. — View Citation

Wilde MH. Life with an indwelling urinary catheter: the dialectic of stigma and acceptance. Qual Health Res. 2003 Nov;13(9):1189-204. doi: 10.1177/1049732303257115. — View Citation

Wyndaele JJ, Brauner A, Geerlings SE, Bela K, Peter T, Bjerklund-Johanson TE. Clean intermittent catheterization and urinary tract infection: review and guide for future research. BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E910-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11549.x. Epub 2012 Oct 4. — View Citation

* Note: There are 51 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Mean change in volume of observed urine leakage	Urine leakage will be measured in mL using pad weight	baseline to 8 hours
Secondary	Mean change in volume of perceived urine leakage	Perceived urine leakage will be measured by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire SF (ICIQ-SF). This score ranges from 0-21 with higher scores indicating greater incontinence.	baseline vs. 8 hours, 24 hours,1 month, 2 months and 3 months
Secondary	Mean change in WHO Quality of Life BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) score	Quality of life will be measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. The score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.	baseline vs. 24 hours, 1 month, 2 months and 3 months
Secondary	Mean change in fistula-related stigma scale	Stigma will be measured using the fistula-related stigma scale, and enacted and internalized subscales. This score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating higher stigma.	baseline vs. 1 month, 2 months and 3 months
Secondary	Mean change in fistula management costs over time	Fistula management costs will be calculated by combining the total material costs and lost wages in Ghanaian Cedi (local currency) over time. Time in minutes will inform calculations of lost wages using prevailing wage rates for the study population. The mean change in cost will be from baseline to 3 months.	baseline vs. 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months
Secondary	Mean change in sleep satisfaction using the WHO sleep index	Sleep satisfaction using the adapted WHO sleep index. The score ranges from 1-5 where 1 is least satisfied and 5 is very satisfied.	baseline vs. 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months
Secondary	Mean change in Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (BRIEF) Coping scale	Coping will be measured using the modified BRIEF Coping scale. The score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better coping.	baseline vs. 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months
Secondary	Mean change in perceived empowerment over time	Empowerment change in the proportion of users across physical mobility, participation in income-generating activities, bodily autonomy, household decision making, reproductive autonomy, and social participation. Individual measures will be captured using a scale of 1-5, with 1 indicating lower empowerment and 5 higher.	baseline vs. 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months
Secondary	Changes in perceived safety over time	change in the proportion of users who report any adverse events with use of the intervention model at 1, 2, and 3-month follow up	baseline vs. 8 hours, 24 hours, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months
Secondary	Changes in user acceptability of the intervention over time	Proportion of users who report the intervention as acceptable measured across domains including easy to insert, remove, clean, comfortable to wear, interference with activities, perceived efficacy, self-efficacy, intent to use, and reported using a mean acceptability scale (based on composite score of acceptability items) regarding the intervention model. Standardized range will be 0-100, with higher values meaning greater acceptability and lower values lower acceptability.	8 hours vs. 24 hours, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months
Secondary	Changes in post-fistula repair reintegration scale	Reintegration will be measured using the post-fistula repair reintegration scale and subdomains comfort with relatives, relationship, general life satisfaction, family needs, and social engagement. The score ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating higher reintegration/functional status.	baseline vs. 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months